Alabama Abortion Law: Exposing Rape And Incest Survivors

Alabama's abortion law, known as the Alabama Human Life Protection Act, is one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. The law, which came into effect in June 2022, bans all abortions unless a physician determines that the procedure is necessary to prevent a serious health risk to the pregnant woman. There are no exceptions for cases involving rape, incest, or human trafficking. The law defines a serious health risk as a condition that necessitates the termination of a pregnancy to preserve the life of the pregnant woman or to prevent substantial physical impairment of a major bodily function. This definition excludes mental health conditions, except in cases where a psychiatrist determines that the pregnant woman has a serious mental illness that could lead to her death or the death of the fetus. While the law does not penalize women who obtain illegal abortions, it imposes felony charges and years of imprisonment on physicians and other healthcare workers who perform them.

Alabama's abortion law, the Human Life Protection Act, does not provide exceptions for rape or incest

The absence of exceptions for rape and incest in Alabama's abortion law is particularly notable as, historically, Alabama allowed abortions in cases of incest or rape. With the introduction of the Human Life Protection Act, these cases were no longer exempt. This change made the bill one of the most aggressive anti-abortion laws in American history. Despite this, Alabama legislators were aware that its aggressiveness would likely not be approved in federal court due to Roe v. Wade at the time.

The lack of exceptions for rape and incest in Alabama's abortion law is not an isolated case. Of the 21 states with abortion bans or early gestational limits, 10 do not have an exception for pregnancies resulting from sexual assault. In the remaining 11 states with rape and incest exceptions, various factors, such as provider availability, law enforcement reporting requirements, and early pregnancy gestational limits, can make accessing abortion care extremely challenging for pregnant survivors of sexual assault.

The impact of the lack of exceptions for rape and incest in Alabama's abortion law is significant. It effectively denies access to abortion care for many survivors of sexual assault or incest, forcing them to carry unwanted pregnancies to term or seek alternative, potentially unsafe options. This can have profound physical, mental, and emotional consequences for those affected.

The controversy surrounding Alabama's abortion law and its lack of exceptions for rape and incest continues to fuel the ongoing debate around abortion rights and reproductive justice in the United States. While some support the restrictive abortion laws, others strongly advocate for the protection of abortion access, especially in cases of rape or incest.

The law only permits abortions in cases where there is a serious health risk to the mother

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as the Human Life Protection Act, is one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. It was passed in May 2019 and came into effect in June 2022 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The law bans most abortions at any stage of pregnancy and does not include exceptions for cases of rape or incest. The only exception is when there is a serious health risk to the mother.

The law defines a "serious health risk" as a condition that necessitates the termination of a pregnancy to preserve the life of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of substantial physical impairment of a major bodily function. This determination must be made by an Alabama-licensed physician and confirmed in writing by a second physician. The law does not include mental health conditions as valid reasons for abortion unless a woman has a serious mental illness that will lead her to engage in conduct that could result in her death or the death of her unborn child.

The law does not penalize women who have illegal abortions but does subject doctors who perform them to criminal charges, including felony charges and years in prison.

While the Alabama law allows for abortions in cases of serious health risk to the mother, in practice, these exceptions have proven unworkable and have prevented physicians from practicing evidence-based medicine. The vague language of the law leaves abortion providers with little guidance on how to interpret and apply it.

Furthermore, the lack of exceptions for rape and incest in Alabama's abortion law has been criticized as cruel and unfair, requiring survivors of sexual assault or incest to plead their case to a judge, lawyers, and hospital administrators. The requirement for law enforcement involvement in documenting rape and incest cases further restricts access to abortion care for survivors.

The law is designed to challenge the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as Senate Bill 35, is a law that seeks to add an exception for rape and incest to Alabama's abortion ban. This law is designed to challenge the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which established a framework for legal abortions across the United States.

Roe v. Wade was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, ruling that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States. The Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provided a fundamental "right to privacy," which protected a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. However, this right was not absolute and had to be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life.

The Alabama abortion ban, which took effect in June 2022, only allows limited exceptions in cases that pose "serious health risks" to the pregnant individual. Even this vague language leaves abortion providers with little guidance on how to interpret the law, as it does not define what constitutes a "serious health risk." This has created confusion and uncertainty for both patients and providers.

