Alabama Abortion Law: A Step Backwards For Women's Rights

Alabama's abortion law, which came into effect in June 2022, is one of the most restrictive in the US. The law prohibits all abortions unless medically necessary to avoid a serious health risk to the pregnant woman. There are no exceptions for cases involving rape, incest, or human trafficking. Alabama's abortion ban has sparked controversy and raised concerns about reproductive rights and access to safe abortion care, especially for marginalized communities. The state's definition of abortion also excludes ectopic pregnancies and cases where the unborn child has a lethal anomaly. The law imposes penalties on physicians and healthcare workers who perform illegal abortions, classifying it as a felony with potential prison sentences.

The impact on marginalised communities

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as the state's abortion ban, has a disproportionate impact on marginalised communities. The law prohibits abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with the only exemption being if the pregnant person's health is at serious risk. This means that people from marginalised communities, who already face barriers to accessing healthcare, will be further disadvantaged when seeking abortion care.

Low-income individuals, people of colour, young people, and those without insurance are among those who will be most affected by the law. These communities often face structural inequities that make it difficult or impossible to access abortion services, even when their health is at risk. The law also fails to acknowledge that anyone who can become pregnant may need an abortion, including those who do not identify as women.

The lack of exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or human trafficking in Alabama's abortion ban further marginalises those who become pregnant as a result of these traumas. The requirement for a physician's determination of medical necessity to avoid a serious health risk adds an additional burden, as it may be difficult for survivors of sexual assault or incest to find a doctor willing to make this determination.

The impact of Alabama's abortion ban on marginalised communities is compounded by the state's efforts to prevent residents from travelling out of state to obtain abortion services. The state's attorney general, Steve Marshall, has threatened to prosecute those who assist Alabama residents in obtaining abortions outside of the state, creating a climate of fear and uncertainty for those seeking abortion care.

The Justice Department has weighed in on the issue, stating that Alabama cannot interfere with an individual's right to travel, including for abortion care where it is legal. However, the lack of access to safe and legal abortion services in Alabama continues to disproportionately affect marginalised communities, who may not have the resources or support systems to navigate these legal complexities.

The legal status of abortion pills

Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to a period of liberalization following the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide. However, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, and Alabama began enforcing its total abortion ban, prohibiting abortion at all stages of pregnancy.

Medication abortion, which occurs early in pregnancy through a two-pill regimen, is unavailable in Alabama. The state's abortion ban includes a definition of a fetus that includes the scientifically unfounded statement of "a fetus in utero at any stage of development." This means that abortion pills, which are commonly used to induce abortions, are illegal in Alabama.

The Alabama Attorney General, Steve Marshall, has stated that women in Alabama who use abortion pills to end pregnancies could be prosecuted under the state's chemical endangerment law. This law was initially designed to protect children from meth lab fumes, but it has been applied to protect fetuses from chemicals and drugs used by pregnant women. Since then, the law has been used to incarcerate women who have had miscarriages or stillbirths after using drugs, and its enforcement varies widely across the state.

While the Human Life Protection Act, Alabama's abortion ban, exempts women from criminal liability, Marshall has argued that this exemption does not extend to all criminal laws, including the chemical endangerment law. This stance has been criticized by reproductive rights advocates, who argue that it undermines the intent of the Human Life Protection Act and could lead to unlawful prosecutions.

The role of the Justice Department

The U.S. Department of Justice has asserted that Alabama cannot prosecute people and groups who help women leave the state to obtain abortions. This position was filed in consolidated lawsuits against Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, arguing that such prosecutions would be unconstitutional as they violate the U.S. Constitution's protection of the right to travel.

The Justice Department's statement comes in response to Alabama's abortion ban, which prohibits abortion at any stage of pregnancy without exceptions for rape and incest. The only exemption is if the pregnant individual's health is at serious risk. The state's abortion ban has sparked lawsuits from an abortion fund and former providers, seeking clarification that Alabama cannot use conspiracy statutes to prosecute those who assist women in travelling elsewhere for an abortion.

