Texas Abortion Law: How Did We Get Here?

Texas has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. Abortion is illegal in Texas unless a physician determines that it is necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant person or prevent a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function. Texas's abortion laws do not provide an exception for cases of rape or incest.

The state's abortion laws are the result of a trigger law passed in July 2021 that came into effect on 25 August 2022, following the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

The role of the Supreme Court in overturning Roe v. Wade

The Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a landmark ruling that recognised a woman's constitutional right to privacy and, by extension, her right to choose whether to have an abortion. The Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protected a woman's right to privacy and, by extension, her right to choose whether to have an abortion. This right was not absolute, however, and had to be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life. The Court created a trimester framework to balance these interests, allowing states to impose minimal restrictions in the first trimester, increasing regulations in the second, and banning abortions from the third trimester onwards, except when necessary to protect the mother's life or health.

The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in 2022 overruled Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, ending the constitutional right to abortion. The Court held that the substantive right to abortion was not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history or tradition" and was not a right when the Due Process Clause was ratified in 1868. The Court's decision in Dobbs gave states the power to ban abortion and allowed Texas to enforce its trigger law, which had been passed in July 2021 and came into effect on August 25, 2022, banning abortion in most cases.

The impact of the Texas Heartbeat Act

The Texas Heartbeat Act has had a profound impact on abortion access and reproductive rights in the state, with far-reaching consequences for women's health, autonomy, and society as a whole.

Undermining Women's Autonomy: The Act denies women the ability to make decisions about their sexual and reproductive health by prohibiting abortions after the detection of a "fetal heartbeat", which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This narrow gestational limit often falls before many women are even aware of their pregnancy, and even if they are, they may not be able to obtain a lawful abortion within the timeframe due to appointment availability. This effectively undermines a woman's right to choose and make informed decisions about her body and future.

Curtailing Safe and Evidence-Based Healthcare: The law has significantly reduced access to safe and evidence-based abortion services in Texas. Prior to the Act, an estimated 55,000 abortions were performed annually in the state. In the first month of the law being in force, there was a 60% decline in abortions performed. This has particularly impacted vulnerable and marginalised populations, including low-income women, women of colour, and those who have to travel long distances to access in-clinic care.

Increased Likelihood of Self-Managed Abortions: The restrictive nature of the Texas Heartbeat Act may lead to an increase in women seeking to self-manage their abortions, potentially resulting in unsafe procedures. Restrictive abortion laws are associated with the highest prevalence of unsafe abortion practices. Self-managed abortions can lead to medical complications and even abortion-related mortality.

Establishment of a Vigilante System: By enabling private enforcement, the Act incentivises strangers to spy on women and encourages a form of vigilante justice. It creates a pathway for litigation that intimidates and dissuades medical practitioners from providing abortion care. The threat of litigation may deter health professionals from acting in accordance with clinical standards and could compromise their ability to act in the best interests of the patient.

Undermining Medical Expertise: The Act's overhanging threat of litigation may deter health professionals from providing abortions, even in cases of medical emergency or when continuing the pregnancy poses significant risks to the mother's health. The ambiguity around the law's medical emergency exception and the potential for legal scrutiny may lead to clinical decision-making being influenced by fear of retribution rather than the best interests of the patient.

Impact on Society: The Texas Heartbeat Act has had a broader impact on society beyond just women's health. It has sparked debates about the ethics of abortion, the role of the state in enforcing moral values, and the limits of legislative power. Additionally, the Act's unique enforcement mechanism, which relies solely on private citizens bringing civil lawsuits, has set a precedent for other states and potentially other areas of law. This has raised concerns about the erosion of constitutional rights and the role of the judiciary in protecting those rights.

The Human Life Protection Act and its implications

The Human Life Protection Act, also known as HB 1280, is a trigger law that was signed into effect in Texas on June 6, 2021. This law was enacted in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The Act bans abortions in Texas, with exceptions to save the mother's life or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function". However, the law is written ambiguously, and life-threatening or harmful pregnancies do not explicitly constitute an exception. This has prompted expecting mothers with health complications to leave the state or give birth while jeopardizing their health.

The Human Life Protection Act makes it a first-degree felony to provide an abortion leading to the death of the unborn child, except when there is a risk of death or substantial impairment of a major bodily function of the mother. The Act also allows for civil lawsuits to be brought against anyone who performs, induces, or aids an abortion in violation of the statute. The minimum liability for each abortion performed or assisted in violation of the Act is $10,000, plus costs and attorneys' fees.