The Alabama law is part of a broader trend of state abortion bans and restrictions that have been implemented since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. These laws often include exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the pregnant person. However, in practice, these exceptions have often proven unworkable and have prevented physicians from practicing evidence-based medicine.

The challenge to Roe v. Wade by the Alabama law and other similar state laws has significant implications for the provision of abortion services and the rights of pregnant individuals across the United States.

Doctors who perform abortions in Alabama face criminal charges, but women do not

Alabama's abortion laws are some of the most restrictive in the United States. The state's abortion ban, which prohibits all abortions unless medically necessary to avoid a serious health risk to the pregnant woman, came into effect after the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. The law, known as the Human Life Protection Act, does not include exceptions for cases involving rape, incest, or human trafficking.

The penalties in Alabama's abortion law focus on those who perform an illegal abortion. The state will not file criminal charges against a pregnant woman who has an abortion. Instead, physicians and other healthcare workers found in violation of the law face felony charges and years in prison. Committing an illegal abortion is charged as a Class A felony, punishable by 10 to 99 years in prison. Attempting an illegal abortion is a Class C felony, punishable by one to 10 years in prison.

The lack of exceptions for rape and incest in Alabama's abortion law has been a subject of debate and scrutiny. While there is broad support for legal access to abortion in cases of rape or incest, Alabama's law, like many other states, does not include this exception. This means that survivors of sexual assault in Alabama may face additional barriers to accessing abortion care.

In Alabama, abortion providers are required to determine that an abortion is necessary to prevent a serious health risk to the pregnant woman. A serious health risk is defined as a condition that necessitates the termination of the pregnancy to preserve the life of the pregnant woman or avert a serious risk of substantial physical impairment of a major bodily function. This determination must be made by a licensed physician in a hospital where they have admitting privileges.

The Alabama abortion law has faced opposition and legal challenges. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Alabama and Planned Parenthood have filed lawsuits to challenge the law, arguing that it violates pre-existing abortion protections. However, the law remains in effect, and healthcare providers who perform abortions in Alabama continue to face criminal charges and penalties.

The vast majority of Americans support legal access to abortion for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest

The issue of abortion is a highly divisive one in the United States, with abortion laws varying widely from state to state. While a majority of Americans support access to abortion, the recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has resulted in a wave of new abortion restrictions and bans. Despite broad support for legal access to abortion in cases of rape or incest, 10 out of 21 states with abortion bans or gestational limits do not have an exception for pregnancies resulting from sexual assault.

Alabama is one of nine states with abortion bans that lack a rape or incest exception. The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, which took effect in June 2022, only allows limited exceptions in cases that pose "serious health risks" to the pregnant individual. However, this vague language provides little guidance to abortion providers and can be cruel and unfair to survivors of sexual assault or incest. Senate Bill 35, which seeks to add an exception for rape and incest to Alabama's abortion ban, is opposed by the ACLU of Alabama, which argues that abortion ban exceptions are not workable solutions and that people should not need permission to access the care they need.

The feasibility of accessing abortion care under rape and incest exceptions has received much less attention. In the 11 states with such exceptions, lack of provider availability, law enforcement reporting requirements, and early pregnancy gestational limits can make access to abortion care extremely difficult for pregnant survivors of sexual assault. Most rape or incest exceptions require the involvement of law enforcement, which can restrict abortion access for those who became pregnant as a result of sexual assault. The requirement to report the assault to law enforcement and provide a copy of the report to the physician can delay care and create additional barriers for survivors.

Furthermore, the tight timing and logistical challenges associated with these exceptions can make it nearly impossible for pregnant individuals to navigate the system and secure an abortion. The high cost of abortion services, often exceeding $500, can also be an insurmountable barrier, especially for low-income survivors of sexual assault. As a result, very few people have accessed abortion care under the rape or incest exceptions to state abortion bans.

The vast majority of Americans, about 8 in 10, support legal access to abortion for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. However, the current abortion laws and exceptions in many states fall short of providing meaningful access to abortion care for survivors of sexual assault. The restrictions and reporting requirements can deter providers and make it challenging for individuals to obtain the care they need.

Frequently asked questions