
Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system, a legacy of its history as a British colony. Judicial precedent, or the decisions from higher courts in previous cases on the same issue, must be followed by the court when deciding a case. Singapore's law on contracts, torts, restitution, administrative law, equity and trust law, property law, and criminal law has been created through this common law tradition. Singapore has a well-regarded judicial system, known for its fairness, integrity, and efficiency, and is considered one of the best countries globally for starting and running a business. Singapore has also complemented its courts with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, including mediation and arbitration, which offer a cheaper, quicker, and easier way to settle legal issues compared to litigation.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Legal System | Common law system |
| History | British colony |
| Judiciary | Two-tier system with State Courts as the first tier |
| Judicial Precedent | Decisions from higher courts on previous cases must be followed |
| Law Sources | Habits and agreements in society, and legislation from other jurisdictions |
| Law Areas | Administrative, contract, equity and trust, property, tort, criminal, company, and family law |
| Law Application | Decisions based on logic rather than provenance |
| Alternative Dispute Resolution | Mediation and arbitration |
| Arbitration Bodies | Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and Singapore Mediation Centre (SMC) |
| Country Rankings | Top in Asia for intellectual property protection, least corrupt in Asia, and most popular Asian jurisdiction for arbitration |
| Associations | Founding member of ASEAN |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Singapore's legal system is based on English common law
Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system. As a former British colony, Singapore's legal system has been influenced by English common law, which forms the basis of its judicial decisions. In a common-law system, judicial precedent or the decisions of higher courts in previous cases on similar issues are followed by lower courts when deciding a case. This is evident in Singapore's law on contracts, torts, and restitution, which has been created through this common-law tradition.
While Singapore's laws were originally based on English judicial precedent, the country has since developed its own unique jurisprudence. Singaporean judges may refer to English case law when dealing with issues pertaining to traditional common-law areas or interpreting Singaporean statutes based on English enactments. However, they are increasingly independent and consider decisions from other Commonwealth jurisdictions, such as Australia and Canada, choosing to base their rulings on logic rather than provenance. Additionally, certain Singapore statutes are influenced by legislation from other jurisdictions, such as India, when it comes to interpreting acts like the Evidence Act and the Penal Code.
Singapore's legal system is known for its fairness, integrity, and efficiency, making it a favourable place for businesses. The country has a well-developed judicial system divided into two tiers. The first tier consists of various State Courts that hear lower-value cases directly from the people and resolve their disputes. Singapore has also implemented alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, such as mediation and arbitration, which offer cheaper and quicker alternatives to court litigation.
Singapore's legal system has some unique features, such as the abolition of jury trials, which is uncommon in common-law countries. The country's legal culture is influenced by its export-oriented industry, and its industrial relations system is known for its stability and collaboration between the government, workers, and employers. Singapore's laws are also shaped by its multiethnic and multicultural population, contributing to its unique legal landscape.
Self-Defense Laws in Canada: What You Need to Know
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Singapore's judiciary is efficient and effective
Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system, owing to its history as a British colony. Major areas of law, such as administrative law, contract law, equity and trust law, property law, and tort law, are largely judge-made, while others, such as criminal law, company law, and family law, are primarily statutory. Singapore's judiciary, an independent branch of the government, enforces and interprets these laws without influence from other branches, ensuring fairness, integrity, and efficiency.
The judiciary's effectiveness and efficiency have been key to Singapore's success as a leading financial and business centre. The country's regulatory environment has been ranked as the most business-friendly in the world by the World Bank Group, and Singapore is also recognised for having the best protection of intellectual property in Asia. The efficiency of the judiciary is further demonstrated by its use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, such as mediation and arbitration, which provide cheaper, quicker, and easier ways to settle legal issues outside of the traditional court system.
Singapore's judiciary has also been proactive in addressing the challenges posed by rapid regulatory changes and technological advancements. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon has emphasised the importance of continuing judicial education and training through the Singapore Judicial College, encouraging judges to become lifelong learners who can adapt to new legal and technical areas. This ensures that the judiciary remains effective and efficient, providing clear and certain answers to commercial actors, even as the pace of change accelerates.
The efficiency of Singapore's judiciary is further enhanced by its commitment to upholding the rule of law. The judiciary ensures that all individuals have equal access to justice and are treated according to established rules and principles. This foundation of the rule of law provides stability and predictability for commercial transactions, fostering economic growth and development.
In conclusion, Singapore's judiciary is effective and efficient due to its independence, commitment to fairness and integrity, utilisation of ADR options, proactive approach to judicial education, and strong adherence to the rule of law. These factors have contributed to Singapore's reputation as a leading financial and business hub with a world-renowned regulatory environment.
Law Firms: Social Media Strategies for Success
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Singapore has abolished jury trials
Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system. Major areas of law, such as administrative law, contract law, equity and trust law, property law, and tort law, are largely judge-made, while other areas, such as criminal law, company law, and family law, are primarily statutory in nature. Singapore's legal system has evolved to become increasingly independent from English law, developing a unique Singaporean jurisprudence that incorporates best legal practices from around the world.
