Actual Lawsuits Filed: Understanding The Real Numbers

The majority of lawsuits are settled outside of court. According to Randall L. Kiser, a principal analyst at DecisionSet, estimates range from 80 to 92% of cases, or even up to 97%. However, it's hard to know the exact figure due to the confidential nature of dispute resolution.

Around 95% of lawsuits end in pre-trial settlements

The majority of lawsuits are settled outside of a court of law. According to the New York Times, Randall L. Kiser, a principal analyst at DecisionSet, states that "the vast majority of cases do settle—from 80 to 92 percent by some estimates." Other sources even claim that this number is closer to 97 percent. However, a paper published by Cornell Law Faculty Publications disputes these figures, stating that a more accurate settlement rate would be two-thirds, and that a 95 percent settlement rate "finds little support in actual practice."

Despite the slight variation in estimates, it is clear that a significant proportion of lawsuits end in pre-trial settlements. In fact, according to the most recently available statistics, about 95 percent of pending lawsuits end in a pre-trial settlement. This means that only a small fraction of cases, approximately one in 20 personal injury cases, are resolved in a court of law by a judge or jury.

There are several reasons why pre-trial settlements are favoured by both plaintiffs and defendants. For plaintiffs, settling out of court can result in a higher payout compared to going to trial. According to a study cited in the New York Times article, plaintiffs who passed up a settlement offer and went to trial ended up receiving less money than if they had settled. The study found that in 61 percent of cases, plaintiffs made the wrong decision by rejecting a settlement offer and opting for a trial.

On the other hand, defendants may also benefit from pre-trial settlements as it allows them to avoid potential reputational damage and public scrutiny that could come with a trial. Additionally, settling out of court can be a more cost-effective and efficient option for both parties, helping to preserve professional relationships and avoid the uncertainty and risks associated with a trial.

Overall, the high percentage of lawsuits ending in pre-trial settlements highlights the importance of considering settlement options during the legal strategy planning phase. It also underscores the value of alternative dispute resolution processes, such as mediation and arbitration, which can provide a private, accelerated, and cost-effective path to resolving legal disputes.

Plaintiffs win over 90% of cases that go to trial

It is estimated that between 80 and 92% of cases settle before going to trial, with some sources claiming this number is closer to 97%. However, this varies depending on the type of case. For instance, in a paper published by Cornell Law Faculty Publications, it is stated that only tort cases approached a 90% settlement rate, and that two-thirds would be a more accurate single settlement rate.

Despite the high settlement rate, plaintiffs still win over 90% of cases that go to trial. This means that defendants may be better off settling, especially if they lack strong evidence. This is supported by a study of 2,054 cases that went to trial from 2002 to 2005, which found that plaintiffs who passed up a settlement offer and went to trial ended up with less money than if they had settled. The study also found that defendants made the wrong decision by proceeding to trial in 24% of cases, while plaintiffs were wrong in 61% of cases.

The preference for settling is also due to the fact that trials are expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable. With Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes, both parties can argue their points in private during an accelerated and cost-effective process, preserving their professional relationships.

Defendants are rarely found culpable during trial

It is true that defendants are rarely found culpable during a trial, as the vast majority of cases are settled before they ever reach a courtroom. According to the New York Times, 80-92% of cases are settled without going to trial, with other sources claiming this number is closer to 97%.

This is because going to court rarely serves either party's best interests. Plaintiffs who decide to pass up a settlement offer and go to trial often end up with less money than if they had settled. For defendants, a pre-trial settlement can protect their reputation and dignity. In addition, trials are expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable.

In the case of criminal law, plea deals are often made, as the government does not have the resources to try every case and may not want to risk an acquittal. Defendants who agree to plead guilty or no contest typically receive lighter sentences and have less serious charges on their records.

Personal injury cases also rarely go to trial, with only around 5% of cases reaching this stage. This is because most cases are straightforward and can hinge on the testimony of a single key witness or the examination of certain records. As such, it is in the best interest of defendants who lack strong evidence to settle before going to trial.

Settlements are financially favourable to plaintiffs

The vast majority of cases are settled outside of court, with estimates ranging from 80 to 97 percent. While the exact percentage is difficult to pinpoint due to the confidential nature of dispute resolution, it is clear that most cases do not go to trial. This is because going to court is rarely in either party's best interest, as it is expensive, time-consuming, and may not result in a favourable outcome for either side.

For plaintiffs, settling out of court can result in a higher financial payout. In the New York Times article, it is stated that "plaintiffs who decided to pass up a settlement offer and went to trial ended up getting less money than if they had taken the offer." This is likely because defendants are less likely to be found culpable during a trial. Additionally, plaintiffs who settle out of court can avoid the risk of losing the case and receiving no financial compensation at all.

Another advantage of settling out of court is the potential to preserve professional relationships. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, such as mediation and arbitration, can help resolve the dispute privately and accelerate the process. This can be especially beneficial in business or contract disputes where maintaining a working relationship is important.

Furthermore, contingency fee arrangements in personal injury cases incentivize attorneys to work diligently for their clients. Since the attorney's payment is directly tied to the case's success, their interests are aligned with the plaintiff's. This means that plaintiffs can seek every dollar available to them, including compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering, without worrying about upfront legal fees.

Finally, settling out of court can protect the plaintiff's reputation and dignity. While the defendant's reputation may also be protected, the primary financial benefit of settlements tends to favour the plaintiff.

Trials are expensive and time-consuming

The reality of trials is that they are rarely worth the time, effort, and money spent on them. This is true for several reasons, which we will outline below.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

ADR processes such as mediation and arbitration are often faster and more cost-effective than traditional trials. In 2017, a whopping 75% of voluntary ADR proceedings were resolved, and even 77% of unresolved cases still achieved benefits, resulting in 1,967 months of litigation avoided.

Risk of Financial Loss

Trials are unpredictable, and there is always the risk that you will end up with less money than if you had settled. According to a study by Randall L. Kiser, plaintiffs who decided to pass up a settlement offer and went to trial ended up with less money 61% of the time. The study also found that defendants made the wrong decision by proceeding to trial 24% of the time.

Emotional and Mental Stress

Trials can be incredibly stressful for all parties involved, including witnesses and family members. The process can be emotionally draining and mentally exhausting, especially if the trial is prolonged.

Impact on Professional Relationships

Going to trial can also damage professional relationships, which may be crucial to your business or career. Alternative dispute resolution processes, on the other hand, can help preserve these relationships by providing a more private and amicable way to resolve conflicts.

Loss of Control

When you go to trial, you are putting the outcome of your case in the hands of a judge or jury. This means that you have little to no control over the final decision, which can be a scary prospect.

Time Commitment

Trials can be incredibly time-consuming, not just for the lawyers but also for the parties involved. This can take away time and attention from other important areas of your life or business.

In conclusion, it is clear that trials are often not worth the expense and hassle. Alternative dispute resolution processes can provide a faster, more efficient, and less risky way to resolve conflicts while preserving relationships and giving more control over the outcome to the parties involved.

Frequently asked questions