Sharia Law In The Us: Could It Happen?

Sharia, or Islamic law, is a set of religious commandments and values that guide Muslims in various aspects of life. While it is often associated with harsh punishments and restrictions on women's rights, these interpretations are not representative of how most Muslims understand Sharia. In the United States, there has been a growing opposition to Sharia, fueled by misconceptions and fears that it could replace American law. This has led to some states passing measures to restrict judges from considering Sharia or foreign law in their courts. However, it is important to note that American Muslims do not seek to replace the US Constitution with Sharia and understand it as a personal religious obligation rather than something to be enforced by the government.

The compatibility of Sharia with American law and values

Sharia is a body of religious law that forms a part of the Islamic tradition based on scriptures of Islam, particularly the Quran and Hadith. In Arabic, Sharia translates to "path to water", reflecting the concept that Sharia is divine guidance to help humanity draw close to God and live in kindness and justice.

Sharia is often mistranslated as "Islamic law", but a more accurate term for this in Arabic is "fiqh", which refers to the human interpretation and application of Sharia. Sharia is derived from the Quran and Sunnah (prophetic tradition) by qualified scholars who use an interpretative process that includes reasoning by analogy and scholarly consensus.

Sharia addresses both personal and communal aspects of life. It can be divided into two broad areas: guidance in religious worship and guidance in worldly matters. The former is the central focus of Islam, while the latter includes visiting the sick, taking care of parents, marriage, inheritance, and business affairs, among other things.

Sharia is compatible with American law and values in some respects, but not in others. For example, Sharia is compatible with the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which allows for freedom of belief and religious practice, as long as adherents respect others' rights. Sharia is also compatible with the US Constitution in that it requires Muslims to obey "the law of the land" of the country they live in.

However, Sharia is not compatible with American law and values in other respects. For instance, Sharia is exceptionally broad as a legal system, regulating not only public behaviour but also private behaviour and beliefs. Compared to other legal codes, Sharia also prioritises punishment over rehabilitation and favours corporal and capital punishments over incarceration.

Sharia is also largely incompatible with Western concepts of human rights. While Muslim interpretations of Sharia vary, the authoritative sources of Sharia, the Quran and Hadith, show that Islamic scripture affirms most of what are today considered human rights. However, these rights are not absolute and must be understood in relation to other individuals' rights and the public good.

Sharia is also largely incompatible with gender equality. While women's rights under Sharia differ according to the interpretation of Sharia in a given community, the authoritative sources of Sharia accepted by all Muslims, the Quran and Hadith, clearly uphold basic rights for women. At a time when women had little economic or personal agency, Islamic teachings gave women the right to seek knowledge, earn money, keep what they earn, and inherit—rights not fully granted to women in Europe until the 19th or 20th century. However, there are still many ways in which Sharia disadvantages women. For example, a woman's testimony in court carries half the weight of a man's, and a female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.

The role of religious tribunals in the US

Religious tribunals have a long history in the United States, with the Roman Catholic Church alone operating nearly 200 diocesan tribunals. These tribunals handle a range of cases, including an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments each year. Similarly, many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts to obtain religious divorces, resolve business conflicts, and settle other disputes with fellow Jews. Muslims also appeal to Islamic clerics to resolve marital disputes and other disagreements with fellow Muslims.

While religious tribunals often operate without much public notice or controversy, there have been occasions where issues involving religious law or religious courts have garnered media attention. For example, the handling of clergy sexual abuse cases under Catholic canon law has come under scrutiny. Additionally, there have been public protests against Orthodox Jewish men who refused to grant their wives a religious divorce. In recent years, there have also been bills introduced in over 30 state legislatures aimed at banning the use of Islamic law (Sharia) or restricting the application of religious or foreign law in general.

Despite the tensions and controversies surrounding religious tribunals, they continue to play a significant role in the lives of many religious Americans. They provide a forum for grievance resolution and mediation within faith traditions, promoting reconciliation and forgiveness. Additionally, religious tribunals offer a way for religious individuals to live according to their faith and values while still respecting the laws and values of the broader American society.

The status of Sharia in the UK

In the United Kingdom, Sharia has become a political issue. A "One law for all" campaign seeks to ban Sharia councils, arguing that this is "the only way to end discrimination suffered by Muslim women".

