Unintentional Lawbreaking: Navigating Legal Consequences

Breaking the law is something that few people ever intend to do, but it's easy to do so by mistake. Ignorance of the law is not a permissible legal defence, and you can still be charged if the district attorney chooses to pursue the charge. In the US, the majority of crimes committed are state crimes, and criminal laws and procedures vary from state to state. For example, in some states, it is illegal to fail to update your driver's license when you move, or to fail to get a dog license for your pet.

Ignorance of the law is not a permissible legal defence

This principle is based on the presumption that citizens understand and act according to the laws, as they have been made known to the public and are accessible to everyone. However, it is important to note that ignorance of the law may be considered a mitigating factor in sentencing, especially when the law is unclear or when the accused sought advice from relevant authorities before acting.

While ignorance of the law is generally not a defence, there are limited circumstances where it can be presented as a legitimate defence. For example, if a new law has been passed without sufficient publicity and awareness, ignorance of that law may be accepted as a defence. Additionally, in certain cases, a specific intent or mental state is required for a crime to be committed, and if the accused was unaware that their actions constituted a crime, they may have a valid defence.

In conclusion, while ignorance of the law is not typically a permissible defence, there are rare exceptions where the context of the accusation and the specific circumstances of the case may allow for it. If you find yourself in a situation where you have broken the law unknowingly, it is best to seek legal assistance from an experienced criminal defence attorney.

Unclear laws may result in unintended criminality

In a world where laws are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly complex, it is not surprising that individuals sometimes find themselves inadvertently breaking the law. While ignorance of the law is generally not a permissible defence, unclear or ambiguous laws can lead to situations where people unintentionally commit crimes. This issue is further exacerbated by the fact that laws can vary significantly between states and municipalities, making it challenging for individuals to stay informed about all applicable laws in their area.

One example of an unclear law can be found in gun legislation. In the UK, for instance, a replica gun must be over 50% non-realistic in colour to be used without a defence. However, the lack of clarity surrounding what constitutes an "unrealistic colour" can lead to confusion and potential criminality for those who own replica guns. Similarly, in the US, certain states allow the ownership of "deactivated" firearms, but the definition of "deactivated" can vary, leading to potential misunderstandings and legal issues.

Another area where unclear laws can result in unintended criminality is in the realm of cyber activities. With the constant advancements in technology, it can be challenging for laws to keep up with emerging trends and behaviours. For example, the use of unsecured WiFi (also known as piggybacking) may be illegal in certain jurisdictions, but the specifics of what constitutes "unsecured WiFi" and the consequences of using it may not always be clear to the average person.

Furthermore, laws surrounding online activities, such as downloading or sharing copyrighted materials, can be complex and confusing. While piracy and copyright infringement are widely recognised as illegal, the specifics of what constitutes infringement and the penalties for such actions may not be common knowledge. As a result, individuals may unintentionally engage in illegal activities without realising the legal implications.

Lastly, laws regarding driving and traffic regulations can also be unclear or subject to interpretation. For example, the definition of "reckless driving" or the specifics of when and where jaywalking is permitted or prohibited can vary between locations, leading to situations where individuals unintentionally break the law.

In conclusion, while it is important to emphasise that ignorance of the law is generally not accepted as a valid excuse for criminal behaviour, it is also crucial to acknowledge that unclear or ambiguous laws can contribute to unintended criminality. To mitigate this issue, individuals should make an effort to stay informed about the laws in their specific area and seek legal advice when in doubt.

Minor crimes are often committed without concern

It is not uncommon for people to break the law without even realizing it. This could be due to a lack of awareness of the law, unclear laws, or simply not considering that an action is illegal. While ignorance of the law is typically not a permissible legal defense, it is still possible to accidentally commit a minor crime.

A poll by onepoll.com found that the average person commits around seven crimes per week, with speeding being the most common offense. Other frequent minor crimes include talking or texting while driving, littering, illegally downloading music, riding a bicycle on the sidewalk, and not wearing a seatbelt. These so-called minor crimes are committed so regularly that they have almost become normalized, with many people not considering them to be illegal or serious.

Prank calling, for example, may be considered a harmless rite of passage for adolescents, but it can actually be illegal in some areas, constituting harassment or disorderly conduct. Similarly, using unsecured WiFi, or "piggybacking," may not seem like a big deal, but it can get you into trouble with internet service providers and, in some places, may even be illegal. Failing to update your driver's license when you move to a new state is another common offense that people might not think twice about.

While these minor crimes often carry relatively minor consequences such as fines or warnings, they can still result in legal trouble. It is important to be aware of the laws in your area and take responsibility for your actions to avoid unintentionally breaking the law.

Juvenile court processes differ from adult court

Firstly, the age of the defendant is a significant factor. In New York, for example, individuals under 16 are typically considered juveniles, while in California, minors between 12 and 17 can be tried in juvenile court. The adult court generally handles cases involving those 18 years of age and older.

The terminology used in juvenile court is also different. Here, a young offender is referred to as a "juvenile delinquent" rather than a "defendant". The focus of juvenile court is on rehabilitation and treatment, whereas adult court emphasizes punishment and accountability.

Juvenile courts and adult courts have different jurisdictions. The juvenile court has jurisdiction over cases involving minors, regardless of the nature of the offense. Adult court handles cases involving individuals aged 16 or older, with exceptions for certain serious offenses committed by juveniles, which can be tried in adult court.

The objectives of sentencing also differ. In juvenile court, the primary goal is rehabilitation and the best interests of the child. The emphasis is on addressing the underlying issues that led to the delinquent behavior and providing resources for the juvenile's rehabilitation. Adult court, on the other hand, focuses on punishment and deterrence, often resulting in more severe penalties, including incarceration.

Another distinction is the handling of criminal records. In juvenile court, records are generally sealed and not accessible to the public. This is to provide young offenders with a fresh start once they have completed their rehabilitation programs. In contrast, adult court criminal records are typically more accessible and can impact employment and housing opportunities.

Involuntary commitment to juvenile facilities is another major difference. For juveniles, involuntary commitment is often used when there is a risk that an offender may reoffend if left in the community. Juveniles can be committed to juvenile detention centers for a period of time determined by a judge, usually several months or less.

Additionally, in the adult criminal justice system, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the offense was committed with criminal intent. In the juvenile system, however, the prosecutor does not need to show criminal intent; they only need to prove that the juvenile committed the offense.

Criminal laws vary between states

Each state has its own penal code, and while federal laws are applicable across all state borders, states are permitted to create, implement, and enforce their own laws in addition to federal laws. This is because each state is a sovereign entity with the power to create and regulate laws according to its unique characteristics, such as geography, natural resources, demographics, community standards, and public policies.

Some laws, like voting laws and criminal statutes, tend to be somewhat uniform across states, but there are certain areas of law that may vary significantly. For instance, in addition to gun control and marriage licensing laws, differences can be found in trucking and motor carrier laws, business and corporate laws, and divorce laws.

The criminal law system in the US is complex, with two main systems: state criminal law and federal law. State criminal law is the most frequent, and the federal government can only exercise powers granted to it by the Constitution, which limits federal laws to specific areas like drug crimes due to their impact on interstate commerce.

The American Model Penal Code defines the purpose of criminal law as preventing conduct that causes harm to people or society, maintaining public order, defining criminal acts, informing the public about what constitutes a crime, and distinguishing minor from serious offenses. While criminal laws share many characteristics across states, key differences exist in how the laws are written, the behaviours they regulate, and the punishments they impose.

Frequently asked questions