Understanding Case Law: Court Decision's Legal Impact

Case law, also known as common law, is a law based on precedents or judicial decisions from previous cases. It is distinct from statutory law, which is based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law is derived from the detailed facts of a legal case that has been resolved by courts or similar tribunals. These past decisions are considered precedents that judges in common law countries, such as the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, are bound to follow under the doctrine of stare decisis, or let the decision stand. This means that a court's decision becomes case law when it sets a precedent that future courts must follow in similar cases. However, it's important to note that not all court decisions are published or become binding precedents. Generally, only appellate court decisions that will be used as future precedent are published and become part of case law.

Court decisions are based on facts and law

Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is a law that is based on precedents, or the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals. These past decisions are called "case law" or precedent. Stare decisis, a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand," is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.

In common law countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, case law is used for judicial decisions of selected appellate courts, courts of first instance, agency tribunals, and other bodies discharging adjudicatory functions. The common law tradition involves courts interpreting statutes and applying precedents that record how and why prior cases have been decided. Common law systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, where most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.

In the United States, there is a parallel court system at the federal and state levels, with each branch of government producing a different type of law. The federal court system includes the Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals, and the United States District Courts. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, and its decisions create binding precedent that all other federal courts must follow. The United States Court of Appeals is divided into several circuits, each with its own jurisdiction, and their decisions are binding on the District Courts within their region. The District Courts are the trial courts that deal with violations of federal law, disputes regarding federal laws or treaties, and cases involving residents of different states.

Court decisions are published in print and electronic sources, known as "reporters," and serve as a permanent record of judicial opinions. These published decisions provide an easily cited source for attorneys and researchers to interpret the law and locate relevant case law.

'Stare decisis' is a Latin term meaning to stand by things decided

Case law is the body of law based on judicial decisions and precedents. It is distinct from statutory law, which is derived from legislative bodies, and administrative law, which comes from executive bodies.

Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by things decided". It is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. In other words, stare decisis dictates that courts adhere to previous judgments when overseeing an ongoing case with similar circumstances.

The doctrine of stare decisis is based on the concept of legal precedent, which is a prior ruling or judgment on any case. In the US legal system, stare decisis represents the "doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier decisions when the same points arise again in litigation". There are two types of stare decisis: vertical and horizontal. Vertical stare decisis refers to the decisions of the highest court in a jurisdiction, which create mandatory precedent that must be followed by lower courts in that jurisdiction. For example, the US Supreme Court creates binding precedent that all other federal courts must follow. Horizontal stare decisis, on the other hand, refers to a court applying its own prior decisions to similar facts in future cases.

Stare decisis ensures that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way, promoting consistency and predictability in the legal system. It also lessens the need for subsequent litigation, saving time and resources for the judiciary. However, it is important to note that stare decisis is not an absolute rule, and courts may deviate from precedent in certain circumstances, such as when there is a compelling reason or when a higher court overturns a previous ruling.

Case law is based on precedents

In the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents. These precedents record how and why prior cases have been decided. Common law systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, which means "let the decision stand" in Latin. Under this doctrine, most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts. For example, in the US, the decisions of the US Supreme Court are binding precedent that must be followed by all other federal courts.

Judicial decisions are one of the most important sources of legal authority, and even statutes must be read in conjunction with case law to construe the correct application of the legislation. The doctrine of stare decisis is followed to create and build upon holdings of law, ensuring that people in like circumstances of fact are treated alike.

Case law is the collection of reported cases that form the body of law within a given jurisdiction. It is based on judicial opinions by various courts, which may set future precedent. Courts in the United States adhere to stare decisis, which means that courts generally respect and adhere to the precedent of previous decisions. However, a court does not have to stand by a decision that is not binding precedent. The effect of a court's decision on other courts depends on the level of the court and its jurisdiction.

A court does not have to stand by a non-binding precedent

Case law is based on precedents, or the judicial decisions from previous cases. In the US, stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided", is the doctrine of precedent under which a court follows earlier decisions when the same points arise again in litigation.

However, a court does not have to stand by a non-binding precedent. A non-binding precedent has no true binding force. It is a case that the court might rely on to reach its own decision, but it is not bound to do so. This is especially the case when the facts of the case differ from those in a cited precedent.

In the US, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, and its decisions are binding on all other courts in the country. The decisions of lower courts, such as the US District Courts, must adhere to the precedents set by the Supreme Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals in which they sit.

However, a lower court may wish to distinguish its decision and not follow a precedent. This may be because the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or because there is some material difference between the facts of the cases. In this case, the lower court may express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question.

A lower court may also seek approval to overrule a precedent. For example, the Court of Appeal can overrule a point of law in a previous decision made by a lower court, creating a new binding authority for inferior courts.

In the common law tradition, which includes the UK, US, Canada, and Australia, among others, courts follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. However, the highest court in a jurisdiction, such as the Supreme Court, may deviate from its earlier decisions. For example, in R v Jogee, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled that it and the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the law for nearly 30 years.

In summary, while courts generally adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis and follow binding precedents, there are circumstances in which a court may choose not to stand by a non-binding precedent. This could be due to inconsistencies, changes in legal reasoning, or the desire for a higher court or legislature to reform the rule.

Case law is used for judicial decisions of selected appellate courts

Case law is a law based on precedents, or the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals. These past decisions are called "case law" or precedent.

In common law countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and others, case law is used for the judicial decisions of selected appellate courts, courts of first instance, agency tribunals, and other bodies discharging adjudicatory functions. The United States has a federal court system made up of the Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals, and the United States District Courts. The Supreme Court is the court of last resort in the federal court system and its decisions are binding precedent in all courts. The United States Court of Appeals is made up of appellate courts that deal with appeals from the district courts in their circuit. There are 11 circuit court of appeals, plus 1 federal circuit court of appeals. The United States District Courts are trial courts that deal with violations of federal criminal law, disputes regarding federal laws or treaties, and some cases involving residents of different states.

Appellate courts review trial court decisions to ensure the law was applied correctly. They do not answer questions of fact or review the evidence in a case. Instead, they rule on questions of law, considering legal issues. A decision can mean either the act of delivering a court's order or the text of the court's opinion on the case and the accompanying court order. The text of a decision usually includes a summary of the facts, a discussion of relevant laws, the court's reasoning for how the law applies to the issues at hand, the court's holding (or determination on the legal issues of the case), and the court's orders.

Case law is the collection of reported cases that form the body of law within a given jurisdiction. It is based upon judicial opinions by various courts, which may set future precedent. Courts in the United States adhere to stare decisis, which means that courts respect and adhere to the precedent of previous decisions. A decision by the United States Supreme Court is binding precedent in all courts, while a decision by a lower court is binding only on courts below it.

Frequently asked questions