Lori Loughlin's Legal Troubles: Understanding The Charges

what law did laurie loughlin break

In 2019, Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail and wire fraud. They were also charged with fraud and money laundering for paying $500,000 to have their daughters accepted to the University of Southern California as crew recruits, despite neither of them participating in the sport. Loughlin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and served two months in prison.

Characteristics Values
Nature of the crime Fraud, bribery, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, honest services fraud
Parties involved Two or more people
Victims Society
Plea Not guilty
Sentence 2 months in prison, $150,000 fine, 2 years of supervised release, 100 hours of community service

lawshun

Conspiracy to commit mail fraud

To be charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud, several elements must be present. Firstly, there must be an agreement between two or more people to commit mail fraud. This agreement can be expressed directly or implied indirectly and does not need to be formal. Secondly, each participant must have the intent to commit mail fraud and must knowingly and willingly join the conspiracy, understanding its objectives. Lastly, an overt act must be taken in furtherance of the conspiracy, such as purchasing supplies or initiating communications related to the criminal activity.

The consequences of being found guilty of conspiracy to commit mail fraud can be severe. In the case of Lori Loughlin, she faced the possibility of up to 40 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines if found guilty. While she initially pleaded not guilty, she eventually broke down and realized the severity of her situation.

It is important to note that conspiracy to commit mail fraud is a complex legal matter, and the specific laws and penalties may vary depending on the jurisdiction. It is always advisable to seek legal guidance and consult with an experienced attorney to understand your rights and navigate the legal complexities.

When is Civil Disobedience Justified?

You may want to see also

lawshun

Honest services fraud

In 1988, the United States Congress added Section 1346 to the federal mail and wire fraud statute, defining what is referred to as "honest services fraud". This law was intended to criminalize not only schemes to defraud victims of money and property but also schemes to defraud victims of intangible rights, such as the "honest services" of a public official.

To convict an individual of honest services fraud, prosecutors must prove four critical elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • There was a "scheme or artifice" in existence designed to defraud others (e.g., giving someone an unfair advantage over someone else);
  • The individual willfully participated in this scheme to defraud, whether by offering or accepting a bribe or kickback;
  • The scheme had the potential to cause harm to others by depriving them of tangible or intangible "honest services," even if it ultimately did not do so; and
  • The scheme used mail or wire services, including telephone or Internet.

In the case of Lori Loughlin, she was accused of paying bribes totaling $500,000 to have her two daughters designated as recruits to the USC crew team, despite the fact that they did not participate in crew, thereby facilitating their admission to the university. Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, pleaded not guilty to charges of honest services fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, and money laundering. They faced the possibility of decades in prison and millions in fines if found guilty.

Devin Nunes: Lawbreaker or Innocent?

You may want to see also

lawshun

Money laundering

The couple initially pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming they were under the impression they were breaking rules, not laws. They believed their payments would be used as donations to benefit the school. However, they later pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges related to the scandal and served prison time.

Biden's Ukraine: Legal or Illegal?

You may want to see also

lawshun

Conspiracy to commit wire fraud

Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were accused of paying $500,000 to Rick Singer and the Key Worldwide Foundation to falsely designate their daughters as recruits to the University of Southern California crew team, despite neither daughter ever having participated in the sport. This scheme involved the use of wire communications, such as emails and telephone calls, to transmit the fraudulent information and facilitate the conspiracy.

The specific elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud include the intent to defraud, the use of wire communications to further the scheme, and the actual transmission of information through wire communications. In the case of Loughlin and Giannulli, they allegedly communicated with Singer via email and telephone to discuss the scheme and transmit false information to the university.

The consequences of conspiracy to commit wire fraud are severe. Loughlin faced up to 20 years in prison for the conspiracy charge alone. Ultimately, she pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and served a two-month prison sentence, in addition to paying a fine and completing community service hours.

It is important to note that conspiracy charges can be complex, as they involve an agreement between multiple parties to commit a fraudulent act. In this case, Loughlin and Giannulli were not the only conspirators; they were part of a larger scheme involving other parents, coaches, and university officials. The use of wire communications to transmit fraudulent information is what elevates a conspiracy charge to one of wire fraud, which carries more severe penalties.

lawshun

Bribery

In 2019, Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail and wire fraud. They were also charged with fraud and money laundering. These charges were related to their alleged involvement in a college admissions scandal, known as Operation Varsity Blues, in which they were accused of bribing university officials to secure admission for their daughters at the University of Southern California (USC).

Specifically, Loughlin and Giannulli were accused of paying $500,000 to admissions consultant William "Rick" Singer, the mastermind of the scheme, to designate their daughters as recruits to the USC crew team, despite neither of them being athletes. They allegedly posed their daughters on rowing machines for photos to be submitted with their application and provided false athletic résumés detailing achievements in crew.

Loughlin and Giannulli initially pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming that they were under the impression they might be breaking rules but not laws and that they were manipulated by those involved. However, in May 2020, they pleaded guilty to the charges. As a result, Loughlin was sentenced to two months in prison and a $150,000 fine, while Giannulli received five months in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Face Masks: A Matter of Law and Order?

You may want to see also

Frequently asked questions

Lori Loughlin was charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail and wire fraud. She was also charged with fraud and money laundering.

Operation Varsity Blues was a nationwide FBI investigation into William "Rick" Singer, who was paid large sums of money to fraudulently inflate children's test scores and bribe college officials to gain them admission.

Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were accused of paying $500,000 to admissions consultant William "Rick" Singer to designate their daughters, Olivia and Isabella, as recruits to the USC crew team, despite neither of them being athletes.

In May 2020, Lori Loughlin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. She was sentenced to two months in prison and was released in December 2020.

The scandal attracted significant media attention, with some sources reporting that Lori Loughlin was starting to understand the severity of the charges she was facing. It also sparked a broader conversation about the role of wealth and privilege in the college admissions process.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment