Site Advertising Engineering: Unlawful Money-Making Schemes

Site advertising engineering can break the law in several ways. Firstly, advertisements must be truthful, evidence-based, and non-deceptive. False or misleading claims are illegal and can result in enforcement actions or civil lawsuits. Additionally, there are specific rules for advertising to children, with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) prohibiting the collection of personal information from children under 13 without parental permission. Furthermore, ads must not be self-laudatory and should only use dignified and reputable media to avoid bringing disrepute to the profession. Recent years have seen an increase in class-action lawsuits against brands for false advertising, with companies like Starbucks, Poppi, and Liquid I.V. facing legal repercussions. With the rise of digital advertising, regulations are also evolving to address concerns around consumer privacy, with laws like the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) giving consumers more control over their data.

Misleading claims

One form of misleading claim is a deceptive product description. This occurs when a product is described as having certain features, benefits, qualities, or ingredients that it does not actually have. For example, claiming that a product is "organic" or "natural" when it is not, or falsely stating that a product has scientific support or endorsement from authorities. Misleading illustrations or photographs can also fall into this category.

Deceptive pricing practices are another common issue. This can include hidden fees or surcharges that are not included in the advertised price, causing the final price paid by the consumer to be higher than expected. "Going out of business" sales may also involve deceptive pricing, with liquidators inflating prices and claiming that they have been marked down.

Comparative advertising can also be misleading if it is inaccurate or does not compare products fairly. Making vague or ambiguous claims, such as "stronger" or "better," without providing proper context can be deceptive.

Businesses must also be careful not to make misleading claims about future matters. They must have reasonable grounds for making predictions or projections and adequately address the uncertainties and variables involved.

To avoid making misleading claims, businesses should provide current and correct information, use easy-to-understand language, be specific in their claims, back up claims with facts and evidence, and keep consumers updated if things change.

Privacy breaches

The complexity of the online advertising ecosystem, involving advertisers, publishers, and various intermediaries, has drawn attention from privacy regulators worldwide. This is due to the vast amounts of personal data being collected, shared, and used for targeted advertising. For instance, tracking technologies like cookies and pixels are commonly employed to gather information about users' online behavior, which is then utilized to deliver tailored advertisements. While this practice can enhance the relevance of ads, it also raises concerns about potential privacy breaches and the unauthorized use of personal information.

To address these concerns, various jurisdictions have implemented laws and regulations. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe sets stringent requirements for transparency and consent, mandating valid, granular, and freely given consent for data processing. Additionally, the ePrivacy Directive requires organizations to provide users with information about cookie usage and obtain opt-in consent before setting them up. Non-compliance with these regulations can result in significant fines and legal consequences.

In the United States, there is a growing trend toward regulating online tracking and providing consumers with more control over their personal information. While there is no comprehensive federal privacy law, individual states like California have enacted strict privacy laws, such as the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which grants consumers the right to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. The CPRA also imposes specific contractual obligations on companies, restricting their ability to position themselves as mere service providers.

To further protect consumers' privacy, companies are encouraged to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures. This includes conducting regular data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) to identify and mitigate risks associated with personal data processing. Additionally, developing a comprehensive data governance framework is crucial to ensure compliance with evolving privacy laws and to maintain stakeholder trust. Failure to adhere to these standards can result in legal repercussions and damage to an organization's reputation.

The impact of privacy breaches extends beyond legal consequences. Consumers whose personal information is exposed may face identity theft, financial loss, and other detrimental effects. For instance, in the healthcare sector, medical identity theft can have direct implications for patients' physical health. Therefore, it is imperative that companies prioritize data security and implement robust measures to safeguard personal information, such as encryption and access controls.

To summarize, privacy breaches are a critical issue in the digital era, and addressing them is essential to protect consumers' rights and maintain trust in the digital ecosystem. By adhering to legal requirements, implementing robust security measures, and prioritizing data protection, organizations can reduce the risk of privacy breaches and foster a more secure online environment for all stakeholders.

Targeted ads based on ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation

In recent years, Facebook (now Meta) has been under scrutiny for its advertising practices, particularly in relation to targeting users based on sensitive information. In November 2021, the company announced that it would no longer allow advertisers to target users based on their history of posting, reading, or liking content related to subjects such as sexual orientation, religion, and political beliefs. This change was in response to feedback from civil rights experts, policymakers, and other stakeholders, who raised concerns about the potential for advertisers to abuse the targeting options available on the platform.

Google also has strict policies regarding personalized advertising. They prohibit targeting users based on sensitive interest categories, which include identity and belief systems. This means that advertisers cannot target users based on their sexual orientation, political affiliation, religious beliefs, race, or ethnicity.

These moves by major digital platforms reflect a growing awareness of the potential for abuse and the negative impact on users when advertising targets sensitive aspects of their identity.

False endorsements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has outlined several guidelines regarding endorsements, including the requirement that all endorsements must be truthful and evidence-based. Using false endorsements or testimonials, even those purported to be from everyday people, can be a violation of FTC rules. According to the FTC's Revised Endorsement Guidelines, businesses cannot make up fake customers and put words in their mouths. Additionally, the FTC generally prohibits compensating customers for their endorsement without disclosing this fact in the advertisement.

Businesses should also be aware that false endorsements can lead to negative publicity and damage their reputation. It is essential to comply with FTC guidelines and obtain proper authorization when using endorsements in advertising to avoid legal consequences and maintain a positive brand image.

Furthermore, the rise of social media has blurred the line between authentic content and advertising, leading to an increase in deceptive endorsements. The FTC is committed to holding advertisers accountable and has issued Notices of Penalty Offenses to hundreds of companies, warning them of significant civil penalties for using endorsements to deceive consumers.

To summarize, false endorsements are not only unethical but also illegal and can result in severe consequences for businesses. It is crucial for companies to adhere to FTC guidelines, be transparent, and obtain proper authorization when using endorsements in their marketing and advertising campaigns.

Unfair or deceptive fees

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a rule to address this issue, which would require businesses to disclose the total price of goods or services, including all mandatory fees. The rule would also prohibit businesses from misrepresenting the nature and purpose of fees.

The FTC has received comments from various industries, including live-event ticketing, short-term lodging, and restaurants, which have all expressed concerns about unfair or deceptive fee practices. The FTC is currently reviewing these comments and will make a decision on whether to finalize the proposed rule.

Frequently asked questions