King's Trial Defense: Justifying Civil Disobedience

Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from a Birmingham Jail is a defence of the idea that one may morally break an unjust law if they accept the legal punishment for doing so. In the letter, King addresses the charge that his moral legitimacy was undermined because he broke the law to achieve his purpose. He acknowledges the gravity of choosing to break the law, even for a just cause, and agrees that civil disobedience must be exercised with caution and regret. However, he differentiates between just and unjust laws, stating that a just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.

King differentiated between just and unjust laws

Martin Luther King Jr.'s views on the law can be divided into two categories: law as an obstacle and law as an opportunity. In his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail", King tackled the question of how he could justify breaking certain laws while condemning segregationists for their defiance of federal civil rights requirements.

King also acknowledged the existence of laws that are just on their face but unjust in their application. He used the example of his arrest for parading without a permit to illustrate this point. While there is nothing wrong with requiring a permit for a parade in itself, he explained that when such an ordinance is used to preserve segregation and deny citizens their First Amendment right to peaceful assembly and protest, it becomes unjust.

King's views on civil disobedience were shaped by his Christian faith and his commitment to nonviolence. He believed that breaking an unjust law must be done openly and with a willingness to accept the penalty, as this demonstrates respect for the rule of law while also arousing the conscience of the community over the law's injustice.

King believed that unjust laws were an obstacle to racial justice

Martin Luther King Jr.'s views on the law can be divided into two categories: law as an obstacle and law as an opportunity. In his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail", he defended the position that one may morally break an unjust law if they openly accept the legal punishment for doing so.

King differentiated between just and unjust laws, stating that a just law "is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God". Conversely, an unjust law is "a code that is out of harmony with the moral law". He believed that one has a moral responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey unjust laws.

King's views on civil disobedience were shaped by his commitment to nonviolence and his Christian faith. He understood that choosing to break the law, even for a just cause, was a grave matter and that civil disobedience must be exercised with caution and regret. By accepting the punishment for breaking an unjust law, King believed he was expressing the highest respect for the law.

King's stance on unjust laws was informed by his experiences during the Civil Rights Movement. Southern police arrested civil rights protesters, including King, on numerous occasions for violating various criminal code provisions, such as disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, and trespassing. King struggled to explain why he believed civil rights activists were justified in breaking certain laws while also condemning segregationists for their defiance of federal civil rights requirements.

For King, unjust laws—and the courts that enforced them—were significant obstacles in the pursuit of racial justice. He recognized that the law had limitations in addressing entrenched patterns of inequality and that organized social action was necessary to complement legal change.

King's attitude towards laws that advanced racial justice

Martin Luther King Jr.'s views on the law can be divided into two categories: law as an obstacle and law as an opportunity.

Much of the civil rights movement was a struggle against the law—against racially discriminatory laws or racially neutral laws that segregationists used to attack civil rights activism. King was arrested multiple times for violating practically every criminal code provision, from disturbing the peace and marching without a permit to trespassing and engaging in criminal libel and conspiracy.

In his 1963 "Letter from Birmingham Jail", King differentiated between just and unjust laws. He wrote, "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." He believed that one has a moral responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey unjust laws.

On the other hand, King viewed laws that promoted racial justice as opportunities. He understood court decisions and legal reforms as central components of broader political and social struggles. While he valued courtroom decisions and legislation, he emphasized the importance of the difficult work required to give life to basic legal principles. Judicial and legislative breakthroughs, in his view, were calls to action rather than mere moments for celebration.

King's relationship with civil rights lawyers was sometimes tense, and he sought to distance himself from the litigation-based tactics of organizations like the NAACP. He believed that direct-action protest was both an extension of and an alternative to their project of school desegregation litigation, which had largely stalled due to obstructionist legal maneuverings. He critiqued what he saw as their overly idealistic vision of the law and warned against getting "involved in legalism [and] needless fights in lower courts," as it would "draw out the fight."

Instead, King advocated for mass action and civil disobedience to local laws as a form of civil obedience to national laws. He emphasized the importance of organized social action alongside legal change, arguing that legal reform alone was limited in its ability to affect hearts and minds and uproot entrenched patterns of inequality.

King's views on the relationship between the law and social justice

Martin Luther King Jr.'s views on the relationship between the law and social justice are complex and multifaceted. He recognised that laws could be both an obstacle and an opportunity for advancing racial justice.

Law as an Obstacle to Racial Justice

King's civil rights activism was often in direct conflict with the law. He was arrested multiple times for violating various criminal code provisions, including disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, violating picketing or boycott laws, trespassing, criminal libel, and conspiracy. King struggled to explain why he believed civil rights activists were justified in breaking certain laws while also condemning segregationists for their defiance of federal civil rights requirements.

In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail", King differentiated between just and unjust laws. He wrote, "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." He argued that segregation laws were inherently unjust and, therefore, morally wrong. King further distinguished between laws that are just on their face but unjust in their application. For example, he was arrested for parading without a permit, which he acknowledged as a just law in principle, but he argued that it became unjust when used to preserve segregation and deny citizens their First Amendment rights.

Law as an Opportunity for Advancing Racial Justice

King also recognised the potential for laws to advance racial justice. He sought school desegregation orders, non-discrimination requirements for restaurants, hotels, and private employers, and voting rights protections. He understood court decisions and legal reform as essential components of broader political and social struggles. While he valued courtroom decisions and legislation, he emphasised the importance of giving life to basic legal principles through difficult work and organised social action.

King had a complex relationship with civil rights lawyers, acknowledging their critical role while also recognising the limitations of legal reform. He cautioned against getting "involved in legalism [and] needless fights in lower courts", arguing that it could distract from the broader social movement. He believed that legal change must be accompanied by organised social action to effectively address entrenched patterns of inequality and uproot injustice.

In summary, King's views on the relationship between the law and social justice were nuanced. He recognised the law as both an obstacle and an opportunity in the pursuit of racial justice. He advocated for breaking unjust laws while also emphasising the importance of legal reform and the power of organised social action to address injustice.

King's Letter from Birmingham Jail

Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a defence of civil disobedience in the face of unjust laws. King was arrested and jailed in Birmingham, Alabama, for his leadership in a march protesting the city's system of racial segregation. In his letter, he justifies breaking the law in the name of a higher moral duty.

King differentiates between just and unjust laws, writing, "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." He argues that people have a moral responsibility to obey just laws but also to disobey unjust laws. This idea is rooted in Christian theology and philosophy, specifically invoking St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine's teachings.

King acknowledges the gravity of choosing to break the law, even for a just cause, and he expresses that civil disobedience should be exercised with caution and regret. However, he justifies his actions by arguing that segregation laws are inherently unjust and, therefore, morally wrong. He writes, "I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court because it is morally right, and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances because they are morally wrong."

King also addresses the charge that his non-violent actions led to the violence of others. He compares this accusation to condemning a robbery victim for possessing money or blaming Jesus for the violence of the crucifixion because he refused to bow to Caesar. As a Christian theologian, King understood Jesus' words about bringing not peace but a sword to mean that those who follow Jesus will be a disruptive presence in an unjust world.

King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a powerful statement of his commitment to non-violence, justice, and the truth of human solidarity. It is a call to action, challenging readers to consider the moral implications of their legal and political lives, regardless of their background or beliefs.

Frequently asked questions