Miscarriage And Abortion: Understanding The Legal Intersection

Abortion laws have a direct impact on how miscarriages are handled, and the legal landscape surrounding this issue is often murky and subject to varying interpretations. In the United States, the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade has left many states with near-total bans on abortion, creating a sense of uncertainty and fear among those who experience pregnancy loss. The laws regarding miscarriage are often vague, and people who miscarry may find themselves in a dangerous legal limbo, unsure of how to handle the remains and worried about potential criminal consequences. This ambiguity has led to concerns that miscarrying patients are no longer seeking treatment in hospitals, instead choosing to make decisions about fetal remains alone at home.

The impact of abortion laws on miscarriage care is a critical issue that affects the physical and mental well-being of those who experience pregnancy loss. It underscores the importance of comprehensive abortion care, which includes the management of miscarriage, induced abortion, and post-abortion care. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes the essential nature of these services and has included them in its list of essential health care services.

Miscarriage management care is delayed or denied

Miscarriage management care is often delayed or denied due to abortion bans and restrictions. This is because, in many states, abortion is only permitted to save the life of the pregnant person, and in some cases, to preserve their health. However, these exceptions are often unworkable in practice and do not always include mental health conditions, which account for 20% of pregnancy-related deaths in the US. As a result, physicians may delay providing miscarriage management care until the pregnant person's condition deteriorates and meets the narrow criteria for an exception.

In some states, abortion laws specify that care for ectopic pregnancies and pregnancy loss is not criminalized. However, most of these states only allow for the removal of a dead fetus or embryo, and pregnant people who are actively miscarrying may be denied care if there is still detectable fetal cardiac activity. This has already led to situations where women experiencing miscarriage have been unable to receive timely and appropriate medical care, increasing their risk of infection and other complications.

The vagueness of abortion laws and the lack of clear guidelines on the handling of fetal remains contribute to the uncertainty and fear experienced by women who have miscarried. The criminalization of miscarriage and the potential for legal consequences further compound the anguish and distress associated with pregnancy loss. The legal landscape surrounding miscarriage is murky, and individuals may not know the best course of action or whom to trust with their concerns.

The restrictions on abortion and the ambiguity surrounding miscarriage management have led to a decrease in individuals seeking medical care. Many miscarrying patients are likely avoiding hospitals altogether and are instead dealing with fetal remains at home, alone, and without proper guidance. This situation is especially challenging for providers, as they navigate the uncertainty of what constitutes legal and safe miscarriage management care.

The delay or denial of miscarriage management care has significant implications for the health and well-being of pregnant individuals. It increases the risk of infection and other medical complications, posing a threat to their physical health. Additionally, the stress and uncertainty associated with delayed or denied care can take a toll on their mental health and well-being.

Criminal consequences for handling of a miscarriage

In the United States, abortion laws have had a significant impact on how miscarriages are handled and perceived, with some women facing criminal charges for their actions following a miscarriage. The laws surrounding miscarriage are often vague, and the line between a miscarriage and an abortion can be blurry, leading to confusion and fear among women and medical professionals.

Criminal Charges for Miscarriage Handling

In recent years, there have been several cases where women have faced criminal charges related to their handling of a miscarriage. One notable case involved Brittany Watts, a 33-year-old woman from Ohio, who was charged with "abuse of a corpse" after miscarrying at home. Watts' pregnancy had been deemed non-viable, and she was arrested two weeks after the miscarriage for how she disposed of the fetal remains. While the charges were eventually dropped, the case sparked concerns about the criminalization of pregnancy and the vague nature of miscarriage laws.

The Impact of Abortion Bans

The increasing number of abortion bans in the United States has contributed to the uncertainty surrounding miscarriage. In states with strict abortion laws, medical professionals may be reluctant to offer miscarriage management, for fear of being accused of performing illegal abortions. This can result in women being denied necessary medical care and left to deal with fetal remains on their own.

The Legal Definition of a "Corpse"

One of the key issues in these cases is the legal definition of a "corpse" and at what point a fetus can be considered a human body. In some states, such as Alabama, a fetus is legally considered a person, which can lead to charges of homicide or manslaughter in the event of a pregnancy loss. The vague language around "fetal personhood" leaves room for interpretation and allows for the prosecution of women who experience a miscarriage or stillbirth.

The Criminalization of Pregnancy Loss

The criminalization of pregnancy loss treats pregnant people as vessels rather than individuals with rights. Women who experience a miscarriage or stillbirth may be blamed and punished for the loss, even though most miscarriages occur due to natural causes. The criminalization of pregnancy loss also disproportionately affects women of color, who already face higher rates of miscarriage and stillbirth due to limited access to prenatal care.

The Impact on Maternal Health

The fear of criminal consequences for handling a miscarriage can have severe implications for maternal health. Women may be less likely to seek necessary prenatal care or medical attention following a miscarriage, potentially leading to severe complications and even death. The criminalization of pregnancy loss also creates a climate of fear and mistrust, making it difficult for women to feel safe seeking medical help during a vulnerable time.

