Common Law And Statute Law: How Are They Related?

The relationship between current statute law and common law is a complex one, with both systems of law co-existing and influencing each other. Common law, or 'judge-made law', is based on past judicial opinions and precedents, evolving over time and across jurisdictions. Statute law, on the other hand, is written law created by legislative bodies, such as Parliament, and is more rigid in its application. While common law is more flexible and adaptable to societal changes, statute law provides a foundation of codified rules that are widely accessible and applicable. The interaction between these two legal systems is dynamic, with common law principles often being codified into statute law and statutory laws sometimes requiring interpretation by judges, who may refer to common law concepts.

Explore related products

A Common Law for the Age of Statutes (Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures)

$52 $47.5

A Sketch of English Legal History: How Norman and Medieval Law, the Magna Carta, Common Law and Statute Law Was Created and Developed

$11.78

Common Law, Equity and Statute

$150.4

A Concise View of the Common and Statute Law of England 1781 Leather Bound

$32

Common Law Handbook: For Juror's, Sheriff's, Bailiff's, and Justice's

$5

A Treatise on the Common and Statute Law of the State of New York Relating to Insolvent Debtors: Including Article First, Second and Third of Title 1, ... Assignments for the Benefit of Credi

$42.27

Common law is based on precedent and previous decisions made by judges in similar cases

Common law, also known as "judge-made law", is a legal system that is based on precedent and previous decisions made by judges in similar cases. It is not traceable to written laws such as statutes, regulations, or the constitution. Common law is more malleable than statutory law, and it evolves over time as judges interpret and apply it to new situations. This evolution of common law is driven by judges, who have "made law" for hundreds of years. The reasons given for a decision are often more important in the long run than the outcome of a particular case, as these rationales and policies can be balanced with judgment in future cases.

Common law is based on the principle of "stare decisis et non quieta movere", which means "to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed". It involves a hierarchy of courts, where the decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts, but not vice versa. Judges are not bound by the decisions of other judges in their court. Common law operates as the primary source of law in many jurisdictions, and it is particularly prominent in English-speaking countries.

The process of determining common law for a particular case involves researching and analysing previous relevant cases, extracting statements and sentences, and then applying the relevant common law to the current case. This process can be complex and time-consuming, as it requires a deep understanding of judicial rulings. Common law is often contrasted with civil law, which is used in Quebec and has its origins in Roman law. While judges in civil law systems may refer to prior court decisions, their rulings are primarily based on the applicable code.

Common law is dynamic and flexible, allowing judges to respond to societal changes and developments. It provides independence to the judiciary and enables judges to interpret and apply the law based on the specific circumstances of each case. This flexibility can also be seen in the interaction between common law and statutory law. For example, statutory law can codify common law without displacing it, as seen in criminal law, which involves important common law concepts such as mens rea and natural justice.

Overall, common law is a vital component of the legal system, providing a foundation for judicial decision-making and enabling judges to interpret and apply the law in a flexible and dynamic manner. Its reliance on precedent and previous decisions made by judges in similar cases ensures consistency and fairness in the application of the law.

Explore related products

A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law: Including the Statutes and Judicial Decisions of all Jurisdictions of the United States

$39.95

A Common Law for the Age of Statutes

$78.1

Institutes of Common and Statute Law

$49.49

The Statute-Law Common-Plac'd: Or, a General Table to the Statutes

$45.45

Common Law – Civil Law: The Great Divide? (Law and Philosophy Library, 139)

$129.08 $179.99

Institutes of Common and Statute Law: (V. 4:Pt. 2) (1876-95)

$42.99

Statute law is based on current statutes (written laws) passed by various government agencies

Statute law, also known as civil law, is based on current statutes or written laws passed by various government agencies. These laws are created by legislative bodies such as Parliament and are often passed on a local, state, or federal level. In contrast, common law, or judge-made law, is based on past judicial opinions and precedents. It is important to note that common law and statutory law interact and can sometimes create confusion when they conflict. For example, in employment law, while statutory law may state a minimum standard, common law may require "reasonable notice", which can vary depending on the interpretation of the judge.

