Social Media And Law: A Breach?

Social media is a relatively new phenomenon, and the laws surrounding it are still evolving. Social media law covers a broad range of legal issues, including user-generated content, privacy, intellectual property, and advertising. With the ever-increasing presence of social media in our lives, it is important to be aware of the potential legal implications of our online activity. This is especially true for small businesses, which can benefit from the advertising opportunities that social media provides, but also risk legal consequences if they or their employees misuse it. For example, Florida recently passed a law restricting minors from owning social media accounts, which has sparked lawsuits over First Amendment rights and the potential harm caused by age verification requirements.

Privacy laws

Privacy Risks on Social Media

Social media users often share intimate details of their lives, including personal and sensitive information. This data can include status updates, profile details, location data, personal interests, shared content, employment information, and personal identifiers. While users may voluntarily provide some of this information, they may also unknowingly reveal data through tracking cookies, which monitor online activity.

The information shared on social media can be accessed not only by friends and followers but also by advertisers, scammers, and, in some cases, hackers. Even with privacy settings in place, data breaches and unauthorised access can occur, leading to privacy violations.

The privacy concerns surrounding social media have led to the development of laws and regulations to protect user data. Here are some key aspects of privacy laws related to social media:

• Federal Laws: In the United States, there are a few federal laws that touch on social media privacy. The Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) are the most commonly applied laws in this context. COPPA, for example, restricts the collection of personal information from children under 13 years of age.
• State Laws: Several states in the US, such as California, Virginia, Colorado, and Texas, have taken proactive measures to protect social media privacy. These laws include requirements for companies to implement data security measures, establish liability and punishment for hacking, and notify users about data breaches.
• International Laws: The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a notable example of international privacy legislation. It applies to companies handling personal data of EU residents and includes a "right to be forgotten" provision, allowing individuals to request the deletion of their data.
• Regulatory Agencies: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the US has also played a role in addressing social media privacy issues. They have the authority to investigate unfair trade policies and have expressed interest in expanding protections due to AI cybersecurity concerns.
• Company Policies: Social media companies have their own privacy policies and user agreements, which outline how they collect, use, and store user data. However, these policies have sometimes been criticised for being vague and difficult to interpret.
• Workplace Privacy: Employees also have privacy rights related to social media usage in the workplace. Laws such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) protect workers from employers' attempts to access their personal social media accounts or require the disclosure of login credentials.

While these laws and regulations provide a framework for privacy protection on social media, the constantly evolving nature of the online world presents ongoing challenges. As social media platforms continue to innovate and expand their reach, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant about their privacy settings and for lawmakers to adapt legislation to address new privacy risks.

Copyright infringement

When posting on social media, users are usually agreeing to the platform's terms and conditions, which often include granting the platform a license to use, distribute, copy, and sell the content posted. However, it is important to note that social media platforms do not gain ownership of the content and users must still obtain permission from the copyright owner before sharing or posting someone else's work. Fair use exceptions do exist, which allow limited use of copyrighted works without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, and research.

To avoid copyright infringement on social media, users and businesses should implement proactive strategies. This includes monitoring social media channels for unauthorized use of copyrighted material, obtaining permission from the copyright owner before sharing their work, and educating employees and influencers about copyright laws and proper licensing procedures. Additionally, when using someone's photo on social media, it is important to ensure that you have signed releases from anyone in the picture to avoid violating their rights of privacy or publicity.

Businesses, in particular, should establish a social media policy with the help of legal counsel to ensure compliance with copyright laws. This includes creating guidelines for resharing content, using trending audio tracks, and collaborating with content creators. Businesses should also aim to post original content created by their company whenever possible and use the correct type of account to avoid copyright infringement issues.

Defamation

To meet the legal definition of defamation, the statement must be:

• Published or shared with a third party
• Presented as fact, not opinion
• Harmful to the subject's reputation

The defamatory statement does not need to be shared with a wide audience to meet the publication requirement. A single Facebook post or tweet seen by just a handful of people can still be considered defamation if the other criteria are met.

