Abortion Rights: A Legal Battle For Women's Freedom

The topic of abortion laws is a highly controversial issue that has been widely debated in the United States for decades. The discussion centres around the question of whether a woman's right to choose to terminate her pregnancy is protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which held that women have a right to abortion during the first two trimesters of pregnancy, was a landmark case in this debate. However, the Court's recent decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion. This has led to a wave of state-level abortion bans and severe restrictions, impacting the lives of millions of women across the country. The debate surrounding abortion laws continues to be a highly divisive and emotionally charged issue, with strong arguments and justifications presented by both pro-life and pro-choice advocates.

Roe v. Wade

In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in McCorvey's favour, holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy", which protects a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. The Court also held that the right to abortion is not absolute and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life. It resolved these competing interests by announcing a pregnancy trimester timetable to govern all abortion regulations in the United States.

The Supreme Court's decision in Roe was among the most controversial in U.S. history. Anti-abortion politicians and activists sought for decades to restrict abortion or overrule the decision. In 2022, the Supreme Court overruled Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on the grounds that the substantive right to abortion was not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history or tradition".

In the year following the overruling of Roe v. Wade, at least 200 people in the U.S. were prosecuted for conduct relating to their pregnancies – the highest number of cases in a single year ever recorded. The vast majority of these prosecutions do not involve abortions. However, experts warn that this figure is likely an undercount.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of Mississippi's Gestational Age Act, a law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities. The Court's decision in Dobbs addressed whether the Constitution protects the right to an abortion.

In a divided opinion, the Court upheld the Mississippi law and overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). The Court concluded that the Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion and returned the issue of abortion regulation to elected branches and state legislatures.

The Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was based on the interpretation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees certain rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. The Court held that abortion is not among these protected rights as it is not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" and is not "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." The Court also emphasised that abortion was a crime in every state at the time of the Fourteenth Amendment's adoption.

The decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has been highly controversial, with strong opinions on both sides. Those who support the decision argue that it returns the issue of abortion to the states and their citizens, allowing them to regulate abortion according to their values. On the other hand, those who oppose the decision argue that it curtails women's rights and undermines their equality and freedom by removing the constitutional protection for reproductive freedom.

The right to privacy

The Roe v. Wade decision was based on the interpretation that the Constitution's guarantees of liberty covered a right to privacy, which protected a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. This right was founded on the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that the government cannot deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property" without due process of law. The Ninth Amendment, which acknowledges the existence of constitutional rights not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights, also played a role in this interpretation.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade had a significant impact on abortion laws across the United States. It struck down many state laws that banned abortion before 24 weeks and established a framework for regulating abortion based on pregnancy trimesters. However, the decision was controversial and sparked ongoing debates about the legality and extent of abortion rights, as well as the role of moral and religious views in political spheres.

Despite the criticisms and ongoing debates, the right to privacy, as interpreted in Roe v. Wade, remains a significant aspect of constitutional law in the United States. It has had a lasting impact on abortion-related legislation and continues to shape discussions around reproductive rights and privacy.

The right to life

In the United States, the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision held that women have a right to choose to have an abortion during the first two trimesters of pregnancy. This decision was based on the "right of privacy" protected under the Fourteenth Amendment and the conclusion that this right encompassed a woman's decision to carry a pregnancy to term. However, this decision was controversial and has been challenged by those who argue that the fetus has a right to life that should take precedence over the mother's right to privacy.

The "fetal personhood" movement asserts that fetuses have certain constitutional rights, including the right to life. This movement has gained traction in recent years, with several states passing laws attempting to protect the personhood of the fetus. These laws are designed to directly challenge the constitutional premises of Roe v. Wade and establish that life begins at conception, thus granting the fetus the same rights as any other person.

The argument for fetal personhood is often based on scientific evidence, religious beliefs, and interpretations of the Constitution. Proponents of fetal personhood may point to advancements in genetics and fetal development as evidence that a fetus is a distinct human life with a right to life. They may also appeal to natural law philosophy or religious texts, such as the Declaration of Independence, which states that "all men are created equal" and have certain "unalienable rights," including the right to life.

However, the right to life is not absolute, and it is often weighed against other rights and interests. In the context of abortion, the right to life of the fetus is balanced against the rights of the pregnant person, including their right to privacy, autonomy, and bodily integrity. The Supreme Court has recognized that a woman's liberty and privacy interests are paramount, especially in the early stages of pregnancy.

The debate around the right to life and abortion remains highly contentious, with strong arguments on both sides. While some argue that the fetus has a right to life from the moment of conception, others emphasize the rights and autonomy of the pregnant person, particularly in the first trimester when the fetus is not yet viable outside the womb. Ultimately, the question of when life begins and how it should be protected is a complex ethical, legal, and philosophical issue that continues to divide people and shape policies around the world.

The right to liberty

The Roe v. Wade decision affirmed that the right to liberty includes the freedom to make private choices about one's body and health, without undue interference from the state. This liberty encompasses the right to make intimate decisions about family planning, relationships, and bodily integrity. The ruling also acknowledged that the right to liberty includes the freedom from being compelled to be a witness against oneself in a criminal case and protects individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

The Roe v. Wade ruling had far-reaching implications for liberty rights in the U.S. It not only legalised abortion nationwide but also strengthened the constitutional framework protecting related liberty rights. The ruling set a precedent for recognising individual liberty in various contexts, including the right to same-sex marriage, the right to engage in private sexual conduct, and the right to use contraception. These rights are all interconnected and fall under the umbrella of personal liberty, which the state should not infringe upon.

However, the Roe v. Wade decision was not without its critics. Some argued that the ruling was "absurd" from a constitutional perspective and that it interfered with states' rights to regulate abortion. This controversy led to ongoing legal challenges and efforts to overturn the ruling. Despite this opposition, the Roe v. Wade decision stood for nearly 50 years before being overturned in 2022 by the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organisation case, which held that the right to abortion lacked textual grounding in the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions