Joe Arpagio: Lawbreaker Or Political Prisoner?

Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, was convicted of criminal contempt of court in 2017 for disobeying a judge's order in a racial profiling case. Arpaio, who was an outspoken opponent of illegal immigration, was found to have racially profiled Latinos in his traffic patrols and immigration sweeps. Despite warnings and a court order to stop these practices, Arpaio refused to comply and continued to target and detain Latinos without reasonable suspicion or charges. This led to him being charged with criminal contempt of court and subsequently pardoned by President Donald Trump.

Joe Arpaio's racial profiling of Latinos

Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Arizona's Maricopa County, was known for his aggressive and racially-charged tactics against Latinos. Arpaio's signature traffic patrol policy targeted Latino immigrants, leading to court-ordered overhauls of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office's traffic operations and internal affairs department.

In 2013, a federal judge ruled that the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office had profiled Latinos in Arpaio's traffic patrols, marking a significant milestone in the fight against racial profiling in the county. This decision resulted in extensive court-ordered reforms and a hefty financial burden on Maricopa County residents, with costs expected to reach $273 million by the summer of 2024.

Arpaio's racial profiling practices extended beyond traffic patrols. He was also known for his brutal treatment of inmates, particularly Latinos. He referred to his "Tent City" jail as a "concentration camp," where inmates endured harsh conditions, including extreme temperatures, inadequate meals, and being forced to wear pink underwear. Arpaio's obsession with immigration and his aggressive tactics led to numerous lawsuits and a criminal conviction for contempt of court.

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) also found that Arpaio's office committed a wide range of civil rights violations against Latinos, including racial profiling and discrimination. The DOJ's investigation concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in US history, with Latino drivers four to nine times more likely to be stopped than non-Latino drivers.

Arpaio's actions caused a financial strain on Maricopa County, with compliance costs expected to exceed $314 million by mid-summer 2025. Despite the significant costs and criticism, Arpaio stood by his actions and showed no remorse, even receiving a pardon from President Donald Trump for his criminal contempt of court conviction.

Arpaio's defiance of court orders

Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, was found guilty of criminal contempt of court for defying a judge's order to stop his enforcement of federal immigration laws. Arpaio was convicted of misdemeanor contempt of court for ignoring a 2011 court order to stop traffic patrols that targeted immigrants, amounting to racial profiling.

Arpaio's defense lawyers argued that he relied on the advice of a former attorney who failed to explain the importance of the court order adequately. They also claimed that there were weaknesses in the court order that did not acknowledge when deputies would detain immigrants and hand them over to federal authorities. However, prosecutors refuted these claims by citing Arpaio's own words against him, including news releases and TV interviews where he stated his office would continue to enforce immigration laws.

Arpaio's immigration powers were eventually stripped away by the courts and the federal government, with a judge ruling in 2013 that his officers racially profiled Latinos. The contempt-of-court case marked the first time federal authorities prosecuted Arpaio on a criminal charge, despite previous investigations into his conduct.

Misuse of funds and high legal bills

Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, has been accused of several types of police misconduct, including misuse of funds and abuse of power. Arpaio was accused of misusing funds from the sales of pink boxers, which were introduced as part of his public relations strategy. Arpaio declined to provide an accounting for the money, despite allegations of misuse of funds.

An analysis by the Maricopa County Office of Management and Budget found that Arpaio had misspent almost $100 million over five years. The analysis showed that Arpaio used money from a restricted detention fund, which could only be used for jail items and detention officer salaries, to pay employees to patrol Maricopa County. The investigation also revealed that Arpaio's office kept a separate set of personnel books, which detailed work assignments that differed from the information kept in the county's official human resources records.

In addition, Arpaio used the detention fund to pay for investigations of political rivals and activities involving his human-smuggling unit. The analysis also uncovered inappropriate spending on trips to Alaska and Disneyland, as well as stays at luxury hotels and expensive meals charged to county credit cards.

Separate investigations by The Arizona Republic revealed widespread abuse of public funds and county policies by Arpaio's office. It was found that restricted jail-enhancement funds were improperly used to pay for out-of-state training, a staff party, and the purchase of a $456,000 bus in violation of county procurement rules.

Furthermore, Arpaio was accused of misusing funds to pay for his legal defense. A nonprofit organization, the National Center for Police Defense (NCPD), solicited tax-deductible donations specifically for Arpaio's legal defense fund. The legitimacy of this organization was questioned, as it appeared to have been founded just as Arpaio's legal troubles began to surface.

Botched investigations of sex crimes

Joe Arpaio, the self-proclaimed "America's Toughest Sheriff", was accused of botching the investigation into the rape of a 13-year-old girl, Sabrina Morrison, and failing to arrest the suspect, Patrick Morrison, who went on to sexually assault her again.

Sabrina Morrison, who suffered from a mental disability, was raped by her uncle, Patrick Morrison, on March 7, 2007. The next day, she told her teacher, who called the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO). A rape kit was taken, but the detective assigned to the case told Sabrina and her family that there were no obvious signs of sexual assault, no semen, or signs of trauma. As a result, Sabrina was branded a liar by her family. Her uncle continued to rape her repeatedly, threatening to kill her if she told anyone. She became pregnant and had an abortion.

Unbeknownst to the family, the rape kit had been tested at a state lab and showed the presence of semen. The lab requested that the detective obtain a blood sample from the suspect, Patrick Morrison. Instead of obtaining the blood sample, or making an arrest, the detective filed the crime lab note and closed the case for four years.

In September 2011, the sheriff's office finally obtained a blood sample from Patrick Morrison, which matched the semen taken over four years earlier. Patrick Morrison was arrested and charged in February 2012. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 years in prison.

An internal review attributed the failures in the Morrison case and over 400 other sex crimes investigated by the MCSO during a three-year period ending in 2007 to understaffing and mismanagement. According to a memo written by a detective assigned to the Morrison case, fraud investigations took precedence over sex crimes, and resources were diverted to implement Arpaio's racial-profiling sweeps and to gin up criminal cases against the sheriff's political enemies.

In August 2012, Sabrina Morrison filed a notice of claim against Arpaio and Maricopa County for gross negligence, and in April 2015, the case was settled for $3.5 million.

Immigration crackdowns

Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, gained notoriety for his hardline stance on immigration. Arpaio's immigration crackdowns, which began in 2005, involved saturation patrols and immigration sweeps, targeting Latino neighbourhoods and day labourers. He also ran operations targeting businesses that employed Latinos, arresting employees who were unauthorised immigrants for identity theft.

Arpaio's immigration enforcement practices were ruled unlawful by US District Judge G. Murray Snow in 2013, who found that they amounted to racial profiling and violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Despite this, Arpaio continued his immigration patrols and was subsequently found in civil contempt of court. In 2017, he was convicted of criminal contempt of court for willfully disobeying a court order to stop his discriminatory practices.

Arpaio's immigration crackdowns were a significant factor in his political downfall. In 2016, he lost his bid for re-election as Maricopa County Sheriff, and his failed attempts to regain political office in subsequent years were hampered by his conviction and the controversy surrounding it.

Frequently asked questions