Avoiding Illegal Actions: What Breaks Hipaa Law?

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a US law that protects sensitive health information from disclosure without a patient's consent. It prohibits healthcare providers and businesses from disclosing protected information to anyone other than a patient and their authorised representatives. Breaking HIPAA law can result in civil and criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment.

There are four potential outcomes for members of a covered entity's or business associate's workforce who break HIPAA law: the violation could be dealt with internally by an employer, their contract of employment could be terminated, they could face sanctions from professional boards, or they could face criminal charges which include fines and imprisonment.

Failure to conduct regular risk assessments

Regular risk assessments are a critical component of HIPAA compliance. Failure to conduct them can result in significant fines and penalties for non-compliance, ranging from $100 to $50,000 per violation, with a maximum penalty of $1.5 million per year for violations of an identical provision.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates that covered entities and their business associates conduct regular risk assessments to ensure compliance with the Privacy Rule and protect the privacy of Protected Health Information (PHI). These assessments are a systematic process to evaluate potential risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

By failing to conduct regular risk assessments, organizations miss the opportunity to identify vulnerabilities in their security measures and determine the potential impact of data breaches on patient privacy. This can lead to costly data breaches, as well as damage to their reputation.

Additionally, regular risk assessments are essential for maintaining continual compliance and risk management. They should be conducted at least annually and whenever there are significant changes in the organization or new threats emerge.

Furthermore, the risk analysis section of the Security Rule emphasizes the need for covered entities and business associates to conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI. This includes evaluating threats, vulnerabilities, and the potential impact of a breach.

In conclusion, failure to conduct regular risk assessments can result in severe consequences, including financial penalties, damage to reputation, and a negative impact on patient privacy. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to prioritize conducting these assessments to ensure HIPAA compliance and protect sensitive information.

Inadequate workforce training on HIPAA rules

The consequences of inadequate workforce training can be severe and include civil and criminal penalties, fines, and imprisonment. If a violation occurs due to insufficient training, the covered entity or business associate is at fault and may be subject to sanctions by the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and state attorneys general. To prevent disputes, employers are required to document the training provided, including the content, timing, and attendees.

To ensure compliance, covered entities and business associates should develop comprehensive training programs that address the specific roles and functions of their workforce members. The training should be tailored to the unique policies and procedures of the organization, which are based on risk assessments and the nature of the PHI handled. The frequency of training may vary, but it is generally recommended to provide initial training for new hires and ongoing periodic refresher training to address material changes, emerging threats, and updates to HIPAA regulations.

The objectives of workforce training should go beyond mere compliance and aim to empower employees to perform their functions efficiently while upholding patient privacy and safety. By fostering a strong culture of compliance, organizations can reduce the risk of violations and enhance their reputation and trust among patients.

Lack of safeguards to protect PHI

A lack of safeguards to protect PHI (Protected Health Information) is a violation of HIPAA law. This can include the failure to implement appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect PHI. Here are 4-6 paragraphs detailing this aspect of HIPAA compliance:

The HIPAA Security Rule establishes a national set of security standards to protect health information. It sets forth the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards that covered entities and their business associates must put in place to secure individuals' electronic protected health information (ePHI). The Security Rule is designed to be flexible, scalable, and technology-neutral, allowing regulated entities to implement policies, procedures, and technologies that are appropriate for their size, organizational structure, and risks.

The administrative safeguards involve administrative actions, policies, and procedures to manage the selection, development, implementation, and maintenance of security measures. This includes conducting risk assessments, providing workforce training, and appointing a security official to oversee the implementation of security measures. Physical safeguards focus on securing the physical environment where ePHI is stored and accessed, such as controlling access to facilities and workstations and ensuring the proper disposal and handling of electronic media.

Technical safeguards deal with the implementation of technology solutions to protect ePHI, including the use of encryption, access control mechanisms, and audit controls. Organizations must also implement audit controls to monitor and record system activities and transmission security controls to protect the integrity and confidentiality of ePHI during transmission. All of these measures help to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI, which are key objectives of the Security Rule.

To comply with the HIPAA Security Rule, covered entities must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all ePHI. This includes detecting and safeguarding against anticipated threats to the security of the information and protecting against anticipated impermissible uses or disclosures. Covered entities should also certify compliance by their workforce and rely on professional ethics and best judgment when considering requests for permissive uses and disclosures of PHI.