Statutory laws are developed by the government of a state or nation and are organized and codified into law codes. These laws are written down and easily accessible, making them more user-friendly than common law, which is often only accessible by reviewing judicial rulings. Statutory laws are also more rigid and strict in their application, leaving less room for interpretation. They are designed to be relevant and reasonable to the people they protect and regulate, and they can be changed or overturned if found to be unconstitutional.

Common law, on the other hand, is a more malleable and flexible system. It is based on the principle of "Stare decisis et non quieta movere", which means "to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed". This means that judges' rulings are based on previous decisions made in similar cases, creating a body of law that evolves over time. Common law gives independence to the judiciary and allows judges to respond to societal changes. While common law was the primary source of law for several hundred years, the increasing legislative powers of governments to create statutory law have led to a growing importance of statute law in common law countries.

The relationship between common law and statutory law is complex. While statutory law can codify common law without displacing it, common law often fills in the gaps where statutory law is silent. For example, in criminal law, statutory law may outline the criminal code, but common law concepts such as mens rea (the knowledge of wrongdoing) and natural justice (fairness in legal procedures) play a crucial role in determining criminal liability. This interplay between the two systems of law contributes to the dynamic and evolving nature of the legal system.

Explore related products

Institutes of Common and Statute Law Volume 1

$8.95 $22.68

A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition (The University Center for Human Values Series)

$18.49 $19.95

Elucidations Respecting the Common and Statute Law of Scotland

$28.95

The Common and Statute Law of England, Concerning Trials in High-Treason, Misprision of Treason, and in All Other Crimes and Offences Relating to the ... the Common and Statute Law-Books and Trials.

$43.43

Brown's Boundary Control and Legal Principles

$78.41 $160.95

Legal Nurse Consulting Principles and Practices

$152.01 $250

Common law is more malleable than statutory law

Common law, also known as "judge-made law", is a legal system that is based on precedent and past judicial opinions. It is a slow and incremental process of generating new common law, with judges making law by setting precedent in cases or following existing law by applying existing precedent. Common law is uncodified, meaning it is not compiled into rules and statutes, and instead relies on precedent. It is more malleable than statutory law, as it is based on the interpretation of existing law and the determination of new boundaries and distinctions. This allows judges to respond to what is happening in society and gives them the ability to make law.

Statutory law, on the other hand, is based on current statutes or written laws. It is created by legislative bodies and is subject to interpretation. While it can be overturned or changed if found to be unconstitutional, it is generally strict in its application. Statutory law is also more easily accessible than common law, which can be challenging to access as it requires a review of judicial rulings.

The relationship between common law and statutory law is complex, with both interacting and sometimes creating confusion when they offer different conclusions. For example, in the context of employment law, statutory law may outline a minimum standard, while common law provides a more flexible interpretation. In criminal law, statutory law may codify certain aspects, but it also incorporates important common law concepts such as mens rea and natural justice.

Common law has a long history, dating back to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. It operated as the primary source of law for several hundred years before the emergence of statutory law. The English Court of Common Pleas, established after the Magna Carta in 1215, played a significant role in the development of common law. Today, while statutory law may take precedence over common law in certain situations, common law remains a fundamental aspect of the legal system in many countries, particularly those with a common law tradition.

The malleability of common law allows for a more flexible and responsive legal system. Judges can interpret and apply the law based on the specific circumstances of a case, filling in gaps or clarifying boundaries where necessary. This adaptability is particularly important in addressing unique or evolving issues that may not be adequately covered by statutory law. However, it is important to note that while common law provides a degree of flexibility, it is also based on consistency and the principle of stare decisis, which means standing by past decisions and not disturbing settled matters.

