Intimidation And The Law: Where Does It Apply?

Intimidation is a behaviour and legal wrong which involves deterring or coercing an individual by threat of violence. Intimidation is a crime in various jurisdictions and a civil wrong (tort). It is similar to menacing, coercion, terrorizing, and assault. Intimidation can be proven by words, actions, or other behaviours that can cause a reasonable person to experience fear or apprehension. The main difference between intimidation and criminal threats is that criminal threats require concrete threats of violence or a specific threat to commit a crime that would result in the person's death or great bodily harm. Intimidation, on the other hand, refers to any course of conduct directed at a specific person that creates fear or apprehension and serves no legitimate purpose. In some U.S. states, intimidation is a criminal offence, with varying definitions and punishments.

Intimidation as a criminal offence

Intimidation is a criminal offence in many parts of the world. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the penal codes of other nations based on the IPC, such as Singapore, Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, consider "criminal intimidation" a punishable offence. In the US, intimidation is a criminal misdemeanour in several states, including Guam, Montana and California.

Intimidation is an act or course of conduct directed at a specific person to cause them to fear or apprehend fear. It is usually carried out by deterring or coercing an individual through the threat of violence. The intimidation becomes a civil or criminal offence unless the behaviour serves a "legitimate purpose".

Intimidation of a victim or witness is not permitted. In a federal criminal case, the victim or witness can bring a civil action to restrain the person who intimidates them. The court may issue a temporary restraining order prohibiting intimidation or other forms of harassment if it finds that a reasonable person may believe the threat exists.

To prove intimidation, the prosecution must show that the defendant engaged in conduct or directed speech toward a specific person, that they intended their speech or conduct to create fear, and that their speech or conduct caused the person to be afraid. However, victims are not required to prove that they are in actual fear. Intimidation can be proven by words, actions, or other behaviours accumulated that can cause a reasonable person to apprehend fear.

Criminal threats and intimidation are usually not treated as standalone crimes. Instead, they are often elements of other crimes, such as assault, menacing, harassment, terrorism, criminal mischief, cyberbullying, hate crimes, and extortion.

Intimidation as a civil offence

Intimidation is a behaviour and legal wrong which involves deterring or coercing an individual by threat of violence. It is a civil or criminal offence in various jurisdictions. Intimidation is similar to menacing, coercion, terrorizing and assault in the traditional sense.

Intimidation is an act or course of conduct directed at a specific person to cause them to fear or apprehend fear. An individual may intimidate others by deterring or coercing them to take an action they do not want to take. Victims are not required to prove that they are in actual fear. Intimidation can be proven by words, actions, or other behaviours that can cause a reasonable person to apprehend fear.

Intimidation of a victim or witness is not permitted. The victim or witness in a federal criminal case can bring a civil action to restrain the person who intimidates them. The court may issue a temporary restraining order prohibiting intimidation or other harassment if it finds a reasonable person may believe the threat exists. The restriction is usually less than 14 days, but it can exceed this if the adverse party agrees.

Intimidation is also a misdemeanour in several US states, including Guam, Montana, and California. For example, §422.6(a) of the California Penal Code states:

> "No person, whether or not acting under colour of law, shall by force or threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55."

In Oregon, a violation of the state criminal statute for intimidation results in a civil violation. The plaintiff in the civil suit for intimidation may then secure remedies, including an injunction or special and general damages.

Criminal threats vs intimidation

Criminal threats and intimidation are two related crimes, both involving verbal (and sometimes non-verbal) acts intended to create fear or force someone to act against their will. However, they have some key differences.

Criminal Threats

Criminal threats require a very specific threat of violence or a threat to commit a crime against a person that would result in that person's death or great bodily injury. The elements the prosecution must show to prove criminal threats include:

• Issuing a warning to someone that you will physically harm or kill them.
• Making that threat with the intent that it be taken as true.
• The person threatened believed that the threat was imminent and unconditional.
• The person actually feared for their safety.
• A reasonable person would believe that the threatened person's fear was reasonable under the circumstances.

Intimidation

Intimidation refers to any course of conduct that creates fear in a person. To prove intimidation, the prosecution must show:

• That you engaged in conduct or directed speech toward a specific person.
• That you intended your speech or conduct to create fear.
• That your speech or conduct caused the person to be afraid.

