Criminal Acts: Understanding Illegal Actions And Their Consequences

what is an act that breaks a criminal law

Criminal law is a system of laws concerned with crimes and the punishment of individuals who commit them. A crime is any act or omission that breaks a federal or state criminal law and causes harm to people or society. Criminal laws vary significantly among states and the federal government, and each state decides what conduct to designate as a crime. While some statutes resemble the common law criminal code, others closely mimic the Model Penal Code (MPC). An individual commits a crime if they act in a way that fulfils every element of an offence. In general, every crime involves three elements: the act or conduct (actus reus); the individual's mental state at the time of the act (mens rea); and the causation between the act and the effect.

Characteristics Values
Definition An act that breaks a federal or state criminal law and causes harm to people or society
Prosecution The government decides whether to punish an individual for an act or omission
Crime Any act or omission in violation of a law prohibiting said action or omission
Criminal Law A system of laws concerned with crimes and the punishment of individuals who commit crimes
Criminal Statutes Originally derived from common law, which developed from court decisions over time
Mens Rea The required mental state that a person must have to be guilty of a specific crime
Actus Reus The actual physical act or omission that a person must commit to be guilty of a crime
Categories of Crime Felonies, misdemeanors, inchoate offenses, and strict liability offenses
Criminal Procedure The specific procedures that must take place during a criminal proceeding
Elements of Crime Act or conduct, individual's mental state, and causation between the act and its effect

lawshun

Actus Reus

In some cases, an omission can also be considered an actus reus. This is true when an individual had a duty to act and failed to do so, resulting in injury. For example, if a statute requires a person to act in a certain way, or if a contract or special relationship creates a duty to act, their failure to act can be considered an actus reus.

The general test of guilt requires proof of fault, culpability, or blameworthiness in both thought and action. While the presence of a "guilty mind" is necessary, what goes on inside a person's head is never enough in itself to constitute a crime.

Antonio Brown: Lawbreaker or Innocent?

You may want to see also

lawshun

Mens Rea

The concept of mens rea is particularly important in distinguishing between different types of crimes and assigning appropriate punishments. For example, the mens rea for murder may be "malice", while for fraud, it may be "fraudulence". The mental state required for a crime can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific crime in question.

In some cases, a “bad state of mind" or criminal intent must be proven in addition to the actus reus for a person to be found guilty. This is where the concept of mens rea comes into play. Mens rea can include different levels of culpability, such as acting "purposely", "knowingly", "recklessly", or "negligently". These terms define the degree of intention or awareness behind a criminal act.

The Model Penal Code (MPC), developed in the United States, provides a framework for understanding mens rea. It categorizes the levels of mens rea into four states of mind that give rise to criminal liability: negligence, recklessness, knowledge, and purpose. These levels work in a hierarchy, with negligence as the lowest mental state and purpose as the highest.

It is important to note that not all crimes require proof of mens rea. Strict liability crimes, such as statutory rape or bigamy, hold individuals liable regardless of their mental state. Additionally, jurisdictions may differ in their interpretation and application of mens rea, and some may use alternative terminology.

In summary, mens rea refers to the mental state or intention behind a criminal act. It is a crucial element in criminal law, distinguishing between different types of crimes and assigning appropriate punishments. The concept of mens rea helps ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions and are not punished without the necessary criminal intent.

Brexit Leave Campaign: Lawbreakers?

You may want to see also

lawshun

Criminal intent

Criminal law is a system of laws concerned with crimes and the punishment of individuals who commit them. A crime is any act or omission that breaks a federal or state law, and it can generally be separated into four categories: felonies, misdemeanours, inchoate offences, and strict liability offences.

The traditional approach to criminal law views a crime as an act that is morally wrong. However, modern perspectives take a more pragmatic view, focusing on the prevention of crime and the protection and reform of the offender. Criminal law is just one of several devices used by societies to protect individual interests and ensure the survival of the group.