Singapore's judiciary is known for its fairness, integrity, and efficiency, making the country a popular jurisdiction for arbitration and dispute resolution. Singapore's judicial system is structured into two tiers. The first tier consists of various State Courts that handle lower-value cases directly from citizens and resolve their disputes. The second tier comprises the Supreme Court, which includes the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Jury trials in Singapore were abolished in 1969, the same year the country re-established its Supreme Court following independence from Malaysia. The abolition of jury trials was enacted through an amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code, which stipulated that trials for capital offenses would be heard by two judges. This arrangement lasted until 1992, when the Criminal Procedure Code was amended again to allow for trials of capital offenses to be heard by a single judge.
The decision to abolish jury trials in Singapore may have been influenced by concerns regarding the effectiveness of juries. Juries are intended to be impartial, but they can be susceptible to media influence and may lack the necessary knowledge to decide complex legal matters. The jury selection process, known as voir dire, has been criticized for allowing attorneys to manipulate the jury pool to their advantage.
Today, Singapore's judicial system relies on judges and, in certain cases, Judicial Commissioners, who are appointed for specific periods and possess the powers and functions of judges. Singapore's judiciary is designed to be independent, with the Constitution ensuring that it interprets and enforces laws without influence from other branches of the government.
Local Law Enforcement: Arresting Illegal Aliens?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Singapore's legal system is independent from English law
Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system. The roots of Singapore's legal system can be traced back to the English legal system, and it has evolved over the years. Singapore's law on contracts, torts, equity and trust law, property law, administrative law, and restitution has been created through this common-law tradition.
However, Singapore's legal system is independent from English law. The independent status of Singapore's legal system was established by the repeal of Section 5 of the Civil Law Act on 12 November 1993, by the Application of English Law Act 1993. This Act clarified the extent of the application of English law in Singapore, stating that English common law is only applicable to the circumstances of Singapore and its inhabitants, subject to modifications as required by those circumstances. Singapore's legal system has become increasingly independent from English law, developing a uniquely Singaporean jurisprudence that absorbs the best legal practices from around the world.
While English case law is still referred to in traditional common-law areas, judges also consider decisions from other Commonwealth jurisdictions, such as Australia and Canada, based on their logic rather than their provenance. Additionally, certain Singapore statutes are based on legislation from other jurisdictions, such as Indian law for the interpretation of the Evidence Act and the Penal Code. Singapore's judiciary consists of the Supreme Court and State Courts, with judicial power vested in the Supreme Court and subordinate courts as provided by written law.
Singapore's legal system is recognised for its fairness, integrity, and efficiency, making it one of the best countries for doing business. The country has complemented its courts with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, such as mediation and arbitration, which are cheaper, quicker, and easier than litigation. The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) can arbitrate most civil cases and is enforceable in over 120 countries under the New York Convention.
Depraved Heart Murder: Common Law's Complex Definition
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Singapore's legal system is recognised for its fairness and integrity
Singapore's legal system is recognised for its fairness, integrity, and efficiency. Singapore's legal system is based on the English common law system, a legacy of its history as a British colony. Major areas of law, including administrative law, contract law, equity and trust law, property law, and tort law, are largely shaped by judicial precedent, where decisions from higher courts in previous cases on the same issue are followed when deciding a new case.
Singapore's legal system has evolved to become increasingly independent from English law, developing a uniquely Singaporean jurisprudence. Judges in Singapore continue to refer to English case law, particularly in traditional common-law areas or when interpreting Singaporean statutes based on English enactments. However, they also consider decisions from other Commonwealth jurisdictions, such as Australia and Canada, based on their logic rather than their provenance. Singapore's legal system is well-developed and efficient, with two tiers of courts: the State Courts and the Supreme Court. The State Courts, including District and Magistrate Courts, handle lower-value civil cases and less serious criminal matters directly from the people, providing quick dispute resolution.
Singapore has also established alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, including mediation and arbitration, which offer cheaper, quicker, and easier ways to settle legal issues outside of the traditional court system. Singapore is known for its business-friendly regulatory environment, ranking highly in Asia for intellectual property protection and being recognised as the least corrupt nation in the region. Singapore's legal system is also highly regarded for its protection of intellectual property rights, with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) enforcing decisions that are recognised in over 120 countries under the New York Convention.
Singapore's legal system is comprehensive, with legislation, judicial precedents, and custom recognised as the three sources of law. While the country has been praised for its fairness and efficiency, it has also faced criticism for the criminalisation of activities considered harmless in other countries, such as failing to flush toilets, littering, jaywalking, and the possession of pornography. Nonetheless, Singapore's legal system has contributed to the country's low crime rates and stability, making it an attractive destination for businesses and investors worldwide.
Canadian Law Evolution: Understanding Legislative Amendments
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Yes, Singapore is a common law country.
In a common law country, the main sources of law are habits that live in society as a legal culture, as well as agreements that have been made between parties.
Singapore's law on contracts, torts and restitution has been created through the common law tradition.
Singapore's common law system originates from its history as a British colony.
Yes, other common law countries include the United States, Canada, Great Britain, and India.









































