Georgia's Anti-Abortion Law: Punishing Women?

Georgia's abortion laws have been a topic of debate and controversy in recent years, with the state passing several restrictive measures that limit abortion access. The state's so-called fetal heartbeat law, also known as the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act or the LIFE Act, prohibits abortions after the detection of embryonic cardiac-cell activity, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This law has raised concerns about whether women who obtain abortions could be penalized, as it does not explicitly exempt them from liability. While some states' laws include language explicitly exempting women from prosecution, Georgia's law only provides a limited exception for medical emergencies. The lack of clear statutory protection has led to fears that women could be charged and convicted under the law, despite assertions from lawmakers that other factors, such as precedent in case law, would prevent this. The impact of Georgia's abortion ban has been significant, with women testifying that they have been forced to continue high-risk and non-viable pregnancies, posing risks to their health and human rights.

The law's impact on women with high-risk or non-viable pregnancies

Georgia's abortion ban has had a significant impact on women with high-risk or non-viable pregnancies. The ban, which prohibits abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, has forced women in Georgia to continue with pregnancies that pose serious health risks. This has resulted in women having to travel out of state to access the medical care they need.

In testimony before the U.S. Senate, Ms. Mackenzie Kulik shared her experience of developing complications during her second trimester. Despite being informed by her doctor that her pregnancy was non-viable and continuing it would put her health at risk, Kulik was unable to obtain an exemption under Georgia's abortion law. She was forced to travel out of state to receive the necessary medical care.

Another woman, Ms. Yasmein Ziyad, testified that she was denied an abortion even though she was experiencing a miscarriage. Ziyad's doctor feared losing his license or facing prosecution if he performed the procedure. As a result, Ziyad endured severe pain and suffering that could have been avoided if not for the restrictive abortion laws in Georgia.

Dr. Carrie Cwiak, an OBGYN in Atlanta, also provided testimony highlighting the negative impact of the abortion ban on women's health. She stated that patients were experiencing complications such as sepsis and hemorrhage due to the inability of doctors to perform medically necessary abortions. Cwiak emphasized that the ban had increased maternal mortality and poor health outcomes, with women being turned away or experiencing delays in their care.

The abortion ban in Georgia has had dire consequences for women with high-risk or non-viable pregnancies, putting their health and lives at risk. The lack of access to safe and legal abortions has forced women to seek alternative options, including travelling out of state or obtaining abortion pills illegally, which can have serious complications and consequences.

The law's effect on women's health and human rights

Georgia's abortion law has had a significant impact on women's health and human rights, with critics arguing that it prioritises the rights of the unborn over those of the pregnant woman. The law, which bans abortion after the detection of embryonic cardiac-cell activity, typically around the six-week mark, has been criticised for not explicitly exempting women who obtain abortions from liability. While lawmakers have argued that other factors would prevent the legal system from convicting women under the law, the lack of a broad exemption has caused concern and confusion.

The law's impact on women's health has been devastating, with investigations linking the ban to the preventable deaths of at least two women in Georgia. In one case, a woman was unable to obtain a timely abortion and experienced complications that led to her death. In another case, a woman with pre-existing health conditions that made pregnancy dangerous for her avoided seeking medical attention due to fear of prosecution under the abortion law. This lack of access to safe and legal abortion services has had fatal consequences, highlighting the law's detrimental effect on women's health.

Furthermore, the law's exceptions, which allow abortions after six weeks if the mother's life is at risk or in cases of rape or incest, are not always clear or easily interpreted. Physicians have expressed confusion over how to apply these exceptions in practice, which can lead to delays in care or even denial of treatment. The threat of prison time for doctors who perform abortions after six weeks further complicates the situation, potentially impacting the quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship.

The law also raises concerns about women's human rights, specifically their reproductive rights and autonomy. By restricting access to abortion services, the law limits women's ability to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare. This infringement on reproductive rights has sparked protests and marches supporting abortion rights, with activists arguing that the law infringes on women's liberty and privacy.

While Georgia's abortion law includes some exceptions to protect women's health and lives, the lack of explicit exemption from liability for women obtaining abortions and the confusing nature of the exceptions have had detrimental effects on women's health and human rights. The law's impact has been felt across the state, with investigations revealing preventable deaths and highlighting the urgent need for clear and accessible abortion services.

