Motorcycle Helmets: Uk Law And Its Historical Implementation

The law requiring motorcyclists to wear helmets in the UK was introduced on 7 February 1973 and came into operation on 1 June 1973. The law was debated in the House of Commons on 5 April 1973, with members from either side taking opposing views. Many considered the law as a ''gross infringement of personal liberty'. However, the bill was passed, making it a requirement for all riders to wear a safety helmet that meets British Safety Standards when riding a motorcycle or moped on the road.

The law was introduced on 7 February 1973 and came into operation on 1 June 1973

The UK crash helmet law was introduced on 7 February 1973 and came into operation on 1 June 1973. The law was debated in the House of Commons on 5 April 1973, with members from either side taking opposing views. Many considered the law as a gross infringement of personal liberty, while others argued that it was necessary to protect people from their own wilful and habitual actions.

The introduction of the law was a significant moment for motorcycling in the UK, as it established a precedent for "safety" legislation for this form of transport. The law states that all motorcyclists must wear a safety helmet that meets British safety standards when riding on the road. The helmet must meet certain standards, including the British Standard BS 6658:1985 and carrying the BSI Kitemark, or a European Economic Area member standard offering equivalent safety protection.

The law was met with opposition from some groups, including the Motorcycle Action Group (MAG), who argued that each biker should have the right to make personal decisions about their welfare. MAG continues to campaign for the law to be repealed, even though the majority of motorcyclists in the UK (around 88%) were already wearing crash helmets before the law was passed.

The introduction of the helmet law in the UK was a controversial topic, with arguments for and against the legislation. Some saw it as an infringement of personal liberty, while others viewed it as a necessary safety measure. Ultimately, the law was passed and came into operation on 1 June 1973, making it a requirement for all riders to wear a motorcycle helmet that met the specified safety standards.

The law states that helmets must meet British Standard BS 6658:1985 and carry the BSI Kitemark

The UK law on motorcycle helmets was introduced on 7 February 1973 and was debated at the House of Commons on 5 April 1973. The law came into operation on 1 June 1973.

Meeting this standard ensures that the helmet provides adequate protection in the event of a crash. The British Standard BS 6658:1985 is one of three standards that helmets worn on UK roads must meet, the other two being UNECE Regulation 22.05 and a European Economic Area member standard offering the same safety and protection as BS 6658:1985, along with an equivalent mark to the BSI Kitemark.

Retailers selling helmets that do not meet the required standards can be fined. The Safety Helmet Assessment and Rating Programme (SHARP) was launched in 2007 by the Department for Transport to provide additional information on helmet safety and to help motorcyclists make informed choices when purchasing a helmet. SHARP rates helmets using a 1-to-5 star system, with 5 stars indicating superior all-round protection.

The Sikh exemption: Sikhs are exempt from wearing helmets if they wear a turban

In the UK, it became compulsory to wear a safety helmet when riding a motorcycle or moped on the road on 1 June 1973. However, this law does not apply to individuals riding quad and trikes, except in Northern Ireland. The law also exempts turban-wearing Sikhs from wearing motorcycle helmets.

The Sikh Exemption

The Sikh exemption from wearing motorcycle helmets is a result of the Employment Act 1989, as amended by Section 6 of the Deregulation Act 2015. This legislation exempts turban-wearing Sikhs from any legal requirement to wear head protection in the workplace. The workplace is defined broadly and includes any private dwelling, vehicle, aircraft, installation, or moveable structure, such as construction sites.

The exemption was initially only applicable to construction sites but was extended to all workplaces from 1 October 2015. This change provided certainty for employers, who are required to balance health and safety needs with their employees' right to express their religious beliefs freely.

It is important to note that the exemption applies solely to members of the Sikh religion who wear a turban and does not extend to other forms of head coverings. Additionally, Sikhs are still required to wear all other necessary personal protective equipment as mandated by regulations.

There are limited exceptions to the exemption, mainly involving the armed forces and emergency response situations where a risk assessment has identified that head protection is essential for the protection of the individual. For example, a firefighter entering a burning building or dealing with hazardous materials.

While the Sikh exemption from wearing motorcycle helmets is a legal accommodation for the expression of religious beliefs, it is crucial to understand the potential risks involved. Not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle can be extremely dangerous, as it increases the likelihood of severe or fatal head and brain injuries in the event of an accident.

The founding of the Motorcycle Action Group (MAG): The group was founded in response to the introduction of the law and continues to campaign for its repeal

The Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) was founded in response to the introduction of the law mandating the wearing of helmets when riding motorcycles in the UK. The group continues to advocate for the repeal of this law.

The UK crash helmet law, introduced on February 7, 1973, and implemented on June 1, 1973, requires all motorcyclists to wear safety helmets that adhere to British safety standards. While the law faced opposition in the House of Commons, with some deeming it an infringement of personal liberty, it ultimately passed.

MAG was established by Dennis Howard, who disagreed with the compulsory nature of the law. The group's philosophy centres on the belief that bikers should have the autonomy to make personal decisions regarding their welfare. MAG asserts that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to wear a helmet while riding their motorcycles.

Since its inception, MAG has remained steadfast in its efforts to overturn the helmet law. The group actively campaigns for the repeal of the legislation, arguing that bikers should be trusted to make their own decisions regarding their safety. MAG's stance is grounded in the principle of individual freedom and the belief that government intervention in personal choices should be minimal.

In addition to its advocacy for the repeal of the helmet law, MAG also functions as a rider's rights organisation. It champions and promotes motorcycling across the UK, offering membership benefits such as access to national and local events. MAG is committed to ensuring that the interests and rights of motorcyclists are represented and protected through its campaigns and initiatives.

The law was debated in the House of Commons on 5 April 1973, with members taking opposing views

On 5 April 1973, the Motorcycle Helmet Law was debated in the House of Commons, with members taking opposing views. The law, officially called the 'Motor Cycles (Wearing of Helmets) Regulations 1973', was passed on 7 February 1973 and was to be put into operation on 1 June 1973.

Many members of the House of Commons opposed the law, considering it a "gross infringement of personal liberty". One of the most vocal opponents was Enoch Powell, who argued that the law would set a dangerous precedent for the erosion of individual freedom and an abuse of legislative power. He believed that the decision to enact the law was based on sentiment and emotion rather than principle. Powell also questioned the effectiveness of the law, citing statistics that showed no significant reduction in motorcyclist fatalities after its introduction.

On the other side of the debate, supporters of the law argued that it was necessary to protect motorcyclists from serious head injuries. This debate had been ongoing for decades, with the first calls for mandatory helmet use coming in the 1930s after T. E. Lawrence, also known as Lawrence of Arabia, died from a head injury sustained in a motorcycle accident. During World War II, Dr Hugh Cairns, a neurosurgeon for the British Army, successfully recommended mandatory helmet use for dispatch riders.

Despite the opposition, the Motorcycle Helmet Law was passed, and it became a requirement for all riders to wear a helmet that met British Safety Standards when riding a motorcycle or moped on UK roads. This standard included the British Standard BS 6658:1985 with the BSI Kitemark, UNECE Regulation 22.05, or an equivalent European standard. The law included an exemption for Sikhs, who were not required to wear helmets while riding motorcycles if they wore a turban instead. This exemption was a point of contention, with some arguing that it set a dangerous precedent and others believing it was preferential treatment for a religious group.

Frequently asked questions