
An intentional tort is a wrongful act that someone plans and carries out while fully aware of their actions. It is a civil wrong that results from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor (alleged wrongdoer). Intentional torts are a central area of civil law and deal with the basic problem of harm in society. The law distinguishes between intentional and unintentional torts due to public policy considerations. The law generally imposes more severe punishments in cases of intentional torts because the harm is more directly related to someone's actions than in cases of negligence.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Definition | A wrongful act that someone plans and carries out while fully aware of their actions |
| Tortfeasor's Intent | The wrongdoer does not need to mean harm, but they must intend to commit the act |
| Tortfeasor's Mental State | The mental state of the person who caused harm is "knowingly" or "purposefully" |
| Tortfeasor's Actions | The wrongdoer must deliberately intend the action that leads to harm or loss |
| Tortfeasor's Liability | The wrongdoer is liable for damages and must pay out of pocket |
| Tort Classification | Civil wrongs, often with factual similarities to criminal law cases |
| Tort Types | Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Land, Trespass to Chattels, Defamation, Conversion, etc. |
| Tort Overlap | Intentional torts may overlap with criminal conduct or with other intentional torts |
| Tort Defences | Truth is a defence to defamation claims, and opinions aren't defamatory |
| Tort Damages | Plaintiffs can recover economic and non-economic damages, and punitive damages may be awarded |
Explore related products
$206.99 $359
What You'll Learn

