The Government's Abortion Payment Ban: What's The Law?

The Hyde Amendment, first passed in 1976, bans the use of federal funds for abortions in the United States. There are some exceptions to this law, such as when the pregnancy endangers the patient's life or results from rape or incest. The amendment has been altered several times since its inception, with the version in force from 1981 to 1993 prohibiting federal funds from being used for abortions unless the mother's life was in danger. The Hyde Amendment has been criticised for disproportionately affecting low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants, as an estimated 42% of abortion recipients live below the poverty line.

The Hyde Amendment

There are some exceptions to the Hyde Amendment, where federal funds can be used to pay for abortions. These include cases where the pregnant person's life is endangered, or where the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.

Federal abortion ban

On April 18, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the first federal law banning abortion procedures, known as the federal abortion ban. This law criminalizes abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy, which doctors often consider the safest and best way to protect a pregnant person's health. The Supreme Court's decision abandoned over 30 years of precedent that prioritized patients' health in laws restricting abortion access.

The federal abortion ban is one of the federal-level attacks on abortion access, including the Hyde Amendment and attempted 20-week bans. The Hyde Amendment, in place since 1976 (or 1977 according to another source), blocks federal Medicaid funding for abortion services with a few narrow exceptions. These exceptions include cases where continuing the pregnancy would endanger the patient's life or result from rape or incest. The Hyde Amendment interferes with individuals' private health decisions and disproportionately impacts low-income individuals, particularly Black, Indigenous, and other people of color.

The federal abortion ban and the Hyde Amendment both limit abortion access nationwide and have been criticized for allowing politicians to interfere in people's reproductive healthcare decisions. These restrictions affect not only patients but also healthcare professionals, who may be criminalized for providing constitutionally protected care.

While a majority of abortions in the U.S. occur during the first trimester, maintaining access to second-trimester abortions is crucial for those who need to end pregnancies for serious medical reasons. The federal abortion ban and other restrictions take away the ability of patients and doctors to make healthcare decisions together, infringing on individuals' rights to make their own personal medical decisions.

State abortion bans

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing individual states to ban abortion. As of February 2023, abortion is illegal in 13 states, with Texas, Missouri, and Kansas among them. Four U.S. states allow abortions only when necessary to save the life of the pregnant patient, while nine other states with bans also allow exceptions for serious health risks.

The Dobbs ruling has had a significant impact on emergency medicine, with physicians often caught between confusing laws and their duty to provide quality care. The Dobbs decision has also led to varied challenges for current providers, including treating patients who have had to continue risky pregnancies. The fallout from the decision extends beyond the immediate provision of pregnancy-related emergency care, with some emergency physicians expressing concerns about required abortion-related documentation and the impact of abortion restrictions on sensitive conversations with pregnant patients.

The Hyde Amendment, first passed in 1976, further complicates access to abortion services by banning the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, except in cases where the pregnancy endangers the life of the pregnant person or results from rape or incest. This amendment has been re-enacted annually, with some variations in exceptions, and has had a disproportionate impact on low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants.

In addition to the federal funding ban under the Hyde Amendment, some states have implemented their own restrictions on abortion funding. For example, South Dakota's Medicaid program does not cover abortion, even in cases of rape or incest. On the other hand, 17 states have policies to use their own Medicaid funds to pay for abortions beyond the Hyde Amendment requirements, and 16 states use their own funds to pay for elective abortions and similar services.

TRAP laws

In the United States, TRAP laws (Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers) are costly, severe, and medically unnecessary requirements imposed on abortion providers and women's health centers. These laws are often pushed by anti-abortion politicians under the guise of "women's health", with the real aim of shutting down abortion providers and making abortions more difficult to access.

Abortion has a 99% safety record, according to the CDC and other experts. Rebuilding a health centre to become an ASC is medically unnecessary and prohibitively expensive, involving specifications for hallway width, complex HVAC systems, operating room dimensions, and janitor's closets. These restrictions result in fewer providers and increased difficulty in accessing abortions.

Similarly, there is no medical basis for the requirement that abortion providers obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals. Abortion providers already have plans in place to ensure patient safety in rare emergency cases. Given the safety of abortion procedures, doctors rarely admit patients to hospitals, which can make it challenging or impossible for them to obtain admitting privileges. Furthermore, if the only local hospital is hostile to abortion access due to religious affiliation or political pressure, this requirement can create a catch-22 situation.

In summary, TRAP laws have had a detrimental impact on access to safe and legal abortions in the United States. They have led to the closure of health centres, delayed abortion care, and made it more difficult for people, especially those with low incomes, to obtain abortions.

Waiting periods

As of August 30, 2023, 33 states required patients to receive counselling before an abortion is performed. Of these, 29 states detail the information that providers must give, while 4 states have abortion-specific requirements that generally follow the established principles of informed consent. Informed consent requires that patients possess the capacity to make decisions about their care, that their participation is voluntary, and that they are provided with adequate and appropriate information. However, abortion counselling requirements sometimes conflict with these principles by mandating information that is irrelevant or misleading.

Twenty-eight states require patients to wait a specified amount of time, typically 24 hours, between the counselling and the abortion procedure. Sixteen states require that counselling be provided in person, necessitating two separate trips to the facility. This can be particularly challenging for people with low incomes, who may not have the resources to make multiple trips to a clinic.

In addition to the mandatory waiting periods, some states also mandate when and how an ultrasound is performed prior to an abortion. These requirements can further delay access to abortion services and increase the financial and logistical burdens on patients.

The waiting periods and counselling requirements are part of a broader effort to restrict access to abortion at the state level. Other measures include restricting insurance coverage, enacting targeted restrictions against abortion providers, implementing mandatory ultrasounds and biased counselling, and imposing so-called "personhood" measures. These measures have been criticised for interfering with people's access to safe and legal abortion and for taking away their right to make personal medical decisions.

Frequently asked questions