Gavin Howe
Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and personal electronic devices to transact government business has raised questions about whether she broke the law. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. While Clinton's potential legal liability for her actions may be minimal, the political ramifications could be significant. The central probe into her conduct surrounds her handling of classified information.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Using a private server to transact Government business | Yes |
| Using portable electronic devices for the same purpose | Yes |
| Causing 33,000 emails to be deleted | Yes |
| Destroying portable devices | Yes |
| Improperly sharing classified information with her biographer | Yes |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
Mishandling of official documents
Hillary Clinton's use of a private server in her home to transact government business, as well as her use of portable electronic devices for the same purpose, has been the subject of much scrutiny. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. This led to accusations of mishandling of official documents and violations of several laws. The FBI released a report on 9/2/2016 after interviewing Clinton regarding these violations.
Clinton's actions may have minimal legal liability, but the political ramifications could be significant. The potential crimes committed by Clinton are more obscure but no less serious. Former Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Ken Cuccinelli, theorised that Clinton could face the same criminal charge as CIA Director General David Petraeus, who improperly shared classified information with his biographer. It is important to note that the information does not necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute.
Anne Hutchinson: Lawbreaker or Freedom Fighter?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Improper sharing of classified information
Hillary Clinton was accused of improperly sharing classified information with her biographer. This is a serious offence, with the potential for criminal charges. In fact, former CIA Director General David Petraeus pled guilty to the same charge.
Clinton's actions may have minimal legal liability, but the political ramifications could be significant. The Iowa Caucuses were less than three months away at the time of the accusation, and the potential for damage to her campaign was high.
Clinton was also accused of using a private server and portable electronic devices to transact government business. This is a separate issue from the improper sharing of classified information, but it is worth noting as it relates to the overall question of what laws Clinton may have broken. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, Clinton caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. This action potentially broke several laws and led to calls for her prosecution.
It is important to note that the information does not necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute. The statute covers a broad range of information that could be considered sensitive or confidential. As such, even if the information shared by Clinton was not explicitly marked as classified, she may still have broken the law.
Understanding Copyright Law: What You Should Never Do
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Conspiracy
Hillary Clinton was accused of breaking several laws in connection with her mishandling of official documents. The most prominent of these was conspiracy.
The specific details of the conspiracy charge against Clinton are not entirely clear, but it is believed to be related to her use of a private server and portable electronic devices to transact government business. This led to concerns about the security and integrity of sensitive information. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, Clinton caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. This action potentially obstructed the investigation and may have constituted a conspiracy to conceal evidence.
The conspiracy charge against Clinton has been compared to the case of CIA Director General David Petraeus, who pled guilty to a similar offence. Petraeus improperly shared classified information with his biographer, and this case set a precedent for how such offences should be handled. However, despite the serious allegations, Clinton was not prosecuted for conspiracy or any other charges. This was reportedly due to the direct intervention of President Obama and/or Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Jesus: Law Breaker or Lawful Messiah?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
![emails i can’t send fwd: [Explicit]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51o18Qpqt7L._AC_UY218_.jpg)
False statements
Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and personal electronic devices to transact government business has been the subject of much scrutiny. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed. This led to accusations of false statements, as well as other charges such as conspiracy, money laundering, obstruction, perjury, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and tax evasion.
The FBI interviewed Clinton regarding her mishandling of official documents, but she was not prosecuted due to the intervention of President Obama and/or Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
The potential legal liability for Clinton's actions may be minimal, but the political ramifications are significant, especially with the Iowa Caucuses approaching.
It is important to note that the information in question does not need to be marked as classified to violate the statute.
Jail Tears: Breaking Laws, Shattered Lives
You may want to see also
Money laundering
Hillary Clinton has been accused of breaking several laws, including money laundering.
Clinton was accused of installing and using a private server in her home to transact government business, as well as using a number of portable electronic devices for the same purpose. After being subpoenaed to preserve the devices and their contents, she caused 33,000 emails to be deleted and all of the portable devices to be destroyed.
This led to accusations of mishandling official documents and violating statutes regarding the sharing of classified information. The FBI interviewed Clinton regarding these violations, but no charges were brought due to the intervention of President Obama and/or Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
In the case of Clinton, the specific details of the money laundering accusations are unclear. However, it is possible that she was accused of using her private server and portable devices to conceal or obfuscate the source of funds obtained through illegal or unethical means.
While Clinton was not charged with money laundering, the accusations and potential legal ramifications had significant political consequences, especially with the Iowa Caucuses approaching. The case highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in government, and the need for strict enforcement of laws against money laundering to maintain public trust and ensure the integrity of the political system.
Trump's Arlington Cemetery Visit: Legal or Not?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Yes, Hillary Clinton broke the law by using a private server and a number of portable electronic devices to transact government business. She also caused 33,000 emails to be obliterated and all of the portable devices to be destroyed.
Clinton broke several laws relating to the mishandling of official documents. The crimes she committed are more obscure but no less serious.
While Clinton’s potential legal liability for her actions may be minimal, the possible political ramifications for her couldn’t be greater.