The Justice Department's role in this matter is significant as it upholds the constitutional right to travel for abortion care where it is legal. This stance is in direct opposition to Alabama's Attorney General, who has threatened to prosecute groups providing abortion assistance. The legal dispute highlights the ongoing tension between federal and state abortion laws, with the Justice Department advocating for the protection of individuals' rights to travel for reproductive care.

The outcome of the legal dispute in Alabama will have implications for similar cases in other states. Several Texas counties have also sought to block travel to access abortion services, presenting legal risks to those who assist individuals in obtaining abortions. The Justice Department's intervention underscores its commitment to ensuring individuals' access to reproductive care, regardless of their state's laws.

Alabama's history of abortion restrictions

In the 19th century, state legislature bans on abortion aimed to protect the life of the mother, given the high number of deaths caused by abortions at the time. By the end of 1972, Alabama allowed abortions only when the woman's physical health was endangered.

The landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion nationwide and meant that Alabama could no longer regulate abortion in the first trimester. This led to a period of liberalization in the state.

However, Alabama has consistently sought to restrict access to abortion. In 1974, the state had an illegal abortion mortality rate of 0.1 to 0.9 per million women aged 15–44. In 1990, 456,000 women in Alabama faced the risk of an unintended pregnancy.

In 2014, a survey by the Pew Research Center found that 58% of surveyed adults in Alabama believed abortion should be illegal in most or all cases, while 37% indicated it should be legal. A strong correlation was observed between opposition to abortion and conservative political views.

In 2016, Alabama banned dilation & evacuation (D&E), the most common abortion procedure used in the second trimester. In 2018, the Eleventh Circuit court ruled this legislation to be unconstitutional, blocking its enforcement.

In 2019, Alabama passed the Human Life Protection Act, one of the nation's most restrictive abortion laws. This law sought to ban most abortions at any stage of pregnancy, with no exceptions for rape or incest, only allowing abortions if there was a serious health risk to the mother. The law was blocked by a federal court in 2019 but went into effect in June 2022 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Alabama's abortion regulations also include mandatory waiting periods, parental consent requirements for minors, and stringent guidelines for abortion clinics. The state has also passed additional medically unnecessary codes that must be followed for clinics to operate.

The impact on minors

Minors seeking abortions in Alabama face a number of challenges and restrictions. Firstly, Alabama law requires either the parent or legal guardian of a pregnant minor to provide consent for an abortion, unless the minor seeks a judicial bypass and the judge permits the procedure. This means that minors must involve their parents or legal guardians in their decision to have an abortion, which may not be a safe or viable option for all young people.

In addition, Alabama's abortion ban, which prohibits all abortions unless medically necessary to protect the pregnant person's health, does not include exceptions for minors who become pregnant due to rape, incest, or human trafficking. This means that minors in these situations are faced with the decision to either carry the pregnancy to term or seek an illegal abortion, both of which can have significant physical, emotional, and psychological impacts.

The lack of exceptions in the abortion ban can also result in minors delaying necessary medical care. Alabama law requires a mandatory 48-hour waiting period, biased counseling, and an ultrasound before an abortion can be performed. This waiting period may cause minors to seek alternative, unsafe methods to terminate their pregnancies, potentially putting their health and lives at risk.

Furthermore, the criminalization of abortion in Alabama has led to the closure of abortion clinics in the state, limiting minors' access to safe and legal abortion services. While nonprofit organizations like the Yellowhammer Fund continue to provide assistance and information to minors and women seeking abortions, the threat of prosecution and the lack of local clinics create significant barriers for minors.

The impact of Alabama's abortion law on minors is far-reaching and complex. It not only affects their physical health but also their emotional well-being, privacy, and ability to make decisions about their own bodies. The law's restrictions and requirements can create additional stress and trauma for minors, who may already be facing challenging circumstances.

Frequently asked questions