The Big Bang: Beyond The Laws Of Physics?

The Big Bang theory is a fancy way of saying 'a rapid expansion of spacetime from a very dense, hot state'. The theory does not include the bang itself, but instead explains what happened after this initial expansion. The Big Bang theory does not break the laws of physics; instead, it is supported by the laws of thermodynamics and particle physics. However, the laws of physics do not currently provide answers to questions about the Big Bang, as modern physics is not yet advanced enough.

The Big Bang theory doesn't break the laws of physics, it just shows that our current understanding of physics is incomplete

The Big Bang theory doesn't break the laws of physics; it just shows that our current understanding of physics is incomplete.

The Big Bang theory is a "fancy way of saying 'a rapid expansion of spacetime from a very dense, hot state'". It does not contradict the law of conservation of mass, as mass is interchangeable with energy (as shown in Einstein's famous equation, E=mc2). It also does not contradict Newton's First Law, as Newton's laws of motion are approximations that work in "normal" surroundings, but cease to be useful in circumstances where there is a lot of energy, mass, or fast-moving objects.

The Big Bang theory does not include the "bang" itself, as it starts at the point where our current laws of physics begin to be valid. The theory assumes a starting point where the universe was very different from how it is today, due to extremely high temperatures, densities, and pressures. In such an environment, the law of conservation of energy did not apply on a universal scale, and neither did the law of conservation of mass.

The Big Bang theory is supported by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, which predicts that the universe is constantly increasing in the rate that it expands. This was confirmed by Edwin Hubble, who observed that the light from certain galaxies was redshifting, meaning that they were moving further away from Earth. The further away an object was, the faster it was moving away. This led to the conclusion that the universe is expanding, and that it must have originated from a singular point.

The laws of thermodynamics and particle physics also support the Big Bang theory. When the consequences of these laws are taken into account in a simplified Big Bang model, the predicted ratios of helium to hydrogen and to lithium in the visible universe match those that have been observed.

In conclusion, the Big Bang theory does not break the laws of physics. Instead, it highlights the limitations of our current understanding and points towards the need for new theories that can account for the extreme conditions present during the early universe.

The laws of physics break down in extreme environments like the centre of a black hole or during the Big Bang

A common source of problems in modern physics is singularities, such as black holes and the Big Bang. Singularities are problematic because various quantities relating to them become infinite, and infinity is not a physical quantity. This indicates that our current laws of physics are incomplete. For example, while general relativity works perfectly well for most of the universe, it cannot provide sensible answers in extreme environments like the centre of a black hole.

The laws of physics break down when the interactions between particles are too strong to use approximations in equations. This is the case during the Big Bang, when interaction energies and strengths are extremely high. Therefore, a new theory of physics is needed to deal with such high-energy regimes.

The Big Bang theory does not contradict itself by breaking the laws of physics. Instead, it shows that our understanding of the laws of physics is incomplete and requires further development.

The laws of physics are ideas, not physical laws

The laws of physics are not physical laws, but rather ideas and approximations that are constantly being refined as our understanding of the universe evolves. These laws are not set in stone, and can be broken or proven wrong.

The Big Bang theory, for example, contradicts the law of conservation of mass and Newton's First Law of Motion. However, this does not mean that the Big Bang theory is incorrect. Instead, it highlights the limitations of our current understanding of physics and the need for further exploration and refinement of our existing laws.

The laws of physics are not universally applicable, especially in extreme conditions such as those present during the Big Bang. In such cases, the laws of physics can break down, indicating that our current understanding is incomplete and requires further development. This does not mean that physics cannot be used to describe these phenomena, but rather that our existing laws are insufficient to provide meaningful answers.

For instance, the concept of singularities, such as black holes and the Big Bang, presents challenges to our current laws of physics. Singularities are problematic because various quantities, such as density, become infinite, and infinity is not a physical quantity. This suggests that our physics is not yet advanced enough to fully comprehend these extreme phenomena.

Furthermore, the laws of physics are context-dependent and may not hold true in all situations. For example, Newton's laws of motion are approximations that work well in everyday situations but fail when dealing with extreme conditions involving high energy, mass, or velocity. Similarly, the First Law of Thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only applies in closed systems. On a universal scale, energy conservation may not hold, especially during the early stages of the universe following the Big Bang.

In conclusion, the laws of physics are not absolute or immutable. They are subject to change and refinement as our understanding of the universe evolves. The Big Bang theory highlights the limitations of our current laws and serves as a catalyst for further exploration and development of our physical laws.

The Big Bang theory doesn't break the law of conservation of energy

The Big Bang theory does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed, only converted or changed. The total energy in the universe has remained constant in all observations, even if its density has not.

The First Law of Thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another, is not violated by the Big Bang. This is because the First Law applies to loss of work due to heat, and therefore does not apply to the Big Bang.

The Big Bang theory posits that at the beginning of time (t=0), the universe was in a hot, dense state. All the energy and volume of the universe was in a single point. The "Bang" was the expansion of the universe, which precipitated the beginning of time. Nothing was created or destroyed. All that exists now existed then, merely in a different form.

The concept of "before" does not apply to the Big Bang because time did not exist before it. The Big Bang was the start of time, and so there is no "before" to consider. The universe has "always" been, where "always" is a measurement of time.

The Law of Conservation of Energy appears to still be valid in the context of the Big Bang. While there are aspects of the Big Bang that we do not yet understand, the Law of Conservation of Energy does not appear to be contradicted by the available evidence.

The Big Bang theory doesn't break Newton's first law of motion

The Big Bang theory does not break Newton's first law of motion. The first law of motion states that an object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. However, this law applies to objects within the universe, not the universe itself. The Big Bang theory describes the expansion of the universe, not the movement of objects within it. Therefore, it does not contradict Newton's first law.

The Big Bang theory proposes that the universe originated from a singularity, a point of infinite density. This singularity expanded rapidly, giving rise to the universe as we know it today. The concept of singularities is challenging for physics, as it involves quantities that become infinite, and infinity is not a physical quantity. This means that our current laws of physics break down when applied to singularities like black holes and the Big Bang.

However, this does not mean that the Big Bang theory breaks Newton's laws of motion. The laws of physics that we use today, including Newton's laws, are incredibly successful in describing the behaviour of objects within the universe. They allow us to send rockets to other planets, build skyscrapers, and design technologies that improve our lives. These laws are the result of centuries of scientific inquiry and experimentation.

Nevertheless, when it comes to the extreme conditions present during the Big Bang, our current laws of physics fall short. This is not because the Big Bang theory is wrong but because our understanding of physics is not yet advanced enough to fully explain these phenomena. The laws of physics that we use today are approximations that work exceptionally well for everyday situations. However, in the extreme conditions of the early universe, these approximations break down, and we need a more complete theory to describe what happened.

In summary, the Big Bang theory does not contradict Newton's first law of motion. The first law applies to objects within the universe, while the Big Bang describes the expansion of the universe itself. Our current laws of physics, including Newton's laws, are incredibly successful in their domain of applicability but fall short when applied to the extreme conditions of the early universe. This is not a failure of the Big Bang theory but a sign that we need to continue advancing our understanding of physics.

Frequently asked questions