Abortion Funding: Legal Obstacles And Taxpayer Dollars

The Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision that bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortions in the United States. The amendment was first passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted every year since, with several alterations to the exceptions made over time. The Hyde Amendment does not cover cases where the woman's life is endangered, or in instances of rape or incest.

The amendment has been the subject of much debate, with critics arguing that it disproportionately affects low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants. In 2021, 16 states used their own state funds to pay for elective abortions and similar services, exceeding federal requirements.

The Hyde Amendment

Since its introduction, the Hyde Amendment has been altered several times. In 1981, a new version of the amendment came into force, which expanded the category of abortions eligible for federal funding under Medicaid to include cases of rape and incest. This version remained in force until 1993, when it was altered once more to include only the original exception of protecting the life of the mother.

The amendment has had a significant impact on abortion coverage for women enrolled in federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as Native American women, U.S. servicewomen, veterans, women in the Peace Corps, federal employee families, and women in detention facilities and prisons. While the Hyde Amendment restricts the use of federal funds for abortions, it does not prevent women from paying for the procedure out of pocket.

In recent years, there have been efforts to repeal or modify the Hyde Amendment. In 2016, Hillary Clinton advocated for its repeal during her presidential campaign, and in 2020, Joe Biden reversed his previous support of the amendment and pledged to work towards overturning it. Despite these efforts, the Hyde Amendment continues to shape abortion policy and funding in the United States.

Federal funding for abortions in the case of rape, incest, or life endangerment

The Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or life endangerment. The amendment was first passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted every year since, with some exceptions. For example, the 1978 Amendment presented new exceptions for rape survivors and incest cases. The current version of the Hyde Amendment, in effect since 1997, bans federal funding for abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or where a woman's life is threatened by a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.

The Stupak-Pitts Amendment, an amendment to the Affordable Health Care for America Act, prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions or for health coverage that includes abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, introduced in 2013 and 2021, would prohibit federal funding of abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger. The act would also disallow the application of certain health coverage tax benefits to coverage of abortion services, except under the excepted circumstances mentioned above.

The Helms Amendment, passed in 1973, bans the use of US foreign assistance to pay for the "performance of abortion as a method of family planning."

State funding for abortions

In the United States, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape. The Hyde Amendment was first passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted every year since, with varying exceptions.

The Amendment has guided public funding for abortions under the joint federal-state Medicaid programs for low-income people. While most states meet the requirements, one state is in violation of federal Medicaid law as it pays for abortions only in cases of life endangerment. As of 2021, 16 states use their own state funds to pay for elective abortions and similar services, exceeding federal requirements.

As of August 2023, 32 states and the District of Columbia follow the federal standard and provide abortions in cases of life endangerment, rape, and incest. Four of these states also provide state funds for abortions in cases of fetal impairment, and four provide state funds for abortions necessary to prevent grave, long-lasting damage to the person's physical health. One state provides abortions only in cases of life endangerment, in apparent violation of the federal standard.

In 2021, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act was introduced. This bill prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions or for health coverage that includes abortions. It also prohibits qualified health plans from including coverage for abortions.

Taxpayer funding for abortions via insurance

In the United States, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision that bars federal funds from being used to pay for abortions, except when the pregnancy poses a risk to the life of the woman, or is a result of incest or rape. The amendment was first passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted every year since, with some changes to the exceptions over time. The Hyde Amendment has influenced other bans, extending to women in federal prisons, the military, and international family planning programs.

The amendment has had a significant impact on Medicaid, a state and federal health program for low-income individuals. While some states use their own funds to pay for abortions for women on Medicaid, many do not. This has resulted in a lack of access to abortion services for many individuals, particularly those with low incomes, women of color, and those with Medicaid coverage.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2021 is a bill that aims to modify provisions relating to federal funding for, and health insurance coverage of, abortions. The bill prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions or health coverage that includes abortions, including in the District of Columbia. It also prohibits abortions from being provided in federal health care facilities or by federal employees.

The bill extends the restrictions of the Hyde Amendment to all federal funds, rather than specific agencies, and makes these restrictions permanent. It includes exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or where a physical disorder, injury, or illness endangers a woman's life.

The bill also prohibits qualified health plans from including coverage for abortions. Currently, while qualified health plans may cover abortion, the portion of the premium attributable to abortion coverage is not eligible for subsidies.

Taxpayer funding for abortions via tax credits

In the United States, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision that bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape. The amendment was passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted every year since, with some changes to the exceptions.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act is a bill that seeks to amend Title 1 of the United States Code to prohibit the use of federal funds for abortions or for health coverage that includes abortions. The bill also prohibits qualified health plans from including coverage for abortions. The bill was introduced in 2021 and referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.

The Hyde Amendment has been criticised for disproportionately affecting low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants, as an estimated 42% of abortion recipients live below the poverty line.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act has been supported by many senators, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who argue that it would simplify federal rules and ensure that American tax dollars are not used for abortions. However, the bill has also faced opposition, with some arguing that it is an aggressive assault on women's health and the constitutionally protected right to decide whether to carry a pregnancy to term.

The debate around taxpayer funding for abortions remains contentious, with strong arguments on both sides.

Frequently asked questions