Kentucky's Abortion Laws: Outlawing Women's Rights

Abortion laws vary across the United States, with Kentucky being one of the states with the most restrictive abortion laws. Abortion is currently illegal in Kentucky, with a history of laws surrounding abortion dating back to 1900. In this essay, I will explore the history of abortion laws in Kentucky, the current legal status of abortion in the state, and the impact of these laws on its residents.

Kentucky's trigger law, HB 148

The trigger law was passed in 2019 by the Republican-controlled General Assembly and signed by then-Governor Matt Bevin. Kentucky is one of about a dozen states with similar trigger laws in place following the U.S. Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade. The law went into effect after the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

The number of abortion clinics in Kentucky has declined over time, with eleven abortion clinics in 1982, nine in 1992, two in 2002, and one in 2017. In 2019, prior to the trigger law, Kentucky law prohibited abortions after week 22. This changed when the state legislature passed a law moving the prohibition to week 6. A bill passed in April 2022 further lowered the threshold to 15 weeks, introducing regulations that made abortion illegal until blocked by a federal court.

The state's only two abortion providers, both in Louisville, had suspended abortion services in April 2022 due to new restrictions and reporting requirements imposed by the legislature. Abortion services resumed temporarily after a federal judge blocked key parts of the law, including the provision banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. However, with the trigger law now in place, abortion services in Kentucky have ceased once again.

Reproductive rights activists argue that the lack of access to abortion will disproportionately impact marginalized populations in the state, including people living at or near the poverty line and Black and Brown Kentuckians. The ACLU of Kentucky and Planned Parenthood are working to help Kentuckians access abortion services out of state and are committed to continuing the fight for reproductive freedom in the state.

Kentucky Supreme Court's ruling on abortion providers' standing

The Kentucky Supreme Court's ruling on abortion providers' standing has been a significant development in the state's abortion debate. The Court's decision, issued on February 16, 2023, determined that abortion providers could not legally challenge the state's abortion ban on behalf of their patients. This ruling was based on the concept of "third-party standing," where the Court held that the providers lacked the legal standing to assert the constitutional rights of their patients.

The case, EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C., et al. v. Daniel Cameron, et. al., was brought forward by abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood and the EMW Women's Surgical Center, who argued that the abortion bans violated their patients' rights to privacy, bodily autonomy, and self-determination under the Kentucky Constitution. However, the Kentucky Supreme Court's decision focused on narrow legal issues and did not address the larger constitutional questions surrounding abortion access in the state.

The Court's ruling stated that the providers did not have the legal standing to challenge the abortion bans and that the constitutionality of these bans could only be challenged by patients directly. This opinion highlighted the separation of powers and emphasized that the Court would only act when permitted by the constitution. While the Court acknowledged the polarizing nature of the abortion issue, it maintained that its role was limited to interpreting and applying the law, leaving any policy changes to the legislative process.

The Kentucky Supreme Court's decision to uphold the abortion ban has had significant implications for abortion access in the state. With abortion providers prohibited from offering abortions, individuals seeking abortions in Kentucky have faced challenges and barriers in obtaining reproductive healthcare. The Court's refusal to reinstate a lower court's injunction against the abortion bans further underscores the Court's stance on the issue.

The ruling has sparked strong reactions from both supporters and opponents of abortion rights in Kentucky. Abortion-rights advocates have expressed disappointment and concern, vowing to continue the fight to restore abortion access in the state. On the other hand, anti-abortion groups have celebrated the decision as a victory, with the state's Attorney General, Daniel Cameron, pledging to steadfastly defend Kentucky's anti-abortion laws. The legal battle over abortion rights in Kentucky is ongoing, with abortion-rights groups shifting their strategy to focus on future challenges brought by pregnant women denied abortion services.

The impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). The Court held that the U.S. Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, effectively returning the power to regulate abortion to federal and state legislatures. This decision had an immediate and profound impact on abortion laws and access across the country, including in Kentucky.

In Kentucky, the trigger law HB 148 went into effect after the ruling, prohibiting abortion except when necessary to prevent the possible death of or serious risk of permanent injury to the pregnant woman. While a temporary restraining order was issued by a Jefferson County Circuit Judge on June 30, 2022, blocking enforcement of the state's abortion ban, this order was short-lived. On August 1, 2022, Kentucky's trigger law banning abortions was reinstated, and abortion remains banned in the state as of February 2023.

