Inverse Square Law: Understanding Magnetic Force Laws

The inverse square law states that the intensity of a physical quantity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from its source. While this law generally applies to forces, energy, or conserved quantities that are evenly radiated outward from a point source in three-dimensional space, it is unclear if it applies to magnets. The inverse square law is observed in phenomena such as gravity, electric, light, sound, and radiation. However, magnetism may be an exception due to its dipole nature.

Magnetic fields and inverse square law

The inverse-square law is a scientific principle that states the intensity of a physical quantity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from its source. In other words, as the distance from the source of a force, energy or conserved quantity increases, the intensity of that force decreases proportionally to the square of the distance.

In the context of magnetic fields, the inverse-square law can be applied to understand the behaviour of magnetic forces. However, it's important to note that magnetic fields are inherently more complex than other phenomena governed by the inverse-square law, such as gravity or electric forces. This is because magnets are dipoles, meaning they have both a north and south pole, and magnetic monopoles (single magnetic poles) have not been observed in nature.

The inverse-square law states that the strength of a magnetic field decreases with the square of the distance from its source. Mathematically, this can be expressed as the intensity of the magnetic field being inversely proportional to the square of the distance:

Intensity ∝ 1/distance^2

While this law generally holds true for magnetic fields, it's important to note that it applies specifically to idealised point sources. In reality, magnetic fields can be more complex, and the inverse-square law may not accurately predict the strength of a magnetic field in all cases. For example, the law may not hold for magnetic dipoles or non-uniform fields.

In the case of magnetic dipoles, the magnetic field exhibits a more complex behaviour. As the distance from the source increases, the magnetic field strength initially decreases as 1/distance^3 and then transitions to 1/distance^2 at greater distances. This behaviour is described by the Biot-Savart law and Gauss's law for magnetism.

It's worth noting that particle theorists predict the existence of magnetic monopoles, and if they were to exist, they would indeed follow the inverse-square law with a 1/distance^2 decay. However, as of yet, magnetic monopoles remain hypothetical.

Magnetic monopoles

The known elementary particles with electric charge are electric monopoles. In contrast, magnetism in bar magnets and electromagnets is not caused by magnetic monopoles. Instead, it is due to electric currents, as described by Ampère's law, and the intrinsic magnetic moment of elementary particles, particularly the electron magnetic dipole moment.

Paul Dirac's quantum theory of magnetic charge in 1931 showed that if magnetic monopoles exist in the universe, all electric charge in the universe must be quantized. While electric charge is indeed quantized, consistent with the existence of monopoles, there is no proof that the latter caused the former.

Despite the lack of evidence, some theories provide compelling arguments for the existence of magnetic monopoles. Joseph Polchinski, a string theorist, described their existence as "one of the safest bets that one can make about physics not yet seen". Further, searches for magnetic monopoles have been ongoing, with experiments in 1975 and 1982 producing candidate events that were initially interpreted as monopoles.

In 2009, researchers observed quasiparticles resembling magnetic monopoles in a crystal of the spin ice material dysprosium titanate. Using neutron scattering, they showed that magnetic moments aligned into interwoven tubelike bundles resembling Dirac strings, with monopole-like magnetic fields at the defect formed by the end of each tube.

In summary, magnetic monopoles are hypothetical particles with a single magnetic pole and a net magnetic charge. While there is currently no evidence for their existence, various theories predict their existence, and ongoing searches continue to explore this intriguing possibility.

Magnetic force and distance

The inverse square law states that the intensity of a physical quantity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. In other words, as the distance from the source doubles, the intensity is reduced to a quarter.

In the context of magnetic force and distance, the inverse square law does not directly apply. This is because magnets are dipoles, meaning they have both a north and south pole, and no magnetic monopoles (a single magnetic pole) have ever been observed. Magnetic dipoles have an inverse cube dependence, meaning the strength of the magnetic force decreases as the cube of the distance. So, if the distance from a magnet is doubled, the strength of its force is reduced to an eighth.

However, if magnetic monopoles did exist, they would exhibit an inverse square relationship with distance. This is because the inverse square law generally applies to any force that is evenly radiated outward from a point source in three-dimensional space.

It is important to note that the inverse square law is an idealized model and may not accurately describe the behaviour of complex magnetic fields or those produced by non-uniform sources.

Magnetic field strength

The strength of a magnetic field corresponds to the density of the field lines. In a straight conductor, the field lines are at their densest nearest the conductor, so that is where the magnetic field is at its strongest. In a coiled conductor, the lines are at their densest at the centre of the coil, where the field strength is at its greatest.

The total number of magnetic field lines penetrating through a defined surface in a specific amount of time is called the magnetic flux. It is directly proportional to the number of magnetic field lines that pass through the surface. The more concentrated the lines, the greater the flux density.

Magnetic field sources

Magnetic fields are created by moving electric charges and the intrinsic magnetic moments of elementary particles associated with a fundamental quantum property, their spin.

Magnetic fields and electric fields are interrelated and are both components of the electromagnetic force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature. The term magnetic field is used for two distinct but closely related vector fields denoted by the symbols B and H.

Magnetic fields are produced by various sources, including:

• Permanent magnets: Objects that produce their own persistent magnetic fields, typically made of ferromagnetic materials such as iron and nickel.
• Electric currents: Moving electric charges create magnetic fields, and the interaction of magnetic fields in electric devices such as transformers can be conceptualised as magnetic circuits.
• The Earth: The Earth's magnetic field is produced by convection of a liquid iron alloy in its outer core. This shields the Earth's ozone layer from the solar wind and is important for navigation using a compass.
• Electromagnetic devices: The connection between electricity and magnetism is exploited in devices such as computer hard drives, telephones, televisions, computers, and the internet.
• Astronomical objects: The magnetic fields of distant astronomical objects can be measured through their effects on local charged particles, such as electrons spiralling around a field line to produce synchrotron radiation detectable in radio waves.
• Induction: A changing magnetic field generates an encircling electric field, a phenomenon known as Faraday's law of induction.

Frequently asked questions