There are around 30 Sharia "councils" in the UK, but these are not courts of law. The Sharia councils' decisions are based on Islamic religious laws and cannot overrule the decisions of UK courts or make decisions that are contrary to UK law.

The councils, which are typically panels of Islamic scholars, serve as informal bodies issuing religious rulings, particularly on marriages and divorces.

The UK government maintains a clear position on the role of Sharia law in Britain: "Sharia law does not form any part of the law in England and Wales," a government spokesman stated.

However, Sharia law has been normalised in some areas. For example, an app allows Muslim men in England and Wales to create Islamic wills, with a drop-down menu enabling them to specify between one and four wives.

Previous attempts at regulation have faced resistance. Theresa May's government, for instance, commissioned an independent review but refused to implement a regulator, fearing it would legitimise councils as alternatives to British law.

The enforcement of Sharia in US courts

Sharia, or Islamic law, is a set of religious commandments and sacred laws that guide Muslims in various aspects of life. While it is often associated with harsh punishments and restrictions on women's rights, most Muslims worldwide follow Sharia only in their private religious practices.

In the United States, Sharia is not recognised as a valid juridical system. However, there have been concerns about the potential influence of Sharia in US courts, with more than half a dozen states passing measures to stop their courts from considering foreign, international, or religious laws. These measures are often referred to as "Sharia bans". As of 2014, states that have passed such bans include Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee.

The debate around Sharia in US courts is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, opponents of Sharia argue that it is a totalitarian system that infringes on human choice and is incompatible with Western democracy and values. They worry that the influence of Sharia in US courts could lead to the implementation of harsh criminal punishments and restrictions on the rights of women and minority groups.

On the other hand, defenders of religious freedom argue that Sharia bans single out the Islamic religion and make its adherents vulnerable to harassment and persecution for engaging in peaceful religious practices. They also point out that direct consultation of Sharia law in US jurisprudence is relatively rare and generally limited to circumstances where the government is accommodating the religious beliefs of specific individuals, mainly in matters of arbitration and family law.

In reality, the enforcement of Sharia in US courts is highly unlikely. Muslims make up only 1-2% of the American population, and there is no evidence that the substitution of US law with Sharia is happening or even being contemplated. Additionally, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects the free exercise of religion, allowing Muslims to practice their faith as long as they respect the rights of others.

Furthermore, Sharia itself requires Muslims to obey the laws of the land in which they reside. Most American Muslims and scholars of Islam believe that they do not need to rely on Islamic law to prosecute crimes, as the American judicial system is fast, efficient, and humane. As a result, Islamic law in the US primarily governs aspects of private life, such as marriage, inheritance, and business affairs.

In conclusion, while the debate around Sharia in US courts is heated and often fuelled by misconceptions, the actual enforcement of Sharia in the US legal system is highly unlikely. American Muslims follow Sharia voluntarily and privately, and any religious law must always yield to state or federal law.

The impact of Sharia on women's rights

Sharia, or Islamic law, is derived from the Quran and the teachings and life of the Prophet Muhammad. It is a broad set of ethical principles that guide Muslims in various aspects of life, including personal religious observances, marriage, inheritance, and business affairs. While it does include guidelines on crime and punishment, the interpretation of Sharia is flexible and subject to the interpretation of religious scholars, who may arrive at different conclusions.

In the context of women's rights, Sharia has been portrayed as regressive, with critics citing cases of women being forced into marriages, punished for adultery, or restricted from leaving their homes or working outside of them. For instance, during the Taliban's rule in Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, women were barred from education and work and were required to cover themselves from head to toe in public. This interpretation of Sharia sparked fears and concerns among women's rights activists and international observers.

However, it is important to note that Sharia is open to interpretation, and many Muslim women do not regard it as incompatible with their rights. In countries like Somalia and Somaliland, women's rights activists have used Sharia to advocate for gender equality. They argue that Sharia encourages a diversity of interpretations and that Muslims "can find support for almost everything" in the Quran. These activists work to educate their communities about women's rights in Islam, such as the right to education and participation in sports. They also share harrowing stories of the harmful practices resulting from patriarchal interpretations of Sharia, such as child marriage and female genital mutilation.

In the United States, the impact of Sharia on women's rights is not a significant concern, as the country's legal system and culture take precedence. American Muslims follow Sharia on a voluntary basis, respecting the limits set by American secular law. Additionally, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of religion, allowing Muslims to practice their faith without infringing on the rights of others.

Frequently asked questions