Failure to comply with HIPAA can result in civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties for HIPAA violations can be imposed on covered entities or business associates and can range from $137 per violation to $2,067,813 when attributable to willful neglect and not corrected within 30 days. Criminal violations of HIPAA can result in fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment. Therefore, it is crucial for covered entities and their business associates to implement appropriate safeguards to protect PHI and avoid potential penalties.

Disclosure of PHI without patient consent

The disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) without patient consent is a violation of HIPAA law. The Privacy Rule protects all "individually identifiable health information" held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. This includes information relating to an individual's past, present, or future physical or mental health condition, the provision of their health care, and the past, present, or future payment for the provision of their health care.

Covered entities are defined as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers who electronically transmit PHI in connection with transactions for which the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has adopted standards. Most healthcare providers qualify as a covered entity, but some are exempted. Business associates are businesses with whom a covered entity shares PHI to help carry out covered activities and functions.

There are certain instances where a covered entity may disclose PHI without patient consent. This includes:

• To prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health and safety of a person or the public based on the health care provider's professional judgment.
• To treat the patient or coordinate treatment with other healthcare providers.
• To ensure public health and safety, such as reporting to public health authorities or notifying individuals at risk of contracting or spreading a disease.
• To notify family, friends, or other persons involved in the patient's care, as well as the police, press, or public in certain circumstances.
• To carry out public interest and benefit activities, such as required by law, public health activities, health oversight activities, judicial and administrative proceedings, and law enforcement purposes.
• For research purposes, as long as certain conditions are met.
• To facilitate the donation and transplantation of cadaveric organs, eyes, and tissue.
• For essential government functions, such as assuring the proper execution of a military mission or conducting intelligence activities authorized by law.
• For workers' compensation purposes, as authorized by law.

When disclosing PHI without patient consent, covered entities must still adhere to the minimum necessary standard, which requires that only the minimum amount of PHI needed to accomplish the intended purpose of the disclosure is shared.

Violations of HIPAA law can result in civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties for covered entities and business associates start at $137 per violation and can rise to $2,067,813 when attributable to willful neglect and not corrected within 30 days. Criminal penalties for individuals and organizations can include fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to 10 years for knowingly and wrongfully disclosing PHI without authorization.

Failure to provide patients with access to their PHI

The HIPAA Privacy Rule gives patients the right to access their health records in a timely and cost-effective manner. This includes the right to inspect or obtain a copy of their Protected Health Information (PHI) and to direct the covered entity to transmit a copy to a designated person or entity of their choice.

Covered entities are required to respond to an individual's right-of-access request within 30 days of receiving the request, with an option for a 30-day extension. A covered entity's failure to respond within this timeframe is considered a violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule and can result in hefty monetary penalties and mandated corrective action plans.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has been consistently resolving cases with healthcare organizations across the country over alleged failures to provide timely and complete access to health records. Since the launch of the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative in 2019, OCR has settled several investigations related to potential violations of the right-of-access standard.

To avoid violating the HIPAA Privacy Rule, covered entities should ensure that they have a solid understanding of a patient's right to access their health records and how to provide that access in a timely and compliant manner. This includes understanding the designated record set, which refers to records that consist of medical and billing records, enrollment information, payment details, claims adjudication, and case or medical management record systems. Covered entities should also be aware of the limited exceptions to the right of access, which include psychotherapy notes and information to be used in legal actions.

In addition to timely responses, covered entities must also ensure that they do not impose unreasonable measures on individuals requesting access to their health records. This includes requiring individuals to submit requests through a web portal or to provide extensive information that is not necessary to fulfil the request. Covered entities should also accommodate an individual's preferred format for receiving their health records, whether it be a paper or electronic copy. If the information is not readily producible in the preferred format, the covered entity must work with the requester to agree on an alternative readable format.

Covered entities may charge a reasonable, cost-based fee for providing individuals with a copy of their health records. This fee can only include the cost of labour for copying the PHI, supplies for creating paper or electronic copies, postage, and the preparation of a summary or explanation of the PHI if requested. Other costs, such as those associated with verification, documentation, and searching for and retrieving the PHI, cannot be included in the fee.

Frequently asked questions