To establish criminal intent, or mens rea, the prosecution must prove that the individual had the required mental state at the time of the act. This means that they intended to commit the crime and were not acting by accident or under duress, for example. Mens rea refers to the mental element of a crime, while actus reus refers to the physical act or omission that constitutes a crime. Both actus reus and mens rea must be proven by the prosecution for an individual to be found guilty.

In the US, criminal law is derived from common law, which has developed from court decisions over time. The Model Penal Code (MPC) provides an overview of the types of crimes in the US legal system and influences state criminal codes and procedures. While Congress has chosen to punish certain conduct by codifying federal criminal law, each state decides what conduct to designate as a crime and has its own criminal code. As a result, criminal laws vary significantly across states and the federal government.

lawshun

Criminal procedure

The criminal procedure can be broadly broken down into the following steps:

  • Arrest: The first step in the criminal procedure is the arrest of a suspect by the police. The suspect is then booked and informed of their Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.
  • Preliminary Hearing: During the preliminary hearing, the suspect appears before a judge, and bail is set. This is also when the suspect is informed of the charges against them, known as a writ of habeas corpus.
  • Indictment: At this stage, a grand jury or judge hears the evidence presented and formally charges the suspect.
  • Arraignment: The defendant appears in court, is formally charged, and is asked to plead guilty or not guilty. If the defendant pleads guilty, they may accept a plea bargain. If they plead not guilty, a trial date is set.
  • Trial: The trial is where the case is heard and a decision is made by a judge or jury. If the defendant is found not guilty, they are acquitted. If found guilty, the judge determines the sentencing.

It is important to note that the specific procedures and laws can vary between states and the federal government. The prosecution has the burden of proof and must establish every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This includes the actus reus (the physical act or conduct) and the mens rea (the mental state) of the accused at the time of the act.

In terms of sentencing, crimes are generally classified into two main categories: felonies and misdemeanors. Felonies are more serious crimes that carry harsher punishments, including imprisonment in state or federal prison and fines. Misdemeanors, on the other hand, are less severe crimes punishable by local jail time and/or fines. The sentencing guidelines vary between federal and state courts, with federal courts following the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and state courts referring to state-specific guidelines.

lawshun

Criminal sentencing

Sentencing Principles

There are four main principles that guide criminal sentencing:

  • Proportionality: The punishment should be proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the culpability of the defendant.
  • Rehabilitation: The goal is not only to punish but also to rehabilitate offenders and help them reintegrate into society.
  • Deterrence: Sentencing aims to deter both the convicted individual and others from committing similar crimes in the future.
  • Retribution: Some models emphasise retribution, which posits that the criminal deserves punishment for their actions.

Types of Sentences

The type of sentence imposed can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the crime. Sentences can include:

  • Probation
  • Fines
  • Short-term incarceration
  • Suspended sentences
  • Payment of restitution to the victim
  • Community service
  • Drug and alcohol rehabilitation (for minor crimes)
  • Long-term incarceration
  • Life imprisonment
  • Death penalty (in capital cases)

Factors Considered in Sentencing

When determining an appropriate sentence, judges will consider a range of factors, including:

  • The nature and severity of the offense: The sentence should reflect the gravity of the crime committed.
  • Level of responsibility: In crimes involving multiple people, the offender's level of responsibility may be considered.
  • Defendant's criminal history: Prior convictions, particularly for similar offenses, may result in more severe sentences.
  • Mitigating factors: These include the defendant's age, mental health, financial situation, and expression of regret for the crime.
  • Aggravating factors: The presence of aggravating factors, such as the use of violence or the defendant's previous failure to pay fines, may lead to a more severe sentence.
  • Victim impact statements: These statements detail the emotional and financial effects of the crime on the victim and can influence the amount of restitution awarded.

Sentencing Guidelines

In the United States, sentencing guidelines have been established at both the federal and state levels. Federal courts use the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, while state courts refer to state-specific guidelines. These guidelines provide judges with a framework for sentencing decisions, ensuring consistency and fairness in punishment.

Frequently asked questions

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment