The Evolution Of Presidential Term Limits In Law

The 22nd Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1951, limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States to two terms. The amendment was proposed by Congress in 1947 and came into force on 27 February 1951, when 36 of the 48 states had ratified it. The amendment was a reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's election to an unprecedented four terms as president, but presidential term limits had long been debated in American politics.

The Twenty-Second Amendment

Historical Context

Proposal and Ratification

Provisions

Interaction with the Twelfth Amendment

Repeal Efforts

There have been efforts in Congress to repeal the Twenty-Second Amendment, with arguments that it infringes on democratic rights and prevents consistent leadership during crises. However, the amendment remains in force and has barred several presidents from seeking a third term.

Presidential term limits were debated at the Constitutional Convention

The topic of presidential term limits was extensively debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. At the time, some delegates, including Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, supported lifetime tenure for presidents, while others, such as Virginia's George Mason, opposed this idea, comparing it to an elective monarchy. An early draft of the U.S. Constitution restricted the president to a single seven-year term. However, the Framers ultimately approved four-year terms without any restrictions on the number of terms a president could serve.

The debate around presidential term limits continued beyond the Constitutional Convention. The first U.S. President, George Washington, declined to run for a third term in 1796, setting a two-term precedent that would be followed by the country's next 31 presidents. Thomas Jefferson, the third president, also chose not to seek a third term and wrote about the importance of establishing "a termination to the services of the chief magistrate" to prevent the office from "in fact, becom [ing] for life".

Despite this established tradition, a few presidents before Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to secure a third term. Roosevelt became the only president to win a third and fourth term, sparking concerns about unlimited presidential terms and leading to the proposal and ratification of the 22nd Amendment in 1951, which officially limited presidents to two terms.

The amendment was proposed in response to Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms

The 22nd Amendment to the United States Constitution, which came into force on February 27, 1951, limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States to two terms. This amendment was proposed in response to Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms as president. Roosevelt was the first and, to date, remains the only president to serve more than two terms.

Roosevelt's unprecedented third term, which began on January 20, 1941, was made possible by a combination of factors, including the timing of the election, his personal popularity, and the instability of the times. The election took place as the United States was in the midst of the Great Depression and had just entered World War II. Roosevelt's popularity was at an all-time high, as he had won the 1936 election with more than two-thirds of the popular vote. Additionally, he was able to make a strong case for stability and continuity in the face of economic and global uncertainty.

However, Roosevelt's decision to run for a third term was not without controversy. His campaign resulted in key Democratic supporters and advisors leaving, and he faced opposition from business people and those with means, who argued that he was taking the country down the road of socialism. Despite this, Roosevelt won the 1940 election with 55% of the popular vote and went on to serve a fourth term, winning the 1944 election with 54% of the popular vote.

The proposal and ratification of the 22nd Amendment were driven by concerns about the potential abuse of power and the need to guard against tyrannical rule. The amendment was championed by a Republican-controlled Congress and gained widespread support, with 36 out of 48 states ratifying it. The amendment not only limited the number of terms a president could serve but also set additional eligibility conditions for presidents who succeed to the unexpired terms of their predecessors.

The amendment was ratified in 1951

On February 27, 1951, the 22nd Amendment was ratified, limiting the number of terms served by the President of the United States to two. This amendment was a response to Franklin D. Roosevelt's four consecutive terms in office, which caused concern about a president serving unlimited terms. The 22nd Amendment was first proposed by Congress on March 21, 1947, and was ratified when the 36th state, Minnesota, approved the proposed constitutional change.

The 22nd Amendment states that "no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". It also specifies that a person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected, shall be elected to the office of President no more than once. This amendment aimed to address the concern that a president with unlimited terms could lead to tyranny and a threat to liberty.

The ratification of the 22nd Amendment marked the culmination of a long debate over presidential term limits, which had been discussed since the Constitutional Convention. The amendment's ratification ensured that no individual could be elected President of the United States more than twice, establishing a clear limit on the executive power.

The 22nd Amendment has been the subject of debate and interpretation, with legal scholars discussing the potential for a two-term president to become vice president or hold other offices in the presidential line of succession. Despite some opposition and attempts to repeal the amendment, it remains in place today, shaping the landscape of American politics and the presidency.

The amendment's meaning and application have been questioned

The 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution, which came into force in 1951, limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States to two terms. However, questions have been raised about the amendment's meaning and application, especially in relation to the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804.

The 12th Amendment states that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States". While the 12th Amendment stipulates that the constitutional qualifications of age, citizenship, and residency apply to the president and vice president, it is unclear whether someone who is ineligible to be elected president due to term limits could be elected vice president. This ambiguity has led to differing interpretations of the 22nd Amendment's meaning and application.

Some argue that the 22nd and 12th Amendments bar any two-term president from later serving as vice president, as well as from succeeding to the presidency from any point in the presidential line of succession. This interpretation suggests that a two-term president is constitutionally ineligible to hold any office that could lead to the presidency.

On the other hand, others contend that the original intent of the 12th Amendment was to address qualifications for service, such as age, residence, and citizenship, while the 22nd Amendment focuses on qualifications for election. According to this interpretation, a former two-term president is still eligible to serve as vice president or in other positions in the presidential line of succession. However, they would be prohibited from running for an additional term as president.

The practical applicability of these interpretations has not been tested, as no person has been elected president and vice president in that order, regardless of terms served. Nonetheless, the debate highlights the complexities and ambiguities that can arise when interpreting and applying constitutional amendments.

Frequently asked questions