California's Top Two Primary: Law And History

California adopted a top-two primary system in 2010 after the passage of California Proposition 14. The Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act took effect on January 1, 2011, and created voter-nominated offices. In a top-two primary system, all candidates are listed on the same ballot, and the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of their partisan affiliations.

California's top-two primary system was adopted in 2010

The top-two primary system, which first came into effect for the 2011 elections, selects the two candidates with the most votes to advance to the November general election, regardless of their partisan affiliations. This means that two candidates from the same party could win the primary and face off in the general election. The top-two system is designed to create more competitive primaries and general elections, increase voter turnout, and encourage candidates to engage a wider array of voters.

While the top-two primary system has been credited with making California's political landscape more competitive, it has also faced some criticism and presented new challenges. One criticism is that it may decrease turnout in the general election, as the primary is essentially the first stage of the general election, with much lower turnout due to its timing in June. Additionally, the system has led to concerns about mischievous tactics, such as parties recruiting multiple candidates to fragment the vote and help their own candidates finish in the top two.

Despite these concerns, California's top-two primary system remains in place, and it has had a significant impact on the state's politics and electoral process.

The top-two primary system reduces the influence of political parties

In California, the Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act came into effect on January 1, 2011, creating "voter-nominated" offices for state constitutional offices, state legislative offices, and U.S. congressional offices. This system was first utilised in the 2011 election cycle and has since been adopted by a few other states for some elections.

The top-two primary system provides an alternative to the traditional two-party system and may lead to the election of more moderate legislators. It also makes campaign spending more effective as challengers can earn more votes per dollar spent. However, it can have unintended consequences for political parties and make it difficult for third-party candidates to gain traction.

In a two-party system, such as the one predominantly found in the United States, two major political parties consistently dominate the political landscape. This can be a result of winner-take-all electoral systems and specific voting procedures. Duverger's law states that such systems tend to produce two-party systems, and political scientists have found strong correlations between voting rules and the type of party system that emerges.

The two-party system in the U.S. has been described as a duopoly or an enforced system, with politics dominated by the Republican and Democratic parties. This can lead to a lack of alternative viewpoints and discourage independent or third-party candidates from running for office.

The top-two primary system is labelled a jungle primary by its opponents

California's Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act came into effect on January 1, 2011, creating "voter-nominated" offices. This system, also known as a top-two primary, is labelled a jungle primary by its opponents.

A jungle primary is an election where all candidates for an elected office compete against each other in the same primary, regardless of their political party. The top two candidates with the most votes advance to the next round, which is similar to a runoff election. However, in a jungle primary, there is no separate nomination process for candidates before the first round, and parties cannot narrow the field. This means that two candidates from the same party could advance to the second round, depriving voters of a real choice.

Critics of the jungle primary system argue that it can lead to confusion among voters, who may be unsure of how to cast their ballots. It can also disadvantage candidates from smaller parties, who may not have the resources or support to compete against candidates from larger parties.

Proponents of the system, on the other hand, argue that it encourages candidates to appeal to a wider range of voters and promotes more moderate, centrist politics. They claim that top-two primaries provide an alternative to the two-party system, produce more moderate legislators, and make campaign spending more effective.

The top-two primary system has produced more competitive primaries and general elections

California's Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act came into effect on January 1, 2011, creating "voter-nominated" offices. This system has produced more competitive primaries and general elections.

The top-two primary system has been praised for providing an alternative to the two-party system and reducing partisan gridlock. In this system, all candidates are listed on the same ballot, and the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of their partisan affiliations. This means that two candidates from the same party can win the primary and face off in the general election. This has been argued to give independent and third-party candidates a better chance.

Supporters of the top-two primary system also claim that it produces more moderate legislators. Christian Grose, academic director of the USC Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy, argues that the threat of a same-party general election encourages legislators to moderate their positions. Additionally, the system allows all voters to participate in the primary and general election rounds, creating a moderating incentive for legislators.

Furthermore, the top-two primary system has been said to make campaign spending more effective. Steven Sparks, a political science professor at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, argues that in the absence of differentiating party labels, candidate spending provides more information to voters, helping them make decisions.

The top-two primary system has not fulfilled the hopes of its most optimistic supporters

California's Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act came into effect on January 1, 2011, creating "voter-nominated" offices. The Act does not apply to candidates running for US President, county central committees, or local offices.

The top-two primary system was first utilized in California in 2011 after voters approved Proposition 14 in June 2010. While supporters of the system argue that it provides an alternative to the two-party system, increases moderation, and makes campaign spending more effective, critics say it has not fulfilled the hopes of its most optimistic supporters.

Opponents of the top-two primary system argue that it may decrease turnout in the general election, can have unintended consequences for political parties, and distort the intentions of voters. For example, in California's 2022 state senate elections, six Republicans ran in state Senate District 4, which has a GOP voter registration plurality. The fragmented GOP vote allowed two Democrats to finish in the top two spots.

In addition, the top-two primary system can result in only one party being represented in the general election. For instance, in California's 2016 Senate race, only Democrats were represented, and in the 2016 US Senate race, two Democrats ran against each other. This raises questions about the democratic nature of the system and its potential impact on the future of political parties in California and other states.

Furthermore, the system can be more expensive due to the importance of early organization and the need for earlier and more cost-intensive campaigning. It also eliminates the contrast effect, a political psychological theory that suggests that the presence of a candidate, regardless of their viability, can influence the election by presenting a contrast to other candidates.

While there doesn't seem to be any movement to eliminate the top-two primary system in California, it has not lived up to the expectations of its most optimistic supporters, with critics pointing to decreased voter turnout, unintended consequences for political parties, and distortion of voter intentions.

Frequently asked questions