The implications of the Human Life Protection Act are far-reaching and have had a significant impact on abortion access and reproductive rights in Texas. The Act has effectively banned most abortions in the state, with limited exceptions. This has led to a decrease in the number of abortion clinics in Texas and an increase in the number of women seeking abortions in the second trimester. Additionally, the vague nature of the law has caused confusion and concern among medical professionals, who fear being prosecuted for providing abortion care.

The Act has also had a significant impact on women's health and safety. Women with high-risk pregnancies are now forced to carry their pregnancies to term, even when it poses a risk to their health. This has resulted in an increase in maternal mortality and infant mortality rates in Texas. Furthermore, the lack of access to safe and legal abortions has led to an increase in illegal and unsafe abortions, putting women's lives at risk.

The Human Life Protection Act has also had legal and political implications. Several legal challenges have been filed against the Act, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution and infringes on women's reproductive rights. These challenges have largely been unsuccessful, with the Act being upheld by the Texas Supreme Court. The Act has also sparked political debates and protests across the state, with cities like Austin, Dallas, and Houston enacting resolutions to deprioritize the enforcement of the state's abortion laws.

Overall, the Human Life Protection Act has had far-reaching implications for abortion access, reproductive rights, women's health, and legal and political landscapes in Texas. The Act has effectively banned most abortions in the state, limited exceptions, and sparked legal and political controversies. The implications of the Act continue to unfold, and it remains a highly contentious issue in Texas and beyond.

The ambiguity of Texas abortion law

This ambiguity has led to a negative impact on the state's economy, with an estimated loss of $14.5 billion in revenue each year. It has also caused expecting mothers with health complications to leave the state or give birth while jeopardizing their health. The lack of clarity in the law has resulted in doctors facing difficult decisions regarding patient care, as they fear stiff penalties for misinterpretation of the exceptions.

The Texas Heartbeat Act, passed in May 2021, further contributes to the ambiguity by banning abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which typically occurs around six weeks into pregnancy. This act is enforced through civil lawsuits brought by private individuals, making it challenging to challenge the law's constitutionality before it takes effect.

The ambiguity in the Texas abortion law has sparked legal battles, with several lawsuits filed by individuals and organizations seeking clarification and challenging the restrictions. The state's complex legal landscape regarding abortion has caused uncertainty and confusion, impacting individuals' access to reproductive healthcare and their ability to make informed decisions.

The ongoing debate and ambiguity surrounding Texas abortion law highlight the need for clear and concise legislation that considers the health and well-being of individuals while also addressing the concerns of various stakeholders.

The influence of Governor Greg Abbott

Governor Greg Abbott has been a prominent figure in the passage and enforcement of Texas's abortion laws. As a member of the Republican Party, Abbott has supported and promoted a conservative agenda that includes measures against abortion. Here are some key ways in which Governor Abbott has influenced Texas's abortion law:

• Texas Heartbeat Act: Governor Abbott signed the Texas Heartbeat Act (SB 8) into law in May 2021. This act banned abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This act was strategically designed to evade pre-enforcement challenges based on Roe v. Wade by relying solely on enforcement by private individuals through civil lawsuits.
• Support for Expectant Mothers: Governor Abbott has prioritized supporting expectant mothers by providing necessary resources and alternatives to abortion. He has allocated funding for programs like the Alternatives to Abortion program, which offers counseling, mentoring, and material assistance to mothers in need.
• Opposition to Roe v. Wade: Governor Abbott has been a vocal opponent of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that guaranteed the federal constitutional right to abortion. He welcomed the overturning of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, stating that it "reinstated the right of states to protect innocent, unborn children."
• Legislative Influence: As the governor of Texas, Abbott has worked closely with the Texas legislature to pass several abortion-related bills. He has signed numerous bills into law, including the Texas Heartbeat Act and legislation preventing women from mail-ordering abortion medication after seven weeks of pregnancy.
• Conservative Agenda: Governor Abbott has promoted a conservative agenda that aligns with his opposition to abortion. This includes lenient gun laws, support for law enforcement, election reform, and fighting illegal immigration.
• Political Campaigns: Abbott's political campaigns have reflected his stance on abortion. During his reelection campaign in 2022, he emphasized "culture war" issues and promoted conservative policies. He has also received significant campaign contributions from fossil fuel industries, which have influenced his policy decisions.

Frequently asked questions