Arthur Andersen: Accounting Law Violations And Their Consequences

what accounting laws did arthur andersen break

Arthur Andersen LLP was an American accounting firm that provided auditing, tax advising, and consulting services to large corporations. In 2001, it was one of the Big Five accounting firms in the world. However, by mid-2002, the company had collapsed due to its involvement in several accounting scandals, most notably the Enron scandal. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of breaking several laws, including obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron. The firm was also accused of destroying thousands of Enron-related documents, including physical documents, computer files, and emails. These actions led to a loss of public trust and the enactment of new legislation to increase oversight and protect whistleblowers, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Characteristics Values
Illegally shredding documents Thousands of Enron documents, including physical documents, computer files, and email files
Illegally deleting files Nearly 30,000 emails and computer files
Violating antifraud provisions Violations of antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws
Misrepresenting the true value of the corporation Improperly categorising hundreds of millions of dollars as increases in shareholder equity
Not following generally accepted accounting principles Failing to follow GAAP when considering Enron's dealings with related partnerships
Obstruction of justice Convicted on June 15, 2002

lawshun

Arthur Andersen LLP was an American accounting firm that provided auditing, tax advising, and consulting services to large corporations. By 2001, it had become one of the world's largest multinational corporations and was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms. However, its involvement in the Enron scandal led to its downfall and conviction for obstruction of justice.

The Enron scandal was an accounting scandal that erupted when American energy company Enron Corporation filed for bankruptcy after news of widespread internal fraud became public in October 2001. Enron was found to have engaged in accounting loopholes, misuse of mark-to-market accounting, special purpose entities, and poor financial reporting to hide billions of dollars in debt. Arthur Andersen, as Enron's auditor, failed to detect this widespread fraud and was also accused of shredding thousands of Enron-related documents.

On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding Enron-related documents. This conviction was later unanimously reversed by the Supreme Court in 2005, which found that the jury instructions were too vague and did not establish that Andersen knew it had broken the law or that there was a link to any official proceeding prohibiting document destruction. However, by the time of the reversal, Andersen had already lost most of its business and employees, and it never returned as a viable entity.

The fallout from the Enron scandal and Andersen's conviction led to significant changes in the accounting industry and increased regulatory oversight. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed to establish stricter regulations for public companies and accounting firms, aiming to prevent similar scandals and protect investors. The Act raised the bar for auditing standards and increased accountability for auditors and companies.

In summary, Arthur Andersen's conviction for obstruction of justice in the Enron scandal had far-reaching consequences, leading to the firm's demise and significant reforms in the accounting industry to restore trust and prevent future scandals.

lawshun

The firm was placed on probation and fined $500,000

The accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP was placed on probation and fined $500,000 following its involvement in the Enron scandal.

Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron. The firm was also found guilty of destroying thousands of Enron documents, including physical documents, computer files, and emails. This was in addition to accusations that Andersen had overlooked significant sums of money that had not been represented on Enron's books.

The scandal led to the collapse of Arthur Andersen, which, by 2001, had become one of the world's largest multinational corporations and was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms. The firm's downfall was swift: by the end of 2002, it was effectively out of business, unable to recover from the damage done by the Enron case.

The Enron scandal involved massive accounting fraud that inflated the company's profits and hid its debt. Arthur Andersen was responsible for auditing Enron's financial statements but failed to detect the widespread fraud. The failure of Arthur Andersen to uncover the fraud at Enron, coupled with its destruction of critical evidence, led to Enron's bankruptcy and the dissolution of Andersen's once-illustrious accounting firm.

The scandal exposed severe lapses in corporate governance and auditing practices, leaving a lasting impact on the accounting industry and resulting in new regulations and legislation to expand the accuracy of financial reporting for public companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed to establish stricter regulations for public companies and accounting firms, aiming to prevent another scandal like Enron.

lawshun

Arthur Andersen was also involved in other high-profile accounting scandals

Arthur Andersen LLP was an American accounting firm that provided auditing, tax advising, consulting, and other professional services to large corporations. By 2001, it had become one of the world's largest multinational corporations and was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms. However, the company collapsed by mid-2002 as details of its questionable accounting practices for Enron and WorldCom were revealed amid two high-profile bankruptcies.

