Trump Jr.'S Legal Troubles: Which Laws Were Broken?

In 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, after being promised compromising information on Hillary Clinton. This marked a departure from the norm as it involved a meeting between a political campaign and a foreign national. The New York Times reported that Trump Jr. was aware of the potential for collusion with Russian officials, as he wrote in an email: If it's what you say I love it, especially later in the summer. This incident has raised questions about whether Trump Jr. broke the law, with Congress and the FBI investigating potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials in the 2016 election.

Did Donald Trump Jr. break the law by meeting with a Russian lawyer?

In 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer who had offered to provide incriminating information about Hillary Clinton as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump". Trump Jr. replied, "If it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer." This meeting, along with the preceding emails, has led to accusations of breaking the law and colluding with Russia.

While collusion is not a specific crime, federal law prohibits foreign governments from making contributions to US political campaigns, including "anything of value" in connection with the campaign. Some legal experts believe that the hacked Podesta emails, transmitted to WikiLeaks, constituted "anything of value", and that the coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian agents could violate other laws. For example, it is illegal to solicit contributions from foreign nationals, regardless of whether the contribution is delivered.

However, other legal experts disagree, arguing that opposition research would not qualify as something "of value" under the law, as it is not a tangible thing like money or gifts. They also point out that the meeting did not yield anything of value for the Trump campaign.

The controversy surrounding Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian lawyer highlights the complexity of interpreting and applying the law in this case. While some argue that he broke the law, others disagree, showcasing the differing legal interpretations and the ongoing debate surrounding the issue.

Did he collude with Russian officials to meddle in the 2016 election?

In June 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met with Kremlin-linked lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower. This meeting has been the subject of controversy and investigation, with Special Counsel Robert Mueller probing it as part of his inquiry into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Trump Jr. initially stated that the meeting primarily discussed a suspended programme for Americans to adopt Russian children. However, he later admitted that he agreed to the meeting as he was promised information detrimental to Hillary Clinton, his father's opponent in the 2016 election. This information was described as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr Trump".

Legal experts argue that Trump Jr.'s conduct may have violated campaign finance laws, which prohibit accepting anything of value from foreign governments or nationals. His eagerness to obtain damaging information about Clinton could also potentially breach conspiracy laws. Some analysts assert that by holding the meeting, Trump Jr. broke the law, while others contend that the lack of evidence regarding the exchange of information makes the legal implications unclear.

The Trump team, including one of Trump's lawyers, Jay Sekulow, has denied any law-breaking, challenging critics to identify a specific statute or rule that was violated. They also emphasise that the meeting did not yield any meaningful information about Clinton.

What was the content of the email exchange with the Russian lawyer?

On June 9, 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, Jared Kushner, and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. The meeting was set up after the campaign was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

In the email exchange that set up the meeting, Trump Jr. was told that Veselnitskaya had "official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father". The email also mentioned that the information was "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr Trump". Trump Jr. responded that he would "love" to receive the information, and that it would be "especially sensitive" given the political climate at the time.

Veselnitskaya has claimed that during the meeting, Trump Jr. indicated that his father would reconsider laws sanctioning Russia if he won the presidency. She also claimed that Trump Jr. asked her for written evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign received ill-gotten proceeds. Trump Jr. has described the meeting as a waste of time, as Veselnitskaya did not provide any useful information.

What was discussed in the meeting with the Russian lawyer?

On June 9, 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower in New York City. The meeting was also attended by Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law; Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager; publicist Rob Goldstone; and four other U.S. citizens. The meeting was arranged by Goldstone, a long-time Trump acquaintance, on behalf of his client, Russian singer-songwriter Emin Agalarov.

In the lead-up to the meeting, Goldstone emailed Trump Jr. to offer a meeting with a Russian lawyer who would provide incriminating information about Hillary Clinton as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump." Trump Jr. responded enthusiastically, saying, "I love it."

However, in the aftermath of the meeting, Trump Jr. made several misleading statements about its purpose. He initially told reporters that the meeting was about the adoption of Russian children by American families. Later, he acknowledged that he had agreed to the meeting because he expected to receive information damaging to the Clinton campaign, but he claimed that none was presented and that the conversation focused on the Magnitsky Act instead.

Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer involved, has denied having any connection to the Russian government or possessing any damaging information about Clinton. She claimed that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss U.S. sanctions on Russia and provide allegations about a firm connected to financier William Browder, who lobbied for the Magnitsky Act.

The meeting has sparked intense debate and legal scrutiny, with questions arising about potential violations of campaign finance laws and conspiracy statutes. Some legal experts argue that Trump Jr.'s conduct may have breached federal campaign finance law, which prohibits soliciting or accepting "anything of value" from foreign nationals in connection with a political campaign. In this context, "anything of value" could be interpreted to include opposition research or damaging information about a political opponent. However, other legal scholars disagree, arguing that such information does not fall under the scope of the law's definition of a "contribution" or "donation."

The meeting is being investigated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller as part of his broader inquiry into Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and potential collusion with the Trump campaign.

What was the motivation for taking the meeting?

The motivation for Donald Trump Jr. to take the meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was the prospect of obtaining damaging information on Hillary Clinton, Trump's opponent in the 2016 presidential election. The New York Times reported that Trump Jr. was told he would receive "compromising information" on Clinton if he met with Veselnitskaya. In an email response to the meeting offer, Trump Jr. wrote, "If it's what you say I love it, especially later in the summer."

This meeting marked a notable departure from the norm, as it involved a member of a political campaign meeting with a foreign national. Veselnitskaya had strong ties to the Kremlin and was known for her campaign against the 2012 Magnitsky Act, which blacklisted Russians suspected of human rights abuses. She was also married to a former deputy transportation minister of the Moscow region, and her clients included Russian state-owned businesses.

Trump Jr.'s interest in the meeting was implied in his statement to The Times, where he said that it became clear that the "claims of potentially helpful information were a pretext for the meeting." He also stated that the woman at the meeting, Veselnitskaya, had mentioned that "individuals connected to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Ms. Clinton." However, he claimed that her statements were "vague, ambiguous, and made no sense," and that she provided no details or supporting information.

The meeting, arranged by Trump Jr., was also attended by his brother-in-law, Jared Kushner, and the Trump campaign's chairman at the time, Paul Manafort. This gathering marked the first confirmed meeting between a Russian citizen and the Trump campaign. The revelation of this meeting sparked further investigations by Congress and the FBI into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 election.

Frequently asked questions