Law's Uncertain Future: Breaking Down?

Is the law breaking down? This question has been asked in the wake of recent events involving the second Trump Administration and the world's richest man, Elon Musk. In the first few weeks of his second term, Trump has wasted no time in testing the boundaries of executive authority, with some legal experts seeing a constitutional crisis unfolding. Trump's actions, including attempting to dismantle independent agencies, granting private individuals access to sensitive government systems, and offering federal employee buyouts, are triggering legal challenges and debates over presidential power.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk's actions have also raised concerns about potential illegalities. Musk's aides took over the US Agency for International Development (USAID), froze most foreign aid, accessed confidential data, and shut down its website. These actions, along with Trump's, have led to questions about a breakdown in the rule of law and the role of the courts, Congress, and public opinion in holding those in power accountable.

Corruption

The Council of Europe has developed strong anti-corruption legal standards and tasked the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) with overseeing their implementation. The United Nations Convention against Corruption, signed by 140 countries, is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. Investigative journalists and whistleblowers play a pivotal role in exposing corruption, but they often face risks and danger for their efforts.

To combat corruption, preventive measures, criminalization, law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange are necessary. Additionally, ensuring transparency and access to information are crucial tools in the fight against corruption, demonstrating that public interest remains at the core of decision-making.

Inadequate enforcement

Firstly, individuals may decide not to follow the law due to personal gain, disagreement with the law, or a belief that their actions are justified. This is often influenced by human emotions, behaviours, and the tension between individual goals and the goals of the group. For example, an individual may steal despite the existence of laws against theft, as they prioritise their own benefit over societal rules.

Secondly, the interpretation of laws and their enforcement can be inconsistent and subject to corruption. Judges, lawyers, and politicians, who are responsible for interpreting and enforcing the law, may be corrupt or abuse their power. This can result in the subversion of the rule of law, as seen in the case of Adolf Hitler, who used legal means to gain power and subsequently undermined the legal system.

Additionally, the complexity and variation of laws across different jurisdictions can make it challenging for individuals to stay informed and compliant. Laws can differ significantly between states, cities, and even neighbourhoods, making it easy for individuals to unknowingly break the law. For instance, jaywalking, sharing streaming service passwords, and recording conversations without consent are examples of actions that may be illegal in certain areas but not others.

Furthermore, inadequate enforcement can be a result of limited resources or capacity within law enforcement agencies. This can lead to a lack of effective monitoring, investigation, and punishment for lawbreakers.

Finally, societal influences, such as widespread unrest, two-tier justice, and charismatic leaders, can also contribute to inadequate enforcement. When a significant portion of society disagrees with or actively works against the law, it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain rule of law.

In summary, inadequate enforcement of the law is a complex issue influenced by individual motivations, societal factors, and the challenges of interpreting and implementing complex legal systems. Addressing these issues requires a combination of effective law enforcement, independent oversight, and a society that largely supports and abides by the rule of law.

Human behaviour

Habits are a key factor in human behaviour. We adapt to our finite cognitive capacity by forming habits, which enable us to deal with familiar situations without expending too much of our precious cognitive capacity. We can think about other, more important things, while still living our day-to-day lives. Habits form the strongest basis for predicting behaviour. Over time, we learn to behave in a particular way when we encounter a set of familiar circumstances.

Personality also plays a role in determining our behaviour. Some people will follow the rules to the letter, while others will only follow those they consider legitimate. A very small proportion of people will not abide by any rule that prevents them from achieving their goals.

To change existing habits, the moral justification for rules can be emphasised, and attention can be drawn to elements of the environment that might otherwise have been ignored. This can provide the basis for new, safer habits.

Inconsistent interpretation

The interpretation of laws is inconsistent, and this inconsistency can lead to their breakdown. Laws are subject to interpretation by judges, and while ethical standards and disbarment procedures exist to prevent corruption, judges are not infallible.

The interpretation of laws can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction, and even within a single country, state, or city. For example, recording conversations without consent is illegal in some US states, but only if the conversation is recorded without the consent of all parties involved. In other states, only one party's consent is required. This inconsistency can lead to confusion and accidental law-breaking.

In addition, the interpretation of laws can change over time, and sometimes the laws themselves become outdated or are so harsh that the people governed by them rise up in revolution, as seen in the American and French Revolutions.

Furthermore, the interpretation of laws is not static and can be influenced by human emotions and behaviour. Human laws are fragile because they are created by humans, who can also choose not to follow them. This is in contrast to natural laws, which are outside human control and cannot be broken.

The inconsistent interpretation of laws can lead to their breakdown as people may disagree with the law or find ways to circumvent it. This can result in a power struggle between individuals and society or between different societies. Ultimately, the breakdown of laws can have far-reaching consequences for communities and countries.

Lack of public support

Public support for the law is essential for maintaining the rule of law and social order. However, a lack of public support can lead to the breakdown of law and order in several ways:

• Corruption and Abuse of Power: When there is a lack of public support for the law, it creates opportunities for corruption and abuse of power by those in positions of authority. Judges, politicians, and law enforcement officers may act in their self-interest, rather than upholding the rule of law. This can include accepting bribes, abusing power, or passing laws that serve their interests at the expense of the public good.
• Social and Political Unrest: A lack of public support for the law can lead to social and political unrest, as people lose faith in the legitimacy and effectiveness of the legal system. This unrest can manifest in various forms, such as protests, riots, or even insurrection, as seen in the 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol.
• Ineffective Law Enforcement: Law enforcement relies on public cooperation and support to be effective. When there is a lack of public support, people may be less likely to report crimes, cooperate with investigations, or comply with legal procedures. This can hinder the ability of law enforcement agencies to maintain order and bring criminals to justice.
• Perpetuation of Injustice: When the law loses public support, it becomes difficult to address systemic injustices and inequalities. This can lead to a breakdown of trust between marginalized communities and the legal system, further exacerbating social tensions and undermining the rule of law.
• Rise of Alternative Systems: In the absence of public support for the formal legal system, alternative systems of justice may emerge. These can include informal community-based justice, vigilante groups, or even the influence of criminal organizations that establish their own rules and exert control through fear and violence.
• Erosion of Social Contract: The social contract, which is the implicit agreement between citizens and the state, relies on a mutual understanding and respect for the rule of law. A lack of public support for the law can lead to a breakdown of this social contract, as citizens lose faith in the state's ability or willingness to protect their rights and ensure their well-being.

It is important to recognize that public support for the law is dynamic and can fluctuate over time. It is influenced by various factors, including the perceived effectiveness of the legal system, the responsiveness of lawmakers to the needs and concerns of the public, and the existence of mechanisms for citizens to hold those in power accountable.

Frequently asked questions