However, the standard for proving defamation is higher for public figures like politicians and celebrities. They must show "actual malice", meaning the poster knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Private figures must simply prove negligence, not actual malice.

In the United States, defamation is considered a "tort" or civil wrong under state law. Victims of online defamation can sue the poster for damages in civil court. While there is no federal defamation law, defamation is recognized as an exception to First Amendment protections of free speech.

If you are the victim of defamation on social media, here are some steps you can take:

• Document the defamatory posts and comments with screenshots
• Report the content to the social media platform for removal
• Send a cease and desist letter demanding a retraction
• File a defamation lawsuit to unmask anonymous posters and seek damages

It is important to act quickly, as the longer the defamatory content stays up, the more damage it can do. Consulting with an experienced internet defamation attorney is critical for navigating this complex legal landscape.

Advertising law

Social media is a powerful tool for businesses to promote their products and services, increase brand awareness, and foster brand engagement. However, it is important to understand the legal implications of social media advertising to avoid potential lawsuits and regulatory issues.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plays a crucial role in regulating social media advertising. The FTC enforces rules and regulations to prevent misleading endorsements and ensure transparency in sponsored content. According to FTC guidelines, the connection between the endorser and the company must be clearly disclosed, and consumers must know if someone is being compensated for their endorsement. Additionally, endorsements must reflect the honest opinion of the endorser and cannot be used to make claims that the marketer couldn't legally make.

To ensure compliance, companies should develop a Social Media Marketing Compliance Program and provide social media compliance training to their employees. This will help them understand how advertising laws and regulations apply to social media and how to make proper disclosures. Failure to comply with FTC regulations can result in civil lawsuits, regulatory investigations, significant fines, and damage to customer goodwill.

In the UK, the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has created a guide for social media influencers, in collaboration with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). This guide clarifies the rules around social media advertising and sponsored content. It is now illegal for brands or individuals to post sponsored content without disclosing it. The guide recommends using clear labels such as "ad" or "advert" to indicate when a post is an advertisement.

Businesses should also be mindful of other digital media laws that may impact their social media activities, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Communications Decency Act, the Copyright Act, and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Developing a comprehensive social media policy can help protect businesses from legal disputes and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

Age-restricted content

The minimum age for most social media platforms is 13, though some networks set the limit at 16 or 18 and over. This minimum age requirement is influenced by national data protection laws. In the US, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) requires online services and sites to seek parental consent when collecting personal data from children under 13. To avoid this complication, social networks set their minimum age requirement to 13.

However, it is relatively easy for children under 13 to bypass these age restrictions, often with the consent or assistance of their parents. A 2021 survey by Common Sense Media found that 38% of 8 to 12-year-olds have used social media. This has raised concerns about the efficacy of current age limits and the potential harm that young individuals may be exposed to online.

In response, several policymakers and child development experts have proposed raising the minimum age requirement for social media use. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy has advocated for stricter age limits to protect younger audiences from the "skewed and distorted environment" that these platforms can create. Internationally, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) allows member states to set their own age limits between 13 and 16 years.

To address the issue of underage users, social media platforms have implemented various age verification methods. Some platforms require users to upload a government-issued ID, take a selfie, or enter their birthday. However, age verification on digital platforms is largely based on self-reporting, which is easy to falsify. More stringent verification processes raise concerns about privacy and accessibility.

Despite the challenges of enforcement, there is a growing consensus that stricter age restrictions on social media platforms are necessary to protect children's safety and mental health. Early and unrestricted social media use has been linked to various adverse effects, including mental health issues, distortion of self-image, and cyberbullying.

To enhance age verification processes, some have proposed requiring government-issued identification. However, this approach raises ethical and technical concerns about privacy and the broader accessibility of online services. As a result, social media platforms primarily rely on self-reported data for age verification, which can be easily bypassed by underage users.

In conclusion, while social media platforms have implemented age restrictions and verification methods, the current measures are not entirely effective in preventing underage users from accessing their services. As the online environment continues to evolve, it is essential to explore more robust solutions that balance user privacy, accessibility, and the protection of minors.

Frequently asked questions