Explore related products

Principles of Legal Research (Concise Hornbook Series)

$70 $70

Principles of Legal Research (Concise Hornbook Series)

$67.7

Brown's Boundary Control and Legal Principles

$160

Business Principles for Legal Nurse Consultants

$112.56 $190

Boundary Control and Legal Principles

$250

Business Law: Principles and Cases in the Legal Environment [Connected eBook with Study Center]

$130.46 $139

Common law and statutory law interact and can create complexity when precedent differs from legislation

Common law and statutory law are two essential components of the legal system, with different origins and applications. Common law, also known as "judge-made law", is based on past judicial opinions and precedent. It is uncodified, meaning it is not compiled into rules and statutes, and evolves gradually over time. On the other hand, statutory law is based on current statutes or written laws created by legislative bodies. It is codified and encompasses compiled legislation passed at various levels of government, such as local, state, or federal.

The interaction between common law and statutory law can create complexity, particularly when precedent differs from legislation. Common law is more malleable than statutory law, as it allows judges to respond to societal changes and interpret the law accordingly. In contrast, statutory law is strict in its application and is not subject to the same interpretation as common law. However, statutory law can codify common law without displacing it, as seen in criminal law, where concepts like mens rea and natural justice are important.

The distinction between common law and statutory law is not always clear-cut. For example, in the area of employment law, the Ontario Employment Standards Act (a statute) states that employers owe terminated employees one week of notice per year of service, up to eight weeks. However, under common law, employers must provide "reasonable notice", which is interpreted as a minimum of three months and can range up to two years. This discrepancy between the statute and common law can create confusion and complexity in legal proceedings.

Furthermore, the evolution of common law and the creation of statutory law by Parliament have led to an interplay between these two sources of law. While common law was the primary source of law for several hundred years, the acquisition of legislative powers by Parliament introduced statutory law. The interaction between these two sources of law can result in complexity, as noted by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who emphasised the gradual emergence of general principles in common and constitutional law from particularised prior decisions. This complexity arises when precedent decisions in common law offer different conclusions compared to the codified legislation of statutory law.

To manage this complexity, certain rules and hierarchies have been established. For instance, in most jurisdictions, decisions by appellate courts are binding on lower courts within the same jurisdiction, while decisions of lower courts are considered non-binding persuasive authority. Additionally, in the event of unique circumstances, a judge's decision can become the new law, taking precedence over previous common law or statutory law.

Explore related products

Legal Nurse Consulting Principles, 3rd Edition

$38.38 $120

The Wetiko Legal Principles: Cree and Anishinabek Responses to Violence and Victimization

$31.3 $32.95

Insurance Law: A Guide to Fundamental Principles, Legal Doctrines, and Commercial Practices (Hornbooks)

$116.25

Legal Issues in Special Education: Principles, Policies, and Practices

$39.19 $48.99

Principles of Legal Research, 2d (Concise Hornbook) (Concise Hornbook Series)

$45

Business Organization and Finance: Legal and Economic Principles, 11th Edition (Concepts and Insights)

$60 $60

Common law is also known as 'judge-made law' and is not traceable to written law

Common law, also known as "judge-made law", is a legal system that is not directly based on written laws created by legislative bodies. Instead, it is rooted in the precedents set by past judicial decisions and the interpretations made by judges in similar previous cases. This principle, known as "stare decisis" or "to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed", guides judges to rely on established rulings when deciding new cases.

Common law has a long history, dating back to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 and the establishment of the English Court of Common Pleas after the Magna Carta in 1215. For several hundred years, judge-made common law served as the primary source of law before the emergence of statutory law created by legislative bodies.

The evolution of common law is driven by judges, who have the power to interpret and apply legal principles to specific cases. This process involves researching and analysing previous relevant cases and extracting the applicable principles to inform their decisions. Over time, these judicial opinions and precedents accumulate, forming the body of common law.

The distinction between common law and statutory law lies in their origins and applications. While common law evolves through judicial interpretations and precedent, statutory law is based on written statutes enacted by legislative bodies such as Parliament. Statutory law is more rigid in its application, adhering strictly to the written laws, while common law allows for judicial discretion and interpretation.

Despite their differences, common law and statutory law interact and sometimes overlap. Statutory law can codify common law principles without displacing them, and common law may fill in gaps or clarify statutory provisions. For example, in criminal law, common law concepts like mens rea (the knowledge of wrongdoing) and natural justice (fairness in procedures) coexist with statutory laws.

Frequently asked questions