The Evolution Of Seatbelt Laws: When Did They Start?

The history of seatbelt laws is a fascinating one, and it's surprising to learn that they were not always widely accepted. In the United States, the first seat belt law was introduced in 1968, making it mandatory for all vehicles (except buses) to be fitted with seat belts. However, the battle for mandatory seat belt laws continued into the 1980s, with resistance from those who viewed it as a violation of personal freedom and government overreach. New York became the first state to require vehicle occupants to wear seat belts as of December 1, 1984, with a \$50 fine for non-compliance. Despite the controversies, seat belts are now considered one of the most cost-effective public health inventions, saving thousands of lives each year.

In 1968, seat belts became mandatory in all vehicles in the US

The history of seat belt legislation in the US is a fascinating one, and it is surprising that it took until the late 1960s for seat belts to become mandatory. The first seat belt was invented way back in the 19th century by Sir George Cayley, an English landowner interested in flight. However, it wasn't until the 1950s that seat belts started to become more common in cars, with Nash Motors offering them as an additional feature in 1949 and Volvo introducing the now-standard three-point seat belt in 1959.

Despite the growing presence of seat belts in cars, there was significant resistance to their mandatory use in the US. This resistance was based on a variety of arguments, including concerns about comfort and restrictiveness, fears that seat belts would make it difficult to escape from a damaged car, and ideological objections to government overreach. In fact, when Michigan State Rep. David Hollister introduced a seat belt bill in the early 1980s, he received hate mail comparing him to Hitler.

It is worth noting that the 1968 federal law only required the installation of seat belts and did not mandate their use. The decision to make seat belt use compulsory was left to individual states. New York became the first state to pass such a law in 1984, with a fine of $50 for non-compliance. Over time, most other states followed suit, and today, seat belt use is widely accepted and understood to be based on good science and common sense.

New York was the first state to require the use of seat belts

In 1984, New York became the first state in the US to require the use of seat belts, with a bill that came into effect on January 1, 1985. The law mandated that only front-seat passengers wear seat belts and face a $50 fine if they did not comply.

In 2020, the law was expanded to include all passengers, regardless of age and seating position, with enforcement beginning on November 1, 2020. This means that police officers can pull over drivers if they observe any passenger not wearing a seat belt and can issue fines or summonses. The penalty for adult passengers is a $50 ticket for each unbuckled passenger, while passengers under 16 will result in a $25-$100 fine and three driver's license points for each violation.

The only exceptions to the law are buses and emergency vehicles, although passengers are still encouraged to wear seat belts in these vehicles whenever possible.

New York's seat belt law is a "primary enforcement law", which means that a police officer can stop someone for not wearing a seat belt without needing another reason for the stop. This is in contrast to "secondary enforcement", where an officer can only cite a driver for a seat belt violation if they have pulled them over for another reason, such as speeding or running a stop sign.

The implementation of mandatory seat belt laws in New York and other states has been an important step in improving road safety and reducing traffic-related injuries and fatalities.

Resistance to seat belts was ideological

Resistance to seat belts was largely ideological. In the 1980s, when seat belt laws were introduced, only 14% of Americans used them. The public backlash reflected widespread ambivalence over the role and value of government regulation.

When Michigan State Rep. David Hollister introduced a seat belt bill in the early 1980s, he received hate mail comparing him to Hitler. One of Hollister's colleagues in the Michigan House called the bill "a pretty good lesson in mass hysteria created by a corporate-controlled media". Another said that anyone who voted for the bill should be recalled.

Newspapers carried stories of protesters loudly proclaiming their right to self-determination and lamenting the rise of the nanny state. A Gallup poll from July 1984 showed that 65% of Americans opposed mandatory belt laws. In a survey the following year, drivers said they thought the restraints were "ineffective, inconvenient, and uncomfortable".

Resistance to seat belts was often framed as a defence of personal freedoms and individual choice. Some argued that seat belts were uncomfortable or cumbersome, while others expressed fear of the technology, believing that it would be safer to be thrown free of the wreckage, beltless.

The auto industry was also reluctant to push seat belts on customers. An emphasis on safety innovations left the impression that something was wrong with the car. Manufacturers believed that including too many safety features would give consumers the impression that the car was unsafe.

The Reagan administration opposed mandatory seat belt laws

The Reagan administration's opposition to mandatory seat belt laws was influenced by the president's ideological stance on deregulation. Ronald Reagan's 1980 election campaign centred on reducing government intervention, particularly in the automotive industry.

Upon taking office, Reagan opposed a 1977 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) rule that required car manufacturers to include some form of passive restraint, such as airbags, in vehicles. The NHTSA's rule was a response to the failure of a previous attempt to improve safety. In 1973, the NHTSA mandated that all new cars be fitted with an interlock mechanism that prevented them from starting unless the driver's seat belt was buckled. However, this move provoked a strong negative reaction from the public, who felt it was an example of government overreach. Congress repealed the law in 1974.

The Reagan administration's decision to revoke the NHTSA's 1977 rule was challenged by insurance companies, who had a vested interest in improving passenger safety. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in favour of the insurers, forcing the administration to reinstate the requirement for passive restraints.

In response, Transportation Secretary Elizabeth Dole issued a compromise ruling in 1985. This required carmakers to install airbags in all new cars unless two-thirds of states passed mandatory seat belt laws by 1 April 1989. This put the onus on individual states to pass seat belt laws, rather than enforcing a federal regulation.

Despite intense lobbying from car companies, the necessary two-thirds of states failed to pass the required laws, and carmakers were ultimately required to install airbags in the early 1990s.

Public education campaigns helped increase seat belt usage

Public education campaigns have been instrumental in increasing seat belt usage, with the Ad Council and the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) playing pivotal roles. Their Seat Belt Education campaign, launched in 1985, featured Vince and Larry, two crash test dummies who dramatized the consequences of not wearing a seatbelt. The campaign's impact was significant, with a DOT survey reporting a notable increase in seat belt usage in the first six months of 1986. Overall, between 1982 and 1988, seat belt usage by all vehicle passengers nationwide surged from 11% to 47%.

The effectiveness of these campaigns is further underscored by the fact that, despite initial resistance and ideological opposition to mandatory seat belt laws, public sentiment shifted towards recognizing the importance of seat belts. This shift in attitude contributed to the enactment of seat belt laws in a majority of states, with New York leading the way in 1984.

The success of public education campaigns is also evident in the increased seat belt usage rates in states with secondary seat belt laws. Well-planned media and enforcement campaigns can significantly impact usage rates, as demonstrated in Nevada, where an effective combination of media-based education and enforcement campaigns contributed to its high ranking in seat belt usage nationwide.

The influence of public education campaigns extends beyond individual states. In the first six years of the Seat Belt Education campaign, it garnered over $337 million in donated media time and space, reflecting its widespread reach and impact. The campaign's longevity and adaptability are also noteworthy, with shifts in focus over time to address specific concerns, such as child safety and targeting part-time seat belt users.

The efforts of the Ad Council and NHTSA, along with various state and local initiatives, have been instrumental in increasing seat belt usage, saving countless lives, and making our roads safer.

Frequently asked questions