The law's lack of explicit protection for women

Georgia's abortion law, also known as the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act or the LIFE Act, does not explicitly protect women from liability if they obtain an abortion. This is in contrast to the laws of some other US states, including Texas, Tennessee, and Idaho, which include language that explicitly exempts women from prosecution.

The LIFE Act's lead sponsor in the Georgia General Assembly has stated that this omission was intentional, as lawmakers did not want to "send a mixed message" that "the value of the child is zero". However, he also noted that other factors, such as precedent in Georgia case law, would prevent women from being convicted under the law.

Indeed, Georgia case law has previously set a precedent of women not being convicted for abortions. In 1998, the Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled that a woman could not be prosecuted for violating the state's criminal abortion statute, even though she allegedly used a handgun to shoot herself in the abdomen for the purpose of killing her unborn child in the eighth month of pregnancy. The court cited previous Georgia court rulings that said pregnant women cannot be indicted for aborting their own babies.

Despite these assurances, some reproductive rights advocates fear that local district attorneys may still file charges against a woman who has an abortion to test the law. This lack of explicit protection has raised concerns that women could be penalized for seeking abortion services, even in cases of medical necessity.

In one example, a woman named Mackenzie Kulik testified that she developed significant complications during her second trimester of pregnancy and was told "off the record" by her doctor that her pregnancy was high-risk and non-viable. However, Kulik stated that her case "did not qualify for an exemption under Georgia's abortion law," and she had to travel out of state to receive the necessary medical care.

Another woman, Yasmein Ziyad, sought an abortion when she learned she was miscarrying. Despite her pregnancy being non-viable, she was denied an abortion because her doctor feared losing his license or being prosecuted under Georgia's abortion law. Ziyad experienced severe pain and bleeding as a result of being unable to obtain the necessary medical care.

These cases highlight the potential consequences of Georgia's abortion law lacking explicit protection for women who obtain abortions.

The law's exceptions for rape, incest, and medical emergencies

Georgia's abortion law, the LIFE Act, provides exceptions for abortion in cases of medical emergencies, medically futile pregnancies, and pregnancies that are the result of rape or incest.

Medical Emergencies

In the case of a medical emergency, abortion is permitted if a physician determines that there is a condition that necessitates an abortion to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a "substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function".

Medically Futile Pregnancies

Abortion is permitted when a physician determines that the fetus has a profound and irremediable congenital or chromosomal anomaly that is incompatible with life after birth.

Rape or Incest

The exception for rape or incest applies if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, a police report has been filed, and the probable gestational age of the fetus is 20 weeks or less. However, law enforcement involvement is often required to document rape and incest, which can prevent survivors from accessing abortion care.

The law's impact on abortion rights supporters and reproductive rights advocates

Abortion-rights supporters and reproductive rights advocates have been greatly impacted by Georgia's anti-abortion laws. The laws have made it increasingly difficult for people in Georgia to access abortion services, with abortion-rights advocates now suing to stop the ban in state court. The laws have also led to an increase in donations to abortion rights groups and sparked protests and marches in support of abortion rights.

One of the main impacts of Georgia's anti-abortion laws has been the restriction of access to abortion services. The state's six-week abortion ban, which was allowed to take effect by the Georgia Supreme Court, has made it nearly impossible for Georgians to access abortion care. This is because many people do not know they are pregnant until after the six-week mark. The ban also includes limited exceptions for cases of medical emergency or risk to the life of the pregnant individual. Doctors have delayed or denied care due to the vague nature of these exceptions.

In addition to restricting access, Georgia's anti-abortion laws have also had a significant impact on abortion-rights supporters and reproductive rights advocates. Abortion-rights advocates are now suing to stop the ban in state court. Following the passing of the state's controversial 2019 bill, abortion rights groups experienced a surge in donations. Women from Georgia also participated in marches supporting abortion rights as part of the #StopTheBans movement in May 2019.

The laws have also had a devastating impact on individuals seeking abortions. In 2022, two women in Georgia died as a result of complications from abortions. One of the women, Candi Miller, did not seek medical attention out of fear of prosecution under Georgia's abortion law. Her family stated that she had pre-existing health conditions that would have made it dangerous for her to continue her pregnancy. This case brought national attention to the impact of Georgia's abortion law and sparked further debate and protests surrounding abortion rights in the state.

Overall, Georgia's anti-abortion laws have had a significant impact on abortion-rights supporters and reproductive rights advocates, limiting access to services, sparking legal challenges, and leading to an increase in advocacy and support for abortion rights.

Frequently asked questions