The global impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization cannot be overlooked. While the decision was specific to the United States, it has had reverberations in international spaces and emboldened abortion opponents in many regions. However, it has also spurred solidarity and renewed action by abortion rights activists and policymakers worldwide, particularly in Latin America, Asia, Europe, and Africa, where there has been a general trend towards liberalization of abortion laws.

The decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has had a profound and complex impact, affecting not just abortion laws but also broader discussions about reproductive rights, federalism, and the role of the Supreme Court in shaping society. The effects of this decision continue to unfold, and it remains to be seen how abortion access and related issues will evolve in the United States and globally.

The role of the ACLU in challenging Kentucky's abortion laws

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been challenging Kentucky's abortion laws for decades. In 1987, the ACLU challenged a law that prevented public hospitals from performing abortion procedures, except to protect the life of the mother. The law was later ruled unconstitutional by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The ACLU has also been active in opposing Kentucky's trigger law, HB 148, which went into effect after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling overturned Roe v. Wade. This law prohibits abortion except as necessary to prevent the possible death or permanent injury of the pregnant woman. The ACLU, along with Planned Parenthood Federation of America, filed a lawsuit challenging this law, arguing that it violates the state's constitutional rights to privacy, bodily autonomy, and self-determination. However, the Kentucky Supreme Court denied their request to block the abortion bans, and abortion remains banned in the state as of February 2023.

In December 2023, the ACLU filed a class-action lawsuit, Jane Doe, et al. v. Daniel Cameron, et al., challenging Kentucky's abortion ban on behalf of a pregnant woman, Jane Doe, and a class of all pregnant Kentuckians seeking abortions. The plaintiffs argued that the government's denial of access to abortion care violated their constitutional rights to privacy and self-determination.

The ACLU has expressed disappointment in the Kentucky Supreme Court's failure to protect the health and safety of its citizens and remains committed to helping Kentuckians access the care they need, including helping patients find care out of state.

Kentucky's history of abortion laws and restrictions

Kentucky has a long history of abortion laws and restrictions, with legislation on the topic dating back to at least 1900. These early laws included therapeutic exceptions, which allowed abortions to protect the life of the mother.

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling meant that Kentucky could no longer regulate abortion in the first trimester. However, this didn't stop the state from attempting to restrict abortion access. In 1974, Kentucky adopted a law preventing public hospitals from performing abortions except to protect the life of the mother. This law was later ruled unconstitutional, but the state legislature passed a new version of it in 1980.

The issue of abortion came before the Kentucky Supreme Court in 1983, following the 1981 unlawful abortion conviction of a man from Wayne County. The court ruled that a seven-month-old fetus could not be defined as a person under the Model Penal Code. This ruling led to the introduction of a fetal homicide bill in the 1986 General Assembly, which passed the House but was not considered in the Senate.

During the 1980s and 1990s, the Kentucky General Assembly introduced several bills aimed at restricting abortion access. These included requirements for parental consent, mandatory waiting periods, and informed consent provisions. In 1998, the state passed legislation requiring clinics to have an abortion license to operate.

In the 2010s, the Kentucky General Assembly made multiple attempts to pass early abortion ban bills and so-called "heartbeat bills," which would have prohibited abortions after the detection of fetal cardiac activity. These attempts were ultimately unsuccessful, but the state did pass a law in 2019 moving the prohibition on abortions from week 22 to week 6.

In 2022, Kentucky passed House Bill 3, which banned all abortions after 15 weeks post-conception and introduced a number of regulations and restrictions. This effectively made abortion illegal in the state, as the infrastructure was not in place for the new requirements. The law was blocked in federal court later that year.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022, Kentucky's trigger law went into effect, prohibiting abortion except in cases where it is necessary to prevent the possible death or permanent injury to the pregnant woman. The state's two elective abortion providers were temporarily allowed to resume operations in June 2022, but Kentucky's abortion ban was reinstated on August 1, 2022.

Frequently asked questions