The Evolution Of Laws: Amendments Explained

The process of amending a law varies depending on the type of law and the jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the process of amending the Constitution is outlined in Article V, which states that an amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. On the other hand, a bill is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law, which can be introduced by a member of the Senate or House of Representatives. Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee, which will research, discuss, and make changes to it. The bill then goes through a process of voting and if passed, it is presented to the President for approval.

The process of amending a law

In the United States, the lawmaking branch of the federal government is Congress, which consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The process of amending a law can be initiated by a bill, which is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law. A bill can be introduced by a sitting member of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives, be proposed during their election campaign, or be petitioned by citizens or citizen groups. Once a bill is introduced, it goes through a multi-step process before it can become a law. Here is an overview of the key steps involved in amending a law:

• Committee Assignment and Consideration: Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to it. This committee plays a crucial role in shaping the bill before it moves forward.
• Voting in the First Chamber: After the committee has finished its work, the bill is put before the first chamber (either the House of Representatives or the Senate) for a vote. If the bill passes this vote, it moves on to the other chamber.
• Voting in the Second Chamber: In the second chamber, the bill goes through a similar process of research, discussion, changes, and voting. This step ensures that both chambers have the opportunity to provide input and make amendments.
• Resolving Differences: If the bill passes both chambers, the two versions need to be reconciled. This involves working out any differences between the two versions and creating a single version that both chambers can agree on.
• Presidential Consideration: The bill is then presented to the President for consideration. The President has the power to approve the bill and sign it into law or to veto it.
• Override of Veto: If the President vetoes the bill, Congress has the power to override that veto. If both chambers vote to override the veto, the bill becomes a law despite the President's objection.
• Enactment: Once the bill has been approved by both chambers of Congress and any potential veto has been addressed, it becomes a law. This law is then published and made known to the public.

It is important to note that the process of amending a law can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the type of law being amended. Additionally, there may be additional steps or requirements involved, such as seeking input from relevant departments and agencies, holding public hearings, and following specific rules and procedures outlined in the Constitution.

Amending the Constitution

Amending the Constitution of the United States is a separate process from amending regular laws. The authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. An amendment to the Constitution may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. If an amendment is proposed, it must then be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become part of the Constitution. This process ensures that any changes to the nation's foundational document are carefully considered and require broad support.

Who can propose an amendment

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.

A bill is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law. The idea for a bill can come from a sitting member of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives or be proposed during their election campaign. Bills can also be petitioned by people or citizen groups who recommend a new or amended law to a member of Congress that represents them.

In the case of a bill, once it is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill. The bill is then put before that chamber to be voted on. If the bill passes one body of Congress, it goes to the other body to go through a similar process of research, discussion, changes, and voting. Once both bodies vote to accept a bill, they must work out any differences between the two versions. Then both chambers vote on the same version of the bill. If it passes, they present it to the president.

The president then considers the bill. The president can approve the bill and sign it into law, or refuse to approve a bill. This is called a veto. If the president chooses to veto a bill, in most cases, Congress can vote to override that veto and the bill becomes a law.

In the case of an amendment, if the amendment is proposed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for administering the ratification process. The Archivist has delegated many of the ministerial duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register.

If the amendment is proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures, the Archivist submits the proposed amendment to the States for their consideration by sending a letter of notification to each Governor along with the informational material prepared by the OFR. The Governors then formally submit the amendment to their State legislatures or the state calls for a convention, depending on what Congress has specified.

Ratification of an amendment

The process of amending a law differs depending on the type of law being amended. For example, amending a statute, a contract, or the United States Constitution will each have different procedures.

In the case of amending the United States Constitution, the process is derived from Article V of the Constitution. This process involves two methods. The first method, which has been used for all 27 amendments to the Constitution, involves Congress proposing an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The proposed amendment is then sent to the states for ratification, where it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become part of the Constitution.

The second method, which has never been utilised, involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Any amendment proposed by this convention must also be ratified by three-fourths of the states, either through a vote of the state legislatures or a state convention.

The mode of ratification is determined by Congress, and it is important to note that there is no mention of a time limit for ratification in Article V. However, beginning with the 20th Amendment, Congress has attached a time limit to the ratification of all proposed amendments.

The process of amending a law can be complex and varies depending on the specific law and jurisdiction. It typically involves proposing changes, debating and voting on the proposed changes, and then finalising and implementing the amendments. In the case of the United States Constitution, the process is outlined in Article V and involves Congress, the Archivist of the United States, and the states.

The number of votes required to amend a law

In the United States, for example, amending a federal law typically requires a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. However, amending the Constitution of the United States is a more complex process. According to Article V of the Constitution, an amendment may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 out of 50) to become part of the Constitution.

At the state level in the United States, the process for amending state constitutions can vary. In most states, voters play a role in ratifying proposed amendments, and the specific requirements for approval can differ from state to state. For example, Alabama requires a simple majority vote (50% plus 1) for voters to approve constitutional amendments, while Florida requires a 60% supermajority vote. Additionally, the process for proposing amendments can vary, with some states allowing for legislatively referred amendments, initiated amendments through citizen petitions, constitutional conventions, or commission referrals.

Time limits for ratifying an amendment

The process of amending a law varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific legislative body involved. In the context of amending the Constitution of the United States, there are established procedures and time limits for ratifying amendments.

According to Article V of the US Constitution, the process of amending the Constitution can be initiated by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. Once an amendment is proposed, it is submitted to the states for ratification.

The first method of ratification, which has been used for 26 out of 27 successful amendments, requires three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states) to approve the proposed amendment. This method raises the question of whether Congress can impose a deadline on the states' ratification process.

In the case of Dillon v. Gloss, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution implicitly authorises Congress to set a "definite period" for ratification. The Court upheld a seven-year time limit for the Eighteenth Amendment, which established Prohibition. The Court's decision was based on Congress's power to determine the mode of ratification, implying the authority to specify a deadline.

However, in Coleman v. Miller, the Court suggested that Congress is responsible for promulgating the adoption of an amendment and determining whether ratification occurred within a "reasonable time." Commentators have debated the interpretation of this decision, with some arguing that the Constitution does not grant Congress such a role.

If no deadline is specified by Congress, an amendment remains pending before the states until the required number of states have ratified it. This was demonstrated by the Twenty-Seventh Amendment, which took effect over 200 years after it was proposed. In this case, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) advised that the amendment became part of the Constitution once the Archivist of the United States certified that the necessary number of states had ratified it.

Frequently asked questions