Lobbyists' Influence: Bills Before Becoming Laws

Lobbying is a common practice in the United States, where interest groups hire well-connected advocates or lobbyists to argue for specific legislation. Lobbying is often perceived negatively and viewed as a form of bribery, but it is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Lobbying Disclosure Act. Lobbying is an important lever for a productive government as it provides access to government legislatures and acts as an educational tool. However, lobbying can also be detrimental to the lawmaking process, as lobbyists can offer members of Congress lucrative job offers and use money and gifts to gain influence. In recent years, there has been an increase in lobbying by foreign entities, which has led to concerns about national security and further criticism of the practice.

Lobbyists can write laws themselves

Lobbyists can and do write laws themselves. Each year, lobbyists introduce thousands of bills, often written by corporations, industry groups, and think tanks. These bills are then copied in state capitols across the country, quietly advancing the agenda of their writers.

A two-year investigation by the Center for Public Integrity, USA TODAY, and The Arizona Republic found that at least 10,000 bills were almost entirely copied from model legislation and introduced nationwide over the past eight years. Over 2,100 of these bills were signed into law.

The investigation examined nearly 1 million bills using a computer algorithm designed to detect similarities in language. This search found that the phenomenon of copycat legislation is far larger than just these 10,000 bills.

Model bills have been used to limit access to abortion, restrict the rights of protesters, and make it harder for injured consumers to sue corporations. They have also been used to override the will of local voters and their elected leaders. For example, cities and counties have banned plastic bags, only to have these bans made illegal through model bills passed in state legislatures.

Industry groups have had extraordinary success with copycat bills. Over 4,000 such measures were introduced during the period analyzed, with one bill in Wisconsin limiting compensation for injured nursing home residents.

The relationship between groups writing model legislation and lawmakers introducing them is a marriage of convenience. Special interests provide lawmakers with fully-formed bills to put their names on, and in return, they gain dependable donors to their campaigns.

Lobbyists can bribe members of Congress with lucrative job offers

Lobbying is a legal and important part of the political process in the United States. It is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. Lobbying is the act of undertaking public campaigns to pressure governments into taking specific actions. It is distinct from bribery as it does not ask for special treatment but is instead a way to influence legislative action that affects all citizens.

That being said, lobbying can have a negative impact on the political process when lobbyists use their financial resources to unduly influence politicians. This can happen in several ways, one of which is when lobbyists bribe members of Congress with lucrative job offers. This practice is known as "the revolving door". In the 1970s, less than 5% of retiring legislators became lobbyists, but now, half of retiring senators and a third of retiring House members do.

Through the "revolving door", lobbyists offer members of Congress and their staffers lucrative jobs at their firms or their clients' companies. These negotiations often take place while the politicians are still in office and working for the American people. With multi-million-dollar future salaries on the line, members of Congress are incentivized to protect the interests of the lobbyists who will one day be their employers.

Former lobbyist Jack Abramoff described the process as follows: "I would say to [the Member], 'When you're done working on the Hill, we'd very much like you to consider coming to work for us.' The moment I said that, we owned them. And what does that mean? Every request from our office, every request of our clients, everything that we want, they're gonna do."

The "revolving door" between Capitol Hill and K Street (a metonym for the Washington, D.C. lobbyist community) has become a lucrative pipeline for former members of Congress. Even those who don't register as lobbyists can deploy their legislative experience and contacts to guide outsiders through advocacy campaigns and political risk.

The "revolving door" phenomenon has led to concerns about the influence of lobbyists on legislation. While lobbying itself is a legal and important part of the political process, the use of financial incentives to unduly influence politicians can distort the democratic process and lead to policies that benefit special interests rather than the public interest.

Lobbyists can organise swanky fundraisers for elected officials

Lobbyists can be a powerful force in politics, and one of the ways they can influence the political process is by organising fundraisers for elected officials. This is a common practice, as highlighted by former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who noted that it is an effective way to buy influence for their clients without breaking any laws.

