Cecily Zamora
Hillary Clinton's use of a private server in her home to transact government business, as well as her use of portable electronic devices for the same purpose, has raised questions about whether she broke the law. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. While Clinton's potential legal liability for her actions may be minimal, some have argued that she broke several laws and committed violations in connection with her mishandling of official documents. One theory suggests that Clinton could face the same criminal charge as CIA Director General David Petraeus, who improperly shared classified information with his biographer. Notably, the information doesn't necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Using a private server and portable electronic devices | To transact government business |
| Destroying 33,000 emails and devices | After being subpoenaed to preserve them |
| Improperly sharing classified information | With her biographer |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
Mishandling of official documents
Hillary Clinton has been accused of mishandling official documents. She installed and used a private server in her home to transact Government business, as well as using a number of portable electronic devices for the same purpose. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be obliterated and all of the portable devices to be destroyed.
Clinton's actions may have violated a number of federal statutes, including conspiracy, false statements, money laundering, obstruction, perjury, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and tax evasion. The specific statute that she may have violated is the one that prohibits the improper sharing of classified information. Notably, the information doesn't necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute.
Clinton's potential legal liability for her actions may be minimal, but the political ramifications could be significant. Her actions have raised questions about her fitness for office and have led to calls for prosecution. However, direct intervention from President Obama and/or Attorney General Loretta Lynch prevented that from happening.
On 9/2/2016, the FBI released its report after interviewing Clinton regarding the violations that she committed in connection with her mishandling of official documents. The report found that Clinton had, in fact, mishandled official documents and may have violated federal statutes. The report also noted that Clinton's actions had damaged the credibility of the State Department and undermined public trust in the government.
The Allure of Law-Breaking: Impact on Decision-Making
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Improper sharing of classified information
Hillary Clinton has been accused of improperly sharing classified information. During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers.
A years-long FBI investigation into Clinton's handling of classified information resulted in no criminal charges, but it revealed that Clinton and her campaign made statements in the past about her email use that have turned out to be false or misleading. Clinton repeatedly claimed that she did not send or receive any information that was marked classified in her personal emails. That’s false. FBI Director James Comey said more than 2,000 emails contained classified information and some of them “bore markings indicating the presence of classified information”.
A U.S. State Department investigation of Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state found no evidence of deliberate mishandling of classified information by department employees. The investigation, the results of which were released on Friday by Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley's office, centred on whether Clinton, who served as the top U.S. diplomat from 2009 to 2013, jeopardized classified information by using a private email server rather than a government one. Clinton turned over roughly 33,000 emails from her private server in 2014, and the State Department probe found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information".
However, federal agencies did, retrospectively determine that 100 emails contained information that should have been deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails were retroactively designated confidential by the State Department.
Families in Containment Camps: Lawbreakers or Victims?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Conspiracy
Hillary Clinton has been accused of conspiring with President Obama and/or Attorney General Loretta Lynch to prevent her prosecution for breaking several laws in connection with her mishandling of official documents. She installed and used a private server in her home to transact Government business, as well as using a number of portable electronic devices for the same purpose. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be obliterated and all of the portable devices to be destroyed.
Former Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Ken Cuccinelli, has put forth the theory that Clinton could face the same criminal charge which CIA Director General David Petraeus pled to after it was revealed that he improperly shared classified information with his biographer.
Breaking into Big Law: Strategies for Success
You may want to see also
Explore related products
![emails i can't send fwd: [LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61kvxtyItBL._AC_UY218_.jpg)
False Statements
Hillary Clinton has been accused of breaking the law in several ways. Firstly, she installed and used a private server in her home to transact government business, as well as using a number of portable electronic devices for the same purpose. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed.
Clinton has also been accused of lying about her awareness of these emails and their subsequent preservation, which may be cause for additional criminal charges. The central probe into her conduct surrounds her handling of classified information. Notably, the information doesn’t necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute.
While Clinton’s potential legal liability for her actions may be minimal, the possible political ramifications for her couldn’t be greater. Some have even gone as far as to say that she is an "unrepentant, sleazy liar" and that she is displaying symptoms of early-stage dementia, making her unfit to be president.
Mark Meechan's Controversial Speech: Crossing Legal Boundaries?
You may want to see also
Money Laundering
Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and several portable electronic devices to transact government business has been a source of controversy. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all the portable devices to be destroyed. This incident has raised questions about potential money laundering activities.
While the specifics of Clinton's actions remain unclear, the potential implications are significant. Money laundering often involves a complex network of transactions, including the use of shell companies, offshore accounts, and other deceptive practices. It is a global issue, as laundered funds can move across borders, making it challenging for law enforcement agencies to detect and trace.
The political ramifications of such an incident are also noteworthy, especially given the timing of the Iowa Caucuses. Money laundering scandals can erode public trust in political figures and institutions, impacting election outcomes and shaping public perception of government integrity.
While the full extent of Clinton's involvement in potential money laundering activities remains unknown, the incident underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government. It highlights the need for stringent measures to prevent and detect financial crimes, ensuring that those in positions of power are held to the highest standards of ethical conduct.
Americans' Social Justice: When Breaking Laws is Necessary
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Yes, she broke several laws by using a private server and portable electronic devices to transact government business. She also destroyed 33,000 emails and portable devices containing government information.
Conspiracy, False Statements, Money Laundering, Obstruction, Perjury, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Bank Fraud, and Tax Evasion.
The possible political ramifications for Clinton couldn't be greater, given the Iowa Caucuses were less than three months away.
