Trump's Arlington Cemetery Visit: What Laws Were Broken?

In August 2024, former US President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony honouring the 13 service members killed during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. However, controversy arose when Trump's campaign aides were seen shooting photos and videos in Section 60 of the cemetery, a location dedicated to fallen soldiers of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. This incident sparked debates about the legality and ethics of political actions in a solemn and sacred space. According to sources, Trump's staff were informed multiple times that filming in this area was prohibited, but they proceeded anyway, resulting in a physical altercation with a cemetery official, who was pushed aside. While the employee decided not to press charges, this event raised questions about the potential violation of federal law and the implications for political campaigns in sacred spaces.

Verbal abuse and physical assault of a cemetery official

In August 2024, former US President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate the 13 US service members killed during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. This visit sparked controversy as it was seen as a campaign event, with Trump seeking to highlight the Biden administration's chaotic withdrawal and attach it to Vice President Kamala Harris.

The incident in question involves a verbal and physical altercation between Trump's campaign staff and an official at the cemetery. The cemetery official tried to prevent Trump's staff from filming and photographing in Section 60, an area dedicated to fallen soldiers of recent US conflicts, where such activities are prohibited. Despite warnings, Trump's staff proceeded, resulting in a confrontation.

During the altercation, Trump's campaign staff verbally abused and pushed the cemetery official aside. The official was abruptly pushed aside and treated for minor injuries at a nearby hospital. The Army stated that the employee was ensuring that participants in the ceremony followed the rules and considered the matter closed as the official declined to press charges.

The relevant law regarding this incident is 32 CFR § 553.33 (c) (16), which prohibits "disrespectful or disorderly conduct within an Army National Military Cemetery." Additionally, 18 U.S. Code § 111 addresses assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees. While the cemetery official did not press charges, the Army filed a report, and the incident sparked discussions about the need for clearer regulations to protect the sanctity of military cemeteries.

The ethical implications of the incident are also significant. Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place of profound national importance, and the use of such a space for political purposes can be seen as a breach of its sanctity. The involvement of a political campaign in activities at the cemetery crosses a line for many, and the memory of the fallen should not be used for political gain.

Violation of 32 CFR § 553.32

The 32 CFR § 553.32 law states that the Executive Director of the Army National Military Cemeteries shall "ensure the sanctity of public and private memorial and ceremonial events".

The law also states that all memorial services and ceremonies within Army National Military Cemeteries, other than official ceremonies, shall be "purely memorial in purpose" and "will not include partisan political activities".

In August 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Trump was accompanied by Vice President-elect JD Vance.

Trump's visit was controversial because it was seen as a campaign event, with Trump seeking to highlight the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan and attach it to Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump's team also shared images from the visit in a "very campaign-oriented way".

Arlington National Cemetery released a statement saying that federal law "prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate's campaign". The statement added that the cemetery had "widely shared this law and its prohibitions with all participants".

Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery, particularly the filming and photography of the event by his campaign staff, was thus seen as a potential violation of the 32 CFR § 553.32 law, which prohibits partisan political activities at memorial services and ceremonies within Army National Military Cemeteries.

In addition to the potential violation of this law, there was also an altercation between Trump's campaign staff and an official at the cemetery, who tried to prevent them from filming and photographing in a restricted section. The cemetery official was "abruptly pushed aside" and the incident was reported to the police. However, the employee decided not to press charges, and the Army considered the matter closed.

Violation of 32 CFR § 553.33 (c) (16)

On August 26, 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony honouring the 13 service members killed during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. Trump was accompanied by Vice President-elect JD Vance, and the two placed wreaths at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Trump's motorcade then headed to Section 60 of the cemetery, a burial site for military personnel killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Section 60 is considered hallowed ground in the military, and federal law and Pentagon policies prohibit political activities in this area. However, Trump's campaign aides were seen taking photos and videos in this section, which were later used in campaign advertisements. Despite being informed multiple times that filming in Section 60 was prohibited, the campaign aides proceeded, leading to a physical altercation with a cemetery official who tried to prevent them from entering.

The relevant law that was broken during this incident is 32 CFR § 553.33 (c) (16), which prohibits engaging in any "disrespectful or disorderly conduct within an Army National Military Cemetery." This includes partisan political activities, such as those conducted by the Trump campaign. The law grants cemeteries the authority to establish rules for visitors, including barring activities like campaign photography if they are deemed to support partisan political activities.

