Royal Family Lawbreakers: What Are The Consequences?

what happens if the royal family break the law

The British Royal Family is exempt from various laws. While the late Queen Elizabeth II and King Charles III are/were allowed to break any law, other members of the family also enjoy certain legal privileges. For instance, they don't have to pay taxes in certain instances, they are exempt from jury duty, and they don't have to obey the speed limit when driven by police on official royal duties. The Queen also did not need a passport or a driver's license to travel.

Characteristics Values
Sovereign Immunity The monarch cannot be prosecuted under civil or criminal investigations
Speed Limits The royal family can break speed limits when driven by police on official royal duties
Passport The monarch does not need a passport to travel
Driver's License The monarch does not need a driver's license
Last Name The royal family does not need to use their legal last names
Custody of Descendants The monarch has automatic legal custody of all their descendants and minor grandchildren
Taxes The royal family is exempt from paying taxes in certain instances
Jury Duty The royal family is exempt from jury duty
Freedom of Information Act The royal family is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act

lawshun

The monarch can break any law

This rule has applied to previous monarchs, including Queen Elizabeth II, and will continue to apply to King Charles III and any future monarchs. While the monarch has this power, it is important to note that the royal family's official website states that the Queen was careful to ensure that her activities were carried out in strict accordance with the law. This statement is likely to remain true for the current King.

The monarch's exemption from the law also extends to other areas. For example, the monarch does not need a passport to travel, as all UK passports are issued in the name of the monarch. Similarly, the monarch is not required to have a driver's license, although they can drive and are often seen driving on their private estates.

Another interesting exemption is that the monarch has automatic legal custody of all their descendants and minor grandchildren. This rule, dating back to King George I in the early 1700s, means that the monarch could technically take a child away from their parents. However, it is highly unlikely that this power would ever be exercised.

While the monarch has these unique powers, it is important to note that they are primarily symbolic and are not intended to be used to break the law. The monarch is expected to act as a role model and uphold the values and traditions of the country.

Obama's Actions: Federal Law Violation?

You may want to see also

lawshun

The monarch has automatic custody of their grandchildren

The British Royal Family has a long and complex history with certain laws and rules that appear to be relaxed for its members. While the monarch is not exempt from the law, they do enjoy sovereign immunity, meaning they cannot be prosecuted under civil or criminal investigations. This means that while the monarch can break the law, they cannot be arrested or face any civil or criminal proceedings. This rule applies to the current King, Charles III, and previously to Queen Elizabeth II.

The monarch also has automatic legal custody of their descendants and minor grandchildren, according to a 300-year-old rule established in 1717. This rule was first implemented when King George I disagreed with his son, the future King George II, over how he was raising his children. Judges ruled in King George I's favour, stating that "the king's right of supervision extended to his grandchildren and this right of right belongs to His Majesty, King of the Realm, even during their father's lifetime." This rule has been passed down through the monarchy, and while it is unlikely that the current monarch would take custody of their grandchildren, the law is still technically in place.

It is important to note that this rule does not give the monarch legal custody of their great-grandchildren. Queen Elizabeth II did not have legal custody of her great-grandchildren, including Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, the children of Prince William and Kate Middleton, as well as Archie and Lilibet, the children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. While the Queen may have had some input on major parenting decisions, such as approving air travel, she did not have the same legal authority over her great-grandchildren as she would have over her grandchildren.

In addition to this custody rule, the Royal Family enjoys several other perks and exemptions. They are not required to pay taxes in certain instances, and they are exempt from jury duty. The monarch is not required to have a driver's license or use a passport when travelling. They are also not required to use their legal last name, which is Mountbatten-Windsor for the male-line descendants of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip.

lawshun

The monarch doesn't need a passport

The monarch of the United Kingdom does not require a passport when travelling overseas. This is because all passports issued in the UK are issued in the name of the monarch, and therefore the monarch does not need to prove their identity. This was true of Queen Elizabeth II, and is now true of King Charles III. All other members of the Royal Family, including the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of Wales, are required to have passports.