Legal Consequences

Criminal threats and intimidation are usually not standalone crimes but are elements of other crimes that a prosecutor must prove. These include assault, menacing, harassment, terrorism, criminal mischief, cyberbullying, hate crimes, and extortion.

Defenses

Some common defenses for crimes involving threats or intimidation include:

• First Amendment protections: An attorney can argue that the statement was misinterpreted and not a genuine threat.
• Lack of intent: Showing that there was no intent to threaten or intimidate the alleged victim.
• False or untrue: Arguing that the alleged victim is making up the threat or intimidation for revenge, blackmail, or other reasons.
• Credibility: Challenging the believability of the threat or intimidation.

Intimidation as a Civil or Criminal Offense

Intimidation may become a civil or criminal offense unless the behaviour serves a "legitimate purpose." Intimidation of a victim or witness is not permitted, and the court may issue a temporary restraining order to prohibit intimidation or harassment. Intimidation is also a misdemeanor in several states, including Guam, Montana, and California.

Intimidation of a witness

Intimidation is a course of conduct or action directed at a specific person to cause them to fear or act against their will. It is important to note that victims are not required to prove that they experienced actual fear; intimidation can be proven by words, actions, or behaviours that could cause a reasonable person to feel fear. Intimidation becomes a civil or criminal offence unless the behaviour serves a "legitimate purpose".

The consequences of witness intimidation are severe. It deprives investigators and prosecutors of critical evidence, hinders the criminal justice system, and lowers public confidence in the system's ability to protect citizens. Witness intimidation can lead to suspects not being charged, cases being abandoned, or lost in court. Additionally, it requires law enforcement to spend significant time and energy persuading and protecting witnesses.

To address witness intimidation, the law provides certain protections. In the United States, the victim or witness in a federal criminal case can bring a civil action to restrain the person intimidating them. The court may issue a temporary restraining order prohibiting intimidation or harassment if it finds that a reasonable person may believe the threat exists. This order typically lasts less than 14 days but can be extended if agreed upon by the adverse party. Additionally, intimidation is considered a misdemeanour in several states, including Guam, Montana, and California.

Intimidation as a political process

Intimidation is a powerful tool in politics, and its use can have a significant impact on political processes and outcomes. It is a deliberate act or course of conduct directed at a specific person or group to cause fear or apprehension. While intimidation may serve a "legitimate purpose" in certain contexts, it often carries civil or criminal consequences.

In the political arena, intimidation is often employed to deter or coerce individuals or groups from taking actions contrary to the intimidator's interests. This can include threatening or coercing voters to interfere with their right to vote or attempting to influence their voting choices. Voter intimidation has been recognised as a federal crime in the United States, with laws such as the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 specifically addressing this issue. Voter intimidation can take many forms, including physical blocking of polling places, threatening language or behaviour, spreading misinformation, and aggressive questioning of voters.

Political intimidation can also extend beyond voter suppression. It may involve targeting political opponents, activists, journalists, or anyone perceived as a threat to a particular political agenda. Intimidation tactics can include harassment, stalking, violence, or the threat of violence. For example, a politician may use intimidation to deter a journalist from publishing an unfavourable story or to silence a whistleblower. In some cases, intimidation can be used to maintain power, suppress dissent, or create an atmosphere of fear to control the narrative and influence public opinion.

The use of intimidation as a political strategy is not limited to domestic politics. It can also be employed in international relations and geopolitical conflicts. For instance, a country may use intimidation to coerce another country into taking actions favourable to its interests or to deter potential adversaries from challenging its dominance. This can involve economic coercion, military threats, cyberattacks, or other forms of aggression.

While intimidation may sometimes be veiled or subtle, it can have severe consequences for its targets and the broader political landscape. It undermines democratic principles, infringes upon individual rights, and distorts the political process. To counter the negative impact of intimidation, legal systems often provide civil and criminal remedies. For example, victims of intimidation may seek restraining orders or file civil lawsuits, while perpetrators may face criminal charges, including misdemeanours or felonies, depending on the jurisdiction.

Frequently asked questions