Here's how it typically works: let's say a large bank wants to influence a senator on the banking committee to vote in their favour on an upcoming bill. Directly donating to a senator's reelection campaign is illegal, so instead, the bank hires a lobbying firm. The lobbying firm then organises a fundraiser that raises $100,000 for the senator's reelection campaign. During the fundraiser, the lobbyist can discuss their client's interests with the senator's staff, building a relationship and making their preferences known.

The senator benefits from the additional funds for their campaign and knows which way to vote if they want to continue receiving financial support. The lobbyist's client benefits from having their interests represented and potentially shaped into law. This practice is not limited to one political party, as top lobbying firms work with both Republicans and Democrats.

This type of influence can have a significant impact on legislation, as lobbyists are often able to shape laws to favour their clients' interests. For example, in the 2014 omnibus budget deal, lobbyists for Citigroup were able to include language in the bill that put taxpayers on the hook for bank bailouts. This demonstrates the power lobbyists can wield by organising fundraisers and the potential consequences for the public.

While lobbying is not inherently evil, and individuals and groups have the right to advocate for their interests, the potential for corruption is a significant concern. Reforms have been proposed to address these issues, but lobbyists continue to play a significant role in influencing lawmakers and shaping legislation.

Lobbyists can act as educators and advisors to lawmakers

Lobbyists are usually well-connected and highly-skilled advocates with close connections to members of Congress, regulators, specialists, and others. They understand strategy and have excellent communication skills. Lobbyists can be specialists with expertise in a particular set of issues. They can also be lawyers skilled in writing legislation, helping to draft laws.

Lobbying is a practical necessity for firms that live and die by government decisions. It is a sound money-making strategy for federal contractors. The largest contractor, Lockheed Martin Corporation, received almost $40 billion in federal contracts in 2003-2004 and spent $16 million on lobbying expenses and campaign donations. For each dollar of lobbying investment, the firm received $2,517 in revenues.

Lobbying is a way for citizens to engage with lawmakers on important issues. It is a fundamental right guaranteed by the First Amendment in the Constitution as the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Lobbying is legally protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the Lobbying Disclosure Act.

Lobbyists can put together diverse coalitions to sway public opinion

Lobbyists can play a crucial role in helping policymakers better understand the potential impact of a law on constituents and interest groups. They do this by putting together diverse coalitions to sway public opinion.

Lobbying is a paid activity in which special interest groups hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in decision-making bodies. Lobbying is an important lever for a productive government. Without it, governments would struggle to sort out the many competing interests of its citizens. Lobbying provides access to government legislatures that no single individual could possibly hope to achieve. Lobbying brings issues to the forefront of the government's attention, otherwise, the government can fall into an "out of sight, out of mind" trap. Lobbying also brings access to issues, and any issue brought to a legislature's attention will be a focal point of a legislature's constituents.

Lobbyists can put together diverse coalitions of organizations and people, sometimes including lawmakers and corporations, and the whole effort may be considered a lobby. For example, in the abortion issue, there is a "pro-choice lobby" and a "pro-life lobby". These groups have been defined as "sustainable coalitions of similarly situated individual organizations in pursuit of like-minded goals". Larger, more diverse, and wealthier coalitions tend to be more effective, as the "strength in numbers" principle often applies.

Lobbyists can also sway public opinion by manipulating the mass media. They do this by cultivating contacts with reporters and editors and encouraging them to write editorials and cover stories to influence public opinion, which may have the secondary effect of influencing Congress. According to analyst Ken Kollman, it is easier to sway public opinion than a congressional staff member, as it is possible to bombard the public with "half-truths, distortion, scare tactics, and misinformation". Kollman suggests that lobbyists should have two goals: communicate to policymakers that there is public support behind an issue, and increase public support for that issue among constituents.

Frequently asked questions