In the case of Waste Management, Arthur Andersen was found to have knowingly or recklessly issued false and misleading unqualified audit reports on the company's annual financial statements for the years 1993 through 1996. The audit reports stated that the company's financial statements were presented fairly and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), when in fact, they were not. This resulted in a civil settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), with Arthur Andersen agreeing to pay a $7 million fine.

In addition to Waste Management, Arthur Andersen was also accused of mismanagement in the audits of Sunbeam and Asia Pulp & Paper. These allegations further damaged the firm's credibility and reputation, contributing to its fall from grace.

The fallout from these scandals had far-reaching consequences, leading to increased scrutiny of the accounting industry and the enactment of new regulations to improve corporate governance and financial reporting.

lawshun

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in 2002 to increase oversight and protect whistleblowers

Arthur Andersen was once one of the Big Five accounting firms, providing auditing, tax advising, and consulting services to large corporations. However, its involvement in the Enron scandal, as well as other accounting scandals, led to its downfall. The firm was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron, an energy company that had engaged in institutional and systematic accounting fraud. The indictment also put a spotlight on the firm's faulty audits of other companies, including Waste Management, Sunbeam, and WorldCom.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act established new and enhanced standards for public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. Under the Act, public companies must adopt a business ethics code and create an internal procedure for reviewing and soliciting employee reports about fraud or ethical violations. The Act also provides protection for whistleblowers who disclose information about violations of federal securities law, SEC rules, or any federal law related to fraud against shareholders.

The Act's provisions cover the responsibilities of company boards and add criminal penalties for certain types of corporate misconduct. It applies to all domestic public companies, as well as non-public companies with publicly traded debt securities. Some sections of the Act also apply to companies that do business with publicly traded companies, even if they are not publicly traded themselves.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act had a significant impact on the auditing landscape, imposing stricter rules on public accounting firms and increasing the accountability of auditors. It also required more rigorous financial disclosures and established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to oversee audits. The Act's primary goal was to protect investors, ensure the integrity of financial reporting, and restore confidence in financial markets.

lawshun

Arthur Andersen lost its licence to audit public companies

Arthur Andersen was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms in the United States, and it had served as Enron's auditor for 16 years. The company was found guilty on federal charges of destroying thousands of documents related to Enron, which obstructed justice. As a result, Arthur Andersen surrendered its CPA licenses and its right to practice before the SEC on August 31, 2002, effectively putting the firm out of business.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not accept audits from convicted felons, and so Arthur Andersen lost its licence to audit public companies. By the time the ruling was overturned at the Supreme Court, the company had already lost most of its business and two-thirds of its 28,000 employees.

The scandal involving Enron and Arthur Andersen's collapse led to the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which introduced stricter regulations for public companies and accounting firms to prevent another similar scandal. The Act raised the bar for auditing standards and ensured companies were more closely scrutinised.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act remains one of the most important regulatory responses to corporate scandals in U.S. history. It raised the standards for corporate governance, financial reporting, and auditing. The Act serves as a reminder that a failure in accounting oversight can lead not only to the collapse of a corporation but also to the destruction of entire firms, industries, and public trust.

Frequently asked questions

Arthur Andersen was found guilty of breaking US federal laws when it was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding thousands of documents and deleting emails and computer files related to its audit of Enron.

The actions of Arthur Andersen contributed to the collapse of Enron, which was at the time the largest bankruptcy reorganisation in US history. The scandal also effectively closed Arthur Andersen, which surrendered its CPA licenses and its right to practice, leading to the loss of 85,000 jobs.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed to increase oversight and protect whistleblowers, while the Public Oversight Board (POB) voted to disband, leaving the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) as the leader of self-regulation in the accounting profession.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment