Ohio Abortion Law: Exploring Exception Legality

Ohio's abortion law has been a topic of much debate and legal back-and-forth in recent years, with the state's legislation on the matter undergoing several changes. The state's abortion ban, which includes no exceptions for rape or incest, was held up in court and signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine in 2019. However, this law was temporarily blocked by a federal judge in July 2019, and later by a Hamilton County Common Pleas Court judge in September 2022. As a result of the November 2023 Ohio Issue 1 referendum, abortion is currently legal in Ohio up to the point of fetal viability. The amendment protects a person's right to make and carry out one's own reproductive decisions, including abortion, but allows the state to prohibit abortions after a fetus is deemed viable, with exceptions for cases where the mother's life or health is at risk.

No exceptions for rape or incest

Ohio's abortion law has been the subject of much debate and legal back-and-forth in recent years. The state's abortion ban, which includes no exceptions for rape or incest, was signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine in 2019. This law, known as the "Human Rights and Heartbeat Protection Act", bans abortion after any embryonic cardiac activity is detected, typically occurring between five and six weeks into a pregnancy.

The law came into effect in June 2022 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The impact of this decision was immediate and devastating for some, with a ten-year-old rape victim being forced to flee to Indiana for an abortion, as there was no exception to the ban for rape or incest. The story of this young girl brought national attention to the extreme nature of the law, and the lack of exceptions for such tragic circumstances.

The law has had other tragic consequences, with doctors providing sworn affidavits detailing the harm caused by the ban. For example, two women with cancer were unable to terminate their pregnancies and, as a result, could not receive cancer treatment. In other cases, women with partially delivered fetuses that were too undeveloped to survive had to wait 24 hours or for the fetus's heart to stop before receiving treatment. The law has also been criticised for re-traumatising women who are already devastated by the loss of an unviable pregnancy, forcing them to go through additional distressing steps to receive the care they need.

The lack of exceptions for rape and incest in Ohio's abortion law has had a profound impact on the lives of its residents, particularly those who have experienced sexual assault and minors. The law has been challenged in court, and its enforcement has been temporarily blocked, but the fight over abortion rights in Ohio continues, with voters playing a crucial role in deciding the future of reproductive rights in the state.

Abortion rights activists' reactions

Abortion rights activists have welcomed the Ohio Supreme Court's decision to block a "heartbeat bill" that banned abortions after six weeks of gestation. The decision, which came after a challenge in court by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, allows abortions up to 22 weeks of gestation. This is a significant victory for abortion rights activists, who have been advocating for the nullification of pre-amendment restrictions, such as a 24-hour waiting period and laws prohibiting advanced practice nurses from prescribing abortion medications.

The passage of November 2023 Ohio Issue 1, which amended the state constitution to include a right to abortion and other reproductive healthcare, is also a major win for abortion rights activists. The amendment was passed with 57% of the vote, demonstrating strong public support for abortion rights in the state. The initiative was supported by a coalition of abortion-rights organizations, collectively called Ohioans United for Reproductive Justice. This victory is particularly notable as Ohio is the first red state to vote on adding a right to abortion to its constitution.

However, abortion rights activists recognize that there is still work to be done in Ohio. Existing abortion-related lawsuits are creating uncertainty about how and when the amendment will be implemented. Additionally, anti-abortion activists are pressuring Republican elected officials to extend their efforts to halt or water down the amendment. Abortion rights activists are calling on lawmakers to bring Ohio law in line with the new constitutional amendment and repeal existing restrictions on abortion access. They argue that citizens should not have to go to court for every restriction and that the current laws cause harm to those seeking abortions.

Abortion rights activists in Ohio have also been active in protesting against abortion bans and restrictions. Following the overturn of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, hundreds of abortion rights protesters gathered at the Ohio State Capitol in Columbus, with additional protests in Akron, Bowling Green, Cincinnati, and Cleveland. In May 2019, women participated in a heartbeat bill ban protest in Cleveland as part of the #StoptheBans movement, and a similar protest in Cincinnati saw dozens of people chanting, "Right to life, that's a lie, you don't care if women die." These protests and demonstrations reflect the ongoing activism and commitment of abortion rights activists in Ohio to protect and expand access to abortion.

The impact of the abortion ban on doctors

Loss of License and Criminal Charges: Doctors who perform abortions in violation of the law face severe consequences, including losing their medical licenses and being charged with felonies. This has created a climate of fear and uncertainty among physicians, who are concerned about potential legal repercussions.

Vague Exceptions: The exceptions outlined in Senate Bill 23 (SB 23) to protect mothers' lives and health are considered vague and open to interpretation. Doctors are unsure about the specific conditions under which they can legally perform an abortion, leading to confusion and hesitation in providing care.

Delayed Treatment: The abortion ban has resulted in delayed treatment for women experiencing inevitable miscarriages. Doctors are afraid to intervene until the patient starts bleeding heavily, which has led to preventable transfusions and prolonged suffering.

Ectopic Pregnancies: Ectopic pregnancies, which occur when a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, pose a serious risk to the mother's life. Doctors detecting such pregnancies must refer mothers to emergency rooms, where physicians are reluctant to act until they can prove the presence of an ectopic pregnancy, delaying treatment and increasing risks.

Mental Health Concerns: The ban has had a significant impact on the mental health of patients. Doctors have reported instances of women threatening suicide or self-harm due to their inability to obtain an abortion. This has placed physicians in a difficult position, having to balance the legal restrictions with the urgent need to address their patients' mental health crises.

Fear and Vigilance: The abortion ban has created an atmosphere of fear and vigilance among doctors. They feel the need to be cautious in their interactions with patients and other medical professionals, concerned that their conversations or actions could be reported to the authorities.

Impact on Maternal Health: The ban has negatively affected maternal health, particularly in emergency situations. Doctors are faced with challenging decisions regarding the interpretation of vague exceptions in the law, potentially delaying treatment and increasing health risks for pregnant women.

Unclear Guidelines: The abortion ban, with its limited and ambiguous exceptions, has left doctors struggling to navigate ethical and legal boundaries. This ambiguity has made it difficult for physicians to provide clear guidelines to their patients, further complicating an already sensitive and complex issue.

The impact of the abortion ban on women with cancer

In Ohio, abortion is legal up to the point of fetal viability, with the only exception being a medical emergency that poses a "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman."

The abortion ban in Ohio has had a detrimental impact on women with cancer, as their access to timely and effective treatment has been delayed or denied. The ban has created a situation where physicians must balance the safety of both the mother and the fetus, often resulting in compromised care for the mother. This is especially critical for cancers that are influenced by the hormones of pregnancy, such as breast cancer.

The vague and restrictive nature of the abortion laws in Ohio has led to confusion and uncertainty among medical professionals, who are unsure of when and under what circumstances they can legally provide abortions. This has resulted in delays or denials of cancer treatment for pregnant women, putting their lives at risk.

The criminalization of abortion in Ohio has also created a climate of fear and hesitation among healthcare providers, who are concerned about potential prosecution or civil liability for providing abortions. This has resulted in a chilling effect, with some doctors choosing to stop performing abortions altogether, further limiting access to critical healthcare services for women with cancer.

The abortion ban in Ohio has had a devastating impact on women with cancer, compromising their health, safety, and well-being. The ban has created a situation where women with cancer are unable to access timely and effective treatment, putting their lives and futures at risk.

The impact of the abortion ban on minors

The abortion ban in Ohio has had a significant impact on minors, particularly those who have experienced sexual assault or are facing health issues such as cancer. Here are some key points outlining the effects of the abortion ban on minors:

• Minors Seeking Abortion Due to Sexual Assault: The 2022 Ohio child-rape and Indiana abortion case highlighted the impact of the abortion ban on minors. A ten-year-old girl from Columbus, Ohio, who became pregnant due to sexual assault, had to travel to Indiana to obtain an abortion as the 6-week abortion ban in Ohio did not provide an exception for rape cases, including minors. This case drew national attention and criticism.
• Instances of Minors Leaving the State for Abortions: Abortion providers in Cincinnati filed affidavits detailing instances of minors who were victims of sexual assault and had to seek abortions out of state due to the restrictive abortion laws in Ohio.
• Mental Health Concerns: The inability to access abortion services has led to reports of minors threatening suicide or self-harm. The restriction on abortions can exacerbate mental health issues for minors facing unplanned pregnancies, particularly in cases of sexual assault.
• Impact on Minors with Health Issues: The abortion ban has also affected minors with health issues, such as cancer. There have been cases where minors with cancer were refused abortions and, as a result, could not receive necessary cancer treatment while pregnant.
• Judicial Bypass Process: Ohio law requires minors under 18 to obtain consent from a parent or go through a judicial bypass process to obtain an abortion. The abortion ban, coupled with these consent requirements, creates additional hurdles for minors seeking abortions, potentially delaying access to time-sensitive medical care.
• Lack of Exceptions for Minors: The abortion ban in Ohio, as outlined in the Human Rights and Heartbeat Protection Act, does not include exceptions for minors who become pregnant due to rape or incest. This lack of exceptions places further restrictions on minors' access to abortion services.

Frequently asked questions