Miscarrying patients avoid hospitals

Abortion bans in the United States have had a profound impact on the way pregnancy care is provided, with doctors delaying or withholding treatment in ways that endanger pregnant women. This has resulted in a climate of fear, where doctors are afraid of facing penalties, including prison sentences, fines, and the loss of their medical licenses. This has led to a situation where miscarrying patients are avoiding hospitals due to concerns about the potential legal consequences and uncertainties surrounding abortion laws.

In states with restrictive abortion laws, miscarrying patients may be denied care if there is still detectable fetal cardiac activity or until the miscarriage poses a direct threat to their life. This creates a dangerous situation where patients are forced to wait until their condition deteriorates to the point where their lives are at risk before receiving the necessary medical attention. The fear of prosecution among medical professionals has led to delays in care, putting the health and lives of pregnant women at risk.

The situation is further complicated by the varying interpretations of abortion laws by different institutions and ethics committees. For example, Catholic-owned hospitals impose restrictions on reproductive health services, and their ethics committees have been known to deny approval for uterine evacuation while fetal heart tones are still present. This has resulted in delayed care or transportation of miscarrying patients to non-Catholic-owned facilities. The conflicting guidelines and protocols have created confusion and uncertainty among both patients and healthcare providers.

The impact of these abortion bans is particularly devastating for women of color and low-income women, who already face higher risks of maternal mortality and morbidity. The restrictions on abortion and miscarriage management disproportionately affect these vulnerable populations, further exacerbating existing disparities in access to healthcare.

The climate of fear and uncertainty caused by restrictive abortion laws has led to miscarrying patients avoiding hospitals altogether. Instead, they are left to make difficult decisions about fetal remains at home, alone, without clear guidance on how to safely dispose of them. The lack of clear and consistent laws regarding the handling of fetal remains adds to the distress and confusion experienced by these women.

Miscarriage remains disposal

In the past, miscarriage remains were often classified as medical waste, and medical facilities were responsible for their disposal. However, with the recent changes in abortion laws, some states have implemented requirements for the handling of fetal remains, including in cases of miscarriage. These requirements mandate that medical facilities treat fetal remains like human bodies and cremate or bury them. While these laws are intended to respect the dignity of the fetus, they have also created confusion and concern for those experiencing miscarriage.

The disposal of miscarriage remains is particularly challenging for those in states with near-total abortion bans. In these states, there is no clear guidance on how to handle and dispose of fetal remains. As a result, individuals may be making decisions about fetal remains at home, without medical guidance or support. This can lead to difficult choices, such as flushing or burying the remains, which can be emotionally distressing and may not be legally permitted.

To navigate this complex situation, it is essential to seek guidance from healthcare professionals or legal experts familiar with the specific state laws and regulations. They can provide advice on the safe and legal disposal of miscarriage remains, ensuring that individuals can make informed decisions during an already difficult time.

Additionally, it is crucial to recognize the emotional and psychological impact of miscarriage. Support services, such as helplines or counselling, can be invaluable in helping individuals cope with the grief and trauma associated with pregnancy loss. It is important to remember that while the legal landscape may be uncertain, prioritizing one's emotional well-being during this challenging time is of utmost importance.

Vague abortion exceptions

For example, in Georgia, the health exception to the abortion ban allows for abortion only when it is necessary to "prevent the death of the pregnant woman or the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function." However, providers challenging this ban argue that the language does not cover cases where the condition is "substantial but reversible," "less than substantial but irreversible," or both "substantial and irreversible" but affecting a non-major bodily function. This ambiguity leaves physicians unsure of how to interpret the exception and provide care within the bounds of the law.

Similarly, in Ohio, the health exception to the six-week abortion ban lists preeclampsia and premature rupture of membranes as qualifying conditions but provides no further details or clinical definitions. This lack of clarity makes it challenging for physicians to determine if other significant health problems fall under the exception. In one case, a pregnant woman with stage 3 melanoma was denied abortion care and cancer treatment because clinicians could not confirm whether her situation met the exception criteria.

The vague and narrow language in abortion exceptions can also deter physicians from practicing in states with restrictive abortion laws. There have been reports of physicians expressing reluctance to relocate to or remaining in these states due to the ambiguity and risk associated with providing abortion care. This can exacerbate existing disparities in access to obstetric care and adversely affect maternal and fetal health outcomes.

The impact of vague abortion exceptions is further compounded by the fact that many abortion bans have multiple and sometimes conflicting exceptions. For instance, in Louisiana, two abortion bans and a 15-week limit are in effect, with differing exceptions. This creates a complex legal landscape that makes it difficult for physicians to provide care without the risk of criminal penalties and loss of license.

The ambiguity and inconsistencies in abortion exceptions have led to calls for better-written laws that provide clear guidance to physicians. However, legal experts have noted that the current state laws restricting abortion often mirror each other, and well-written health exceptions are rare.

Frequently asked questions