The monarch's status as an exception to the passport rule also means that they are not required to have a driver's license. Queen Elizabeth trained as a driver and mechanic during World War II, but she never had to take a driving test and was able to drive without a number plate. Now that he is the monarch, King Charles is also exempt from needing a driver's license.

The Royal Family is also exempt from other laws, such as taxes, jury duty, and speed limits when travelling with a police escort. The monarch is also allowed to break any law without being arrested or prosecuted, as they are effectively exempt from civil and criminal proceedings.

lawshun

The monarch doesn't need a driver's license

The monarch of the United Kingdom is the only person in the country who does not need a driver's license to drive. This is because all driving licenses in the UK are issued in the name of the monarch, and it would be redundant for the Queen or King to issue themselves a driving license.

Queen Elizabeth II, for example, never needed to take a driving test and was able to drive without a number plate. During World War II, then-Princess Elizabeth trained as a driver and mechanic for the Women's Auxiliary Territorial Service. Over the years, she carried out much of her driving on private land, such as on her Balmoral estate in Scotland, but she was also often seen driving herself to one of her favourite events, the Royal Windsor Horse Show.

Now that he is King, Charles III is also no longer required to use a driver's license. All other members of the Royal Family, however, are required to pass a driving test before they can get their driving license.

The Law and Morality: Who is a Criminal?

You may want to see also

lawshun

The monarchy is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act

The British monarchy has long been a cornerstone of the UK's identity, with the sovereign serving as both the symbolic and actual head of state. While the monarchy is expected to uphold certain traditions and duties, it also enjoys several privileges and exemptions from laws that apply to the general public. One notable exemption is the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The Freedom of Information Act came into force on January 1, 2005, in the UK, granting citizens the right to request access to information held by public authorities. This act promotes transparency and enables the public to access information relating to government activities and decisions. However, the monarchy is specifically excluded from the provisions of this act.

According to the royal family's official website, "The Royal Household is not a public authority within the meaning of the FOI Acts, and is therefore exempt from their provisions." This exemption means that the royal family is not obligated to disclose information about their day-to-day duties and financials to the same extent as public authorities. While the Royal Household does release an annual financial report, the UK public does not have access to detailed information on its spending.

The monarchy's exemption from the FOIA allows for greater privacy and confidentiality for the royal family. This exemption covers communications with the sovereign, the heir to the throne, and the second in line to the throne. It also includes information relating to the royal family's personal finances and activities undertaken in a private capacity, which are protected by the Data Protection Act.

While the monarchy's exemption from the FOIA may grant them a certain level of privacy, it's important to note that the Royal Household has stated its commitment to transparency and providing information as freely as possible. They release annual financial reports and provide details of public funding for the Head of State. Additionally, the Royal Collection Trust, which manages the royal art collection, also publishes information about its activities and expenditures annually, despite not being a public authority under the FOIA.

Frequently asked questions

The British royal family is not above the law, but the monarch is allowed to break any law and is exempt from prosecution. They can't be arrested or be the subject of civil and criminal proceedings. This means that, technically, the Queen could get away with murder. However, it's important to note that the royal family's official website states that the Queen ensures that all her activities are carried out in strict accordance with the law.

Many of these exemptions only apply to the reigning monarch and not to their husband or family. However, the royal family as a whole is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, which allows them to exercise more privacy over their day-to-day duties and financials. Additionally, when the king, prime minister, or other members of the royal family are driven by police officers on official royal business, they are exempt from speed limits.

The royal family does not have to use their legal last names, even though they technically have one—Mountbatten-Windsor. They are also exempt from paying taxes in certain instances, and they don't have to participate in jury duty. The Queen is not required to have a driver's license or a passport. Lastly, the monarch has automatic legal custody of all their descendants and minor grandchildren.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment