The Three-Strike Law: Effective In California Since 1994

The Three Strikes and You're Out law was enacted in California in 1994, and it imposes a life sentence for almost any felony committed after two prior convictions for serious or violent felonies. The law was passed in response to the murders of Kimber Reynolds and Polly Klaas, with the aim of reducing the crime rate and deterring criminal activity by extending the sentences of repeat felony offenders. The law requires a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for three-time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions.

The three-strikes law was enacted in California in 1994

The "Three Strikes and You're Out" law was enacted in California in 1994. It was signed into law by Governor Wilson on March 7, 1994, as AB 971 (Ch 12/94, Jones). The law was enacted in response to the murders of Kimber Reynolds and Polly Klaas, with the aim of keeping "murderers, rapists, and child molesters behind bars".

The law imposes a life sentence for almost any crime, regardless of severity, if the defendant has two prior convictions for serious or violent felonies. This means that a defendant with two previous serious or violent felony convictions will face a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for a third conviction.

The law also has implications for second-time offenders. If a person has one previous serious or violent felony conviction, the sentence for any new felony conviction is doubled.

The Three Strikes law has had a significant impact on California's criminal justice system. It has led to an increase in the number of cases being prosecuted, with thousands of second- and third-strike cases filed statewide. It has also resulted in fewer guilty pleas, as defendants are less likely to plea bargain and are instead opting to take their cases to jury trial due to the longer prison sentences they face. This, in turn, has led to a significant increase in jury trials and an increase in the number of persons held in county jail awaiting trial.

The law has also had budgetary implications, with some counties augmenting the budgets of their criminal justice agencies to cope with the increased workload. In addition, the law disproportionately affects minority and disabled defendants and adds billions to the state's prison budget.

It requires a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for three-time repeat offenders

The "Three Strikes and You're Out" law was enacted in California in 1994, and it requires a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for three-time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. This law was passed in response to several high-profile murders committed by ex-felons, which raised concerns that violent offenders were being released from prison only to commit new crimes. The law is designed to keep repeat violent offenders behind bars by imposing longer prison sentences and removing the possibility of probation, suspension, or diversion.

Under the Three Strikes law, a person convicted of a felony with one previous serious or violent felony conviction will have their sentence for the new felony conviction doubled. These offenders are often referred to as "second strikers". If a person has two or more previous serious or violent felony convictions, the sentence for any new felony conviction is life imprisonment with a minimum term of 25 years. These offenders are referred to as "third strikers".

The Three Strikes law also includes several other key provisions. It requires consecutive sentencing for multiple offenses committed by strikers, meaning that the sentences for each offense are added together. There is no limit to the number of felonies that can be included in the consecutive sentence. Additionally, the length of time between the prior and new felony convictions does not affect the imposition of the new sentence, and even offenses committed many years before can be counted as prior strikes.

The law also prohibits probation, suspension, or diversion for the new felony conviction, and the defendant must be committed to state prison. Strikers are limited in their ability to reduce their prison time through "good time" credits and must serve at least 80% of their sentence. Prosecutors have the discretion to move to dismiss or "strike" prior felonies from consideration during sentencing.

The Three Strikes law has had a significant impact on California's criminal justice system, resulting in longer prison sentences for repeat offenders and an increase in the prison population. However, it has also been criticised for its harshness, particularly in cases where the third strike offense is not serious or violent. In 2012, California voters passed the Three Strikes Reform Act ("Proposition 36") to address some of these concerns, eliminating life sentences for non-serious, non-violent crimes and establishing a procedure for inmates sentenced to life under the original law to petition for a reduced sentence.

The law was enacted in response to several high-profile murders

California's "Three-Strike" law, also known as the "Three Strikes and You're Out" law, was enacted in 1994 in response to the murders of Kimber Reynolds and Polly Klaas. The law imposes a prison sentence of 25 years to life for defendants convicted of their third violent or serious felony.

The law was designed to decrease the crime rate and improve public safety by putting repeat offenders behind bars. It aimed to keep "murderers, rapists, and child molesters behind bars, where they belong", according to official ballot materials promoting the original Three Strikes law.

Under the Three Strikes law, a "third strike" defendant is someone who has two prior convictions for serious or violent felonies and is charged with another serious or violent felony. If both these conditions are met, the defendant faces a sentence of 25 years to life for their current charge.

The law also has implications for "second strike" defendants, who are those with one prior conviction for a serious or violent felony. In these cases, the prison sentence for the second felony is doubled.

While the Three Strikes law was intended to target violent offenders, it has resulted in harsh sentences for non-violent crimes as well. More than half of inmates sentenced under the law are serving time for non-violent offences. For example, clients of the Three Strikes Project have received life sentences for offences such as stealing one dollar in loose change from a parked car, possessing less than a gram of narcotics, and attempting to break into a soup kitchen.

In 2012, California voters recognised the flaws in the original Three Strikes law and passed Proposition 36, which eliminated life sentences for non-serious, non-violent crimes. This reform was the first voter initiative since the Civil War to reduce the sentences of inmates currently serving time. Over 1,000 prisoners were released from custody under Prop. 36 in the first eight months of its enactment, with a recidivism rate of less than 2%.

It has been criticised for disproportionately affecting minority populations

California's "Three Strikes and You're Out" law was signed into law in 1994 by Governor Wilson. The law mandates a prison sentence of 25 years to life for defendants convicted of their third violent felony or serious felony.

The law has been criticised for disproportionately affecting minority populations. Statistics from the California Department of Corrections show that over 45% of inmates serving life sentences under the law are African American. A study by the San Francisco-based Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice found that African Americans are sentenced to prison under the law at a rate 13 times that of whites. This is despite the fact that African Americans make up only 7% of the general population and 20% of all felony arrests in California.

The study also found that 83% of those sentenced under the law are non-violent offenders, many of them drug offenders. This is supported by a study by Chen, which found that racial disparities in sentencing were greater for property and drug offences than for violent crimes. Chen's study also found that African American and American Indian populations received third-strike sentences at a greater frequency than other ethnicities.

The disproportionate impact of the law on minority populations has been attributed to racial imbalances in the staff of district attorneys' offices and the criminal justice system more broadly. The high number of African Americans sentenced under the law has also been attributed to the fact that a disproportionately high number of victims in third-strike cases against African American defendants are also African American.

In addition to disproportionately affecting minority populations, the law has also been criticised for its impact on mentally ill and physically disabled defendants, as well as the high cost to the state's prison budget.

The law has been amended to eliminate life sentences for non-violent, non-serious crimes

California's "Three Strikes and You're Out" law was enacted in 1994, imposing a life sentence for almost any crime, no matter how minor, if the defendant had two prior convictions for serious or violent crimes as defined by the California Penal Code. However, in 2012, the law was amended through the Three Strikes Reform Act ("Proposition 36") to eliminate life sentences for non-violent, non-serious crimes. This amendment was a response to the harsh and unintended consequences of the original sentencing law, which saw over 50% of inmates serving sentences for nonviolent crimes.

The 2012 amendment established a procedure for inmates sentenced to life imprisonment for minor third-strike crimes to petition the court for a reduced sentence. To be successful, the court must find that the prisoner no longer poses an unreasonable threat to public safety. This initiative was the first of its kind since the Civil War to reduce the sentences of inmates currently serving their sentences.

The impact of this amendment was significant. In the first eight months of its enactment, over 1,000 prisoners were released from custody under Proposition 36, with a recidivism rate of less than 2%—a number well below state and national averages. The financial implications were also notable, saving California taxpayers between $10 and $13 million. If this reform is applied to all eligible inmates, Californians are estimated to save nearly $1 billion over the next decade.

The original Three Strikes law disproportionately affected minority and disabled defendants, with over 45% of inmates serving life sentences being African American. The high cost of the law added over $19 billion to California's prison budget, and it kept prisons overcrowded. The 2012 amendment addressed these issues, and criminologists agree that life sentences for non-violent repeat offenders do not improve public safety.

In addition to the 2012 amendment, California has continued to revisit its three-strike sentencing. In 2018, the state announced it would reconsider life sentences for up to 4,000 non-violent third-strike criminals by allowing them to seek parole. This decision was based on a court ruling that the state was illegally excluding non-violent career criminals from parole under a 2016 ballot measure aimed at reducing the prison population and encouraging rehabilitation.

Frequently asked questions