The controversy surrounding this incident sparked ethical concerns about the use of a sacred space for political purposes, blurring the lines between honouring the fallen and advancing a political agenda. The incident also raised fears among officials and experts that Trump could use the military for political purposes if he were to win another term in office. While the cemetery official decided not to press charges, the Army defended the employee and filed a report on the matter.

The full extent of the legal and political repercussions of this incident remains unclear, as the law does not specify criminal penalties for such violations. However, it has sparked discussions on the need for clearer regulations to protect the sanctity of military cemeteries from political exploitation.

Defamation of a cemetery official

In August 2024, former US President Donald Trump and his staff were involved in an altercation with an official at Arlington National Cemetery during a wreath-laying ceremony. The cemetery official was "abruptly pushed aside" by Trump's staff and his campaign team. The official was trying to ensure that those participating in the ceremony were following the rules.

The incident was reported to the police, but the cemetery employee decided not to press charges, and the Army considered the matter closed. However, this incident sparked discussions about whether Trump and his team broke any laws during their visit to the cemetery.

Defamation Claims

One of the legal issues that arose from this incident was a potential defamation claim by the cemetery official against Trump's campaign staff. Defamation is a legal claim that someone has made false statements about another person, causing damage to their reputation. In this case, after the incident, a member of Trump's campaign staff made a statement to the press, alleging that the cemetery official was "clearly having a mental health emergency." This statement was considered defamatory because it was allegedly false and could harm the official's reputation.

To prove defamation, the cemetery official would have to show that the statement made by Trump's campaign staff was false and caused harm to their reputation. Additionally, they would need to demonstrate that the statement was published, either in writing or verbally, to a third party.

In this case, the statement was published to the press and widely disseminated, potentially satisfying the publication requirement. However, the cemetery official declined to press charges, citing fears of reprisals from Trump's supporters. While this is understandable, it could impact the official's ability to pursue legal action.

Other Potential Claims

In addition to defamation, the cemetery official may have had potential claims for assault and battery against Trump's staff. Assault is causing someone to fear immediate physical harm, while battery is the actual physical contact. In this case, the physical pushing of the official by Trump's staff could constitute assault and battery.

Furthermore, the incident also brought up questions about the legality of Trump's visit to the cemetery for political purposes. There are laws prohibiting the use of Army National Military Cemeteries for partisan political activities, and Trump's visit was considered a campaign event by some experts.

While the cemetery official chose not to pursue legal action, the incident highlights the potential legal consequences of such actions and the importance of respecting the rules and dignity of sacred places like Arlington National Cemetery.

Violation of the Hatch Act

The Hatch Act prohibits the use of federal government facilities for political purposes. In August 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony honouring the 13 service members killed during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. Trump also visited Section 60 of the cemetery, where troops who died in Iraq and Afghanistan are buried. This section is considered hallowed ground in the military.

Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery was accompanied by campaign aides and had a clear political intent. The Trump campaign had been actively highlighting the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the imagery from the cemetery was shared in a manner that supported Trump's political narrative. The use of such a sacred space for political purposes can be seen as a breach of the cemetery's sanctity.

Trump's campaign aides were seen shooting photos and videos in Section 60, despite being informed multiple times that filming in this area was prohibited. The relevant legal framework here is 32 CFR § 553.32, which mandates that the executive director of the Army National Military Cemeteries ensures the sanctity of public and private memorial and ceremonial events. The law specifically states that all memorial services and ceremonies within Army National Military Cemeteries must be purely memorial in purpose and must not include partisan political activities.

The filming and photography conducted by Trump's campaign staff in Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, a restricted area, can be considered a violation of the Hatch Act. This is because the use of federal government facilities, such as military cemeteries, for political purposes is prohibited by the Act. The political nature of the visit was evident, and the imagery captured was used to support Trump's political narrative.

In addition to the potential violation of the Hatch Act, there was also a physical altercation between Trump's campaign staff and a cemetery official who tried to prevent them from filming and photographing in Section 60. The cemetery official was "abruptly pushed aside" and verbally abused by Trump's staff. The Army defended the employee, stating that she acted professionally and was unfairly attacked. While the employee did not press charges, the cemetery filed a report on the matter.

The full extent of the legal and political repercussions of this incident remains unclear. However, it has sparked a debate about the need for clearer regulations and enforcement mechanisms to protect the sanctity of military cemeteries from political exploitation. The controversy may also impact public perception, particularly among those who view Arlington National Cemetery as a symbol of national unity and reverence.

Frequently asked questions