Abortion Legality: Understanding The Complexities Of The Law

Abortion is a highly contentious issue, with laws varying significantly by jurisdiction. In some countries and US states, abortion is illegal in all circumstances, while others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, and some allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which had protected abortion as a constitutional right for 49 years. This decision has resulted in a patchwork of abortion laws across the US, with 14 states making abortion illegal. However, abortion remains legal in some US states, and in many other countries worldwide. The legality of abortion is a complex issue, with a range of factors influencing the laws and policies surrounding it. While some countries have liberal abortion laws, others have restrictive laws or a complete ban on the procedure. The debate around abortion often centres on the question of whether it is a fundamental human right or a violation of the rights of the unborn child.

The legality of abortion in the United States

However, abortion remains legal in many states, and it is not banned nationwide. The legality of abortion is determined by state laws, territory laws, and the District of Columbia, which means that abortion policies and reproductive rights are now in the hands of each state.

Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with few exceptions, while others permit it up to a certain point. Some states allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

The abortion debate is a divisive issue in American politics and culture, although a majority of Americans support access to abortion. The abortion-rights movement advocates for patient choice and bodily autonomy, while the anti-abortion movement maintains that the fetus has a right to live.

Abortion laws vary widely across the United States, and the legal status of abortion differs considerably from state to state. As of 2024, Alaska, California, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Ohio, and Vermont have a right to abortion in their state constitutions, either explicitly or as interpreted by the state supreme court. Other states, such as Colorado and Massachusetts, protect abortion under state law. The state constitutions of Alabama, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia explicitly contain no right to an abortion.

The impact of Roe v. Wade

The Roe v. Wade ruling of 1973 was a landmark decision that recognised a woman's constitutional right to privacy and, by extension, her right to choose to have an abortion. This ruling set a precedent that prevented states from banning abortions and ensured that women across the United States had access to safe and legal abortions.

However, the impact of this ruling went beyond just the legalisation of abortion. Roe v. Wade also had significant implications for women's health, particularly for those from marginalised communities. By guaranteeing access to abortion, the ruling helped to reduce the number of unsafe abortions performed and, as a result, lowered the rate of pregnancy-related complications and maternal deaths. This was especially important for women of colour, who have historically faced systemic barriers to accessing healthcare.

In addition, Roe v. Wade had a broader impact on society's views towards women and their role in society. The ruling recognised that women should have control over their own bodies and reproductive choices, which was a significant step towards achieving gender equality. It also empowered women to make decisions about their lives and futures, including their education, careers, and family planning.

Furthermore, the ruling had a ripple effect on other areas of law and policy. It helped to shape the legal understanding of privacy and the extent to which the state could interfere in individuals' personal decisions. The recognition of a right to privacy had implications for a range of other issues, including birth control, same-sex relationships, and end-of-life decisions.

However, the impact of Roe v. Wade was not universally positive. Some critics argued that the ruling led to a more permissive society and a decline in moral values. They claimed that it contributed to a culture that devalued human life and promoted individualism over community. These critics also argued that the ruling undermined the traditional family structure and the role of religion in society.

Nonetheless, the overall impact of Roe v. Wade was significant and far-reaching. It not only changed the legal landscape but also shaped societal attitudes and influenced other areas of law and policy. The ruling had a particularly profound effect on women's lives, giving them greater control over their bodies and reproductive choices.

The right to bodily autonomy

Bodily autonomy asserts that a person has the right to decide what happens to their body and that they should not be forced to continue an unwanted pregnancy. This right to self-determination over one's body and reproductive choices is often cited as a key reason why abortion should be legal and accessible. It is argued that criminalising or restricting abortion infringes on this fundamental human right and undermines an individual's ability to fully exercise their reproductive autonomy.

The concept of bodily autonomy in the context of abortion was first fully articulated by moral philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1971. She compared a pregnant woman to someone who, without their consent, is hooked up to a famous violinist who needs this connection to survive. Thomson argued that just as it would be morally acceptable to detach oneself from the violinist, resulting in their death, so too would it be acceptable for a woman to terminate her pregnancy. This analogy highlights the idea that pregnancy without consent can be seen as a violation of bodily integrity and autonomy.

However, critics of using bodily autonomy as a justification for abortion argue that it fails to acknowledge the moral relationship between mother and child, which already exists by the time abortion is contemplated. They assert that abortion entails intentional killing and that the intention is not just to detach but to ensure the child no longer exists. Additionally, they claim that the violinist analogy only applies when pregnancy is a result of a violation of bodily integrity, such as in cases of rape, and not when it arises from consensual sex.

The legal status of abortion varies across different countries and states. While some places have legalised abortion, recognising the right to bodily autonomy, others have criminalised it or imposed restrictions. For example, in the United States, the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 guaranteed the right to safe and legal abortion, but this was recently overturned, allowing states to impose their own regulations. As a result, abortion laws differ significantly across the country, with some states prohibiting abortion entirely, while others permit it with varying restrictions and time limits.

The debate around bodily autonomy and abortion remains a complex and contentious issue, with passionate arguments on both sides. Those advocating for abortion rights emphasise the importance of individual liberty and self-determination, while opponents argue for the protection of unborn life and the fulfilment of parental obligations.

The criminalisation of abortion

In some countries, there are laws that only allow abortion under specific circumstances, such as when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, if there is a severe and fatal injury to the foetus, or if the pregnancy presents a threat to the life or health of the pregnant person. However, only a small portion of abortions are due to these reasons, meaning these narrow exceptions still prevent most people from fully exercising their reproductive rights.

Unsafe abortions are the third leading cause of preventable maternal deaths worldwide and are also the cause of five million largely preventable disabilities, according to the World Health Organization.

The decriminalisation of abortion means removing specific criminal sanctions against abortion from the law and changing the law and related policies and regulations to achieve the following:

• Not punishing anyone for providing a safe abortion
• Not punishing anyone for having an abortion
• Not involving the police in investigating or prosecuting safe abortion provision or practice
• Not involving the courts in deciding whether to allow an abortion
• Treating abortion like every other form of health care

The decriminalisation of abortion

In the United States, for example, abortion laws vary by state, with some states prohibiting abortion entirely, while others permit it up to a certain point in the pregnancy. Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, states now have broader discretion to prohibit or regulate abortion. Some states, like Alabama, have imposed strict laws, making performing an abortion a Class A felony with up to 99 years in prison. On the other hand, states like Alaska and California allow abortions up to the point of fetal viability and have fewer restrictions.

The United Kingdom, specifically England, Scotland, and Wales, generally allow abortions up to 24 weeks but require hospitalisation after 10 weeks. However, the abortion law in these countries has been criticised as "shocking" and "archaic", leading to calls for decriminalisation and reform. The current law gives doctors control over a woman's body, requiring the approval of two doctors for an abortion, which can delay the procedure and limit a woman's choices.

Decriminalisation of abortion would remove the criminal penalties associated with the procedure, treating it as a healthcare issue rather than a legal one. This shift would ensure that women are not criminalised for making decisions about their bodies and would provide safer access to abortions. Additionally, decriminalisation could reduce the social stigma surrounding abortion, making it easier for individuals to access the procedure without fear of judgment or prosecution.

While there are differing opinions on the topic, the ultimate goal is to ensure that individuals have access to safe and legal abortions, protecting their reproductive rights and bodily autonomy.

Frequently asked questions