Intentional torts are a central area of civil law
The law differentiates between intentional and unintentional torts due to public policy considerations. The primary goal of the law is to deter socially harmful behaviour. In cases of intentional torts, the punishment is usually more severe as the harm is more directly related to the actions of the individual. For example, in cases of intentional torts, the defendant may be ordered to pay punitive damages to the plaintiff, in addition to compensatory damages. The intent to cause an intentional tort does not require an intent to harm, but rather the intent to commit the act.
Common intentional torts include battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For instance, in the case of Garratt v. Dailey, a young boy who intentionally pulled a chair out from under an elderly woman, causing her to fall and injure herself, was held liable for the intentional tort of battery, despite not intending to harm her. Other examples of intentional torts include defamation, which involves false statements that harm another person's character or reputation, and conversion, which is the civil version of theft.
The elements of an intentional tort may overlap with the elements of a crime for the same conduct. A defendant found not guilty by a jury in a criminal case may still be held liable for damages in a separate civil case. Intentional torts are generally uninsurable, meaning that tortfeasors must pay damages out of their own pocket.
Law Interns: Making a Difference in the Legal Field
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Intentional torts are wrongful acts done on purpose
Intentional torts are a central area of civil law, and they deal with the basic problem of harm in society. An intentional tort is a wrongful act that someone plans and carries out while fully aware of their actions. The wrongdoer (tortfeasor) does not need to mean harm, but someone else may end up hurt anyway. For example, in cases of domestic violence, the person intends to harm. Both types of cases are examples of intentional torts.
In common law, the three main types of torts are intentional torts, negligent torts, and strict liability torts. Intentional torts occur when the wrongdoer intends to act, and their act becomes an intentional tort. Negligent torts, on the other hand, are caused by someone's negligence or carelessness, without acting with ill purpose. Strict liability torts refer to situations where a party is liable for injuries regardless of the precautions taken.
Common intentional torts include battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For instance, in the case of Garratt v. Dailey, a young boy who intentionally pulled a chair out from under an elderly woman, causing her to fall and injure herself, was liable for the intentional tort of battery, even though he did not intend to harm her.
Defamation, which includes libel and slander, is also an intentional tort. Libel involves a false written statement, while slander involves spoken words. Conversion, or the civil version of theft, is another example of an intentional tort. This includes borrowing an item and refusing to return it on time, as agreed.
In terms of damages, intentional torts tend to result in broader and more generous damages than negligent torts. This is because society generally wishes to deter its members from intentionally attacking each other. Punitive damages, which are meant to punish the wrongdoer and deter others, are more common in cases of intentional torts.
When Snell's Law Fails: Understanding Refraction Angles
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Intentional torts are uninsurable, so tortfeasors must pay damages out of pocket
Intentional torts are wrongful acts that are carried out with purpose and full awareness of one's actions. The wrongdoer, or tortfeasor, may not intend to cause harm, but someone may still be hurt as a result. For example, in a prank, the wrongdoer does not intend to cause harm, but someone may end up getting hurt. On the other hand, in domestic violence situations, the wrongdoer intends to harm the victim. Both types of cases are examples of intentional torts.
Common intentional torts include battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For instance, in the case of Garratt v. Dailey, a young boy who intentionally pulled a chair out from under an elderly woman, causing her to fall and injure herself, was liable for the intentional tort of battery, even though he did not intend to harm her.
Since intentional torts are carried out with purpose, plaintiffs may demonstrate that the defendant acted egregiously and with knowledge of potential harm. In such cases, additional punitive damages may be awarded to set an example and deter future harmful conduct. Punitive damages are intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from engaging in similar behaviour.
As a matter of public policy, damages for intentional torts tend to be more extensive and generous than for negligent torts. This is because society generally wishes to deter its members from intentionally harming one another. For instance, in the United States, it is easier to obtain punitive damages if one can prove that the tort was intentional. However, it is important to note that intentional torts are generally uninsurable, so tortfeasors must pay damages out of pocket.
Demand Generation Strategies: Law Firms' Guide to Success
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Intentional torts are contrasted with negligent torts
Intentional torts are wrongful acts committed by an individual with the purpose of causing harm to another person. The wrongdoer, or tortfeasor, may not mean to cause harm, but the act is still considered intentional. For instance, in a prank, the wrongdoer may not intend to cause harm, but the victim may still end up hurt.
On the other hand, negligent torts, or unintentional torts, are caused by someone's negligence or carelessness. The wrongdoer does not act with ill purpose but is still held legally responsible because their actions caused harm to someone. For example, during an argument, a neighbour might smash a cup on the floor, causing glass shards to fly up and lodge in your eye. This act was not intentional but negligent.
The key difference between intentional and negligent torts is the actor's state of mind. Intentional torts require the element of intent, whereas negligent torts do not. In other words, intentional torts are committed when the wrongdoer plans and carries out an act while fully aware of their actions. Negligent torts, on the other hand, occur when an individual fails to meet a reasonable standard of care for the safety of those around them.
Some common intentional torts include assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass, defamation, and invasion of privacy. Assault refers to threatening injury or attempting battery, while battery involves harmful or offensive contact with another person. False imprisonment is the unlawful restraint of a person, and trespass involves using someone's property without permission. Defamation includes slander (spoken falsehoods) and libel (written falsehoods), while invasion of privacy involves the unwanted production of negative public information.
Police Accountability: Misquoting Laws and Their Consequences
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Intentional torts can overlap with elements of a crime
Intentional torts are wrongful acts that are carried out with full awareness of one's actions. Many of these acts can also be charged as crimes, leading to similarities between civil and criminal law cases. For instance, in a murder case, the family of the victim can sue the perpetrator for wrongful death in civil court, regardless of the outcome of the criminal conviction.
Battery is a common example of an intentional tort, which involves harmful or offensive physical contact with another person. This can include touching someone inappropriately, such as in cases of sexual battery, or even sending projectiles into someone's body, like firing a gun. Battery is also a criminal charge for a similar act, often accompanied by an assault charge. Assault and battery frequently occur together, but they can be distinct. For instance, if Bob pulls a gun on Mike, it is an assault, but if he shoots Mike in the back, it becomes a battery.
Defamation is another example of an intentional tort, which involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. If the statement is spoken, it is called slander, and if it is written, it is called libel. Defamation is an intentional tort if the statement is made about a public figure, such as a politician or celebrity.
Fraud is another example of an intentional tort, which involves lying to someone with the intent to deceive them. This can also be charged as a crime outside of civil torts. Conversion is also considered an intentional tort, which is the civil equivalent of theft. For instance, borrowing an item and refusing to return it as agreed can make one liable for conversion.
In summary, intentional torts can overlap with elements of a crime, and the same conduct can be prosecuted as a crime and simultaneously pursued as a civil lawsuit. The distinction lies in the burden of proof, as criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while civil cases often demand a preponderance of evidence or clear and convincing evidence.
How Laws are Made in New Zealand
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
An intentional tort is a wrongful act that someone plans and carries out while fully aware of their actions.
Common law is a body of law that has evolved through court precedent. On the other hand, written law refers to laws that are enacted by a legislative body and are usually found in statutes or codes.
Common intentional torts include battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Intentional torts are committed when the wrongdoer means to do an act or cause harm. Unintentional torts, also known as negligent torts, are caused by someone's negligence or carelessness without any ill purpose.
The law generally imposes more severe punishments in cases of intentional torts, including punitive damages, to deter socially harmful behavior. Plaintiffs can recover economic and non-economic damages, and defendants may have to pay out of pocket as intentional torts are typically uninsurable.
![Tort Law: Responsibilities and Redress [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71YmOIIHT+L._AC_UY218_.jpg)

![Tort Law: Principles in Practice: Principles in Practice [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook Series)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61orfeQ19yL._AC_UY218_.jpg)

![Torts: Cases and Questions [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61C6UYhPf-L._AC_UY218_.jpg)


![Basic Tort Law: Cases, Statutes, and Problems: Cases, Statutes, and Problems [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook Series)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/611ayo4AJNL._AC_UY218_.jpg)



![Personal Injury and the Law of Torts for Paralegals: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Paralegal)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71rUE-AxpCL._AC_UY218_.jpg)

























