Other Universes: Do Our Laws Of Physics Apply?

The laws of physics are statements that hold true everywhere and every time. However, the question of whether these laws apply in other universes has sparked much debate. Multiverse theories allow for the possibility that the laws are different in different regions of space, although generally, the truly fundamental laws remain the same. For instance, recent studies have suggested that the fine structure constant, which determines the strength of interactions between light and matter, may be different in other parts of the cosmos. While some argue that this would simply be an environmental difference, others suggest that it challenges our understanding of the laws of physics. The interpretation of data from these studies is still under debate, and more research is needed to determine whether the laws of physics might need to be rewritten.

The laws of physics may change across the universe

The idea that the laws of physics may vary across the universe is supported by new evidence regarding one of the constants of nature, the fine structure constant, also known as alpha. This constant determines the strength of interactions between light and matter. Observations from telescopes in Hawaii and Chile suggest that the value of alpha may be slightly different in other regions of the universe compared to on Earth. This finding contradicts Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that the laws of physics are the same everywhere.

Furthermore, the analysis of around 300 measurements of alpha from various points in the sky indicates that the variation is not random but structured, creating a "preferred direction" or axis across the cosmos. This idea of a preferred direction was dismissed over 100 years ago with the creation of Einstein's special theory of relativity.

While the interpretation of the data is still controversial and subject to debate, it raises intriguing possibilities about the variability of the laws of physics across the universe.

In addition to observations, philosophical arguments also come into play when considering the universality of physical laws. Some argue that the laws of physics are contingent and may be local to our specific universe. Others propose the existence of a "`metaverse' or "multiverse," where different universes may have different physical laws.

However, it is important to note that the multiverse hypothesis is highly speculative and lacks supporting evidence. Additionally, philosophical discussions question whether it makes sense to think that there can be differing physical laws without a higher-level law regulating them.

In conclusion, while the current understanding suggests that the laws of physics are generally consistent across the observable universe, there are theories and observations that indicate the possibility of variation in different regions of space. Further research and evidence are needed to confirm or refute these ideas.

The laws of physics are statements that hold true everywhere

The laws of physics are akin to the rules of a game. While certain parameters can be tweaked without changing the game—for example, raising the hoop or making the court bigger in basketball—the core rules of the game remain the same. The laws of physics are similarly expected to be the same throughout space.

This expectation is supported by the fact that the laws of physics we know seem to hold true everywhere in the universe we can observe. For instance, the law of gravity that governs the flight of a baseball also governs the movement of planets, stars, and galaxies. Light from distant galaxies also reveals the same atomic and nuclear physics that we observe in our laboratories.

However, it is important to note that our understanding of the laws of physics is not complete, and there may be exceptions or variations that we have not yet discovered. For example, inside a black hole, our current theories of physics do not seem to apply due to the extreme conditions of high gravity and small scales.

Additionally, there are speculative ideas, such as the multiverse theory, which propose that there may be other universes with different physical laws. While these ideas are intriguing, they remain highly speculative and lack supporting evidence.

In conclusion, while the laws of physics are generally expected to hold true everywhere, there may be exceptions or variations that we have not yet uncovered, especially in extreme or unseen regions of the universe.

The laws of physics are mutable

The laws of physics are often thought of as being the same everywhere in the universe. As niels nielsen points out on Physics Stack Exchange, "Mother Nature might bat last, but you can't cheat her in any universe that is real." If the laws of physics were different in another location, that would mean that what we thought of as laws of physics were, in fact, environmental contingencies.

However, this view is not universally accepted. Sean Carroll, a theoretical physicist at Caltech, points out that the question of whether the laws of physics are mutable can be broken down into two separate questions: First, do the equations of quantum mechanics and gravity change over time and space? And second, do the numerical constants that populate those equations vary?

There is some evidence that the constants of nature might vary in different parts of the universe. In the 2010s, researchers led by John Webb of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia used observations from the Keck telescope in Hawaii and the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile to analyse the light from distant galaxies called quasars. They found that the value of the fine structure constant, which determines the strength of interactions between light and matter, was very slightly smaller 12 billion years ago than it is on Earth today. This result suggests that the fine structure constant varies in space rather than time.

Other researchers have also found evidence that the laws of physics might be different in other parts of the universe. In 1972, workers in the Oklo region of Gabon, Central Africa, discovered a group of "natural nuclear reactors" that spontaneously ignited and sustained nuclear reactions for hundreds of thousands of years. This provided researchers with a "radioactive fossil of what the rules of nature looked like" two billion years ago. While studies of Oklo have come to conflicting conclusions, the most recent studies suggest that changes to the fine structure constant are "consistent with zero".

Astrophysicists have also looked for changes in G, the gravitational constant, which dials in the strength of gravity. While lab experiments have returned confusing results, studies off Earth suggest that G isn't changing much, if at all.

In conclusion, while the laws of physics are often thought of as being the same everywhere in the universe, there is ongoing research that suggests that they might be different in other parts of the universe or might have changed over time. This research is challenging to conduct and interpret, and the results are not always consistent. However, it provides valuable insights into the nature of the universe and how it has changed over time.

The laws of physics are contingent

The laws of physics are also contingent on the specific region of space. For instance, the laws may differ on a smaller or larger scale than what we can observe. This is known as spontaneous symmetry breaking, where an initially symmetric state transitions into a less symmetric state, resulting in dramatically different outcomes.

Furthermore, the laws of physics are contingent on the specific time period. For example, the mass of an electron was zero until a tiny sliver of a second after the Big Bang when the Higgs field turned on. This suggests that the laws of physics can change over time, even if only for a very short period.

While the laws of physics are generally expected to be the same throughout space, there is room for variation and contingency, whether it be across different universes, regions of space, or time periods. These contingencies present intriguing possibilities and ongoing areas of research in the field of physics.

The laws of physics are universal

However, this does not mean that the laws of physics cannot change. In fact, there is some evidence to suggest that they might. For example, recent observations of distant galaxies called quasars indicate that the value of the fine structure constant, which determines the strength of interactions between light and matter, may be different in other parts of the universe. This would stand against Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that the laws of physics are the same everywhere.

The idea that the laws of physics might change across the universe is not new. Some cosmological theories, especially those that fall under the heading of "multiverse" theories, allow for the possibility that the laws are different in different regions of space. In these theories, the truly fundamental laws are the same everywhere, but the way the universe evolved in different regions is so different that the laws appear quite different.

For example, when the universe cooled down from very high temperatures, it probably underwent various transitions, more or less like phase transitions, in which the final state may be quite different. There could be different regions of the universe in which the symmetry breaking went different ways, and the "apparent" laws would be utterly different in these regions.

Nevertheless, the current understanding is that the laws of physics are universal. This is supported by various experiments and observations, such as those using atomic clocks to search for changes in the fine structure constant and those using light from distant quasars to study changes in the spectrum of light over time. While there have been some conflicting results, the latest studies show that changes to the fine structure constant are consistent with zero, suggesting that it has remained constant over time.

Frequently asked questions