Nature's Laws: How They Come To Be

The concept of laws in nature is a highly debated topic in philosophy, with two competing theories: the Regularity Theory and the Necessitarian Theory. The Regularity Theory states that laws of nature are descriptions of uniformities or regularities in the world, while the Necessitarian Theory posits that laws of nature are the principles that govern natural phenomena.

The Regularity Theory views laws of nature as universal truths that hold across time and space, based on observations of human nature and natural order. This theory suggests that laws are discovered rather than created and are not subject to change.

On the other hand, the Necessitarian Theory argues that laws of nature are necessary principles that govern the natural world. This theory implies a sense of physical or nomic necessity, suggesting that the natural world obeys these laws.

The debate between these two theories has profound implications, including the question of whether the universe is governed by specific, eternal laws of nature or if it is a cosmic coincidence.

Natural law is based on observation of human nature and natural order

Natural law is a system of law based on the observation of natural order and human nature. It is derived from the belief that there are certain inherent rights that all people are entitled to, which are bestowed by nature, God, or reason, rather than by legislation.

The concept of natural law is based on the idea that there are universal truths about human nature and the natural world that can be discovered through observation and reasoning. This belief has roots in ancient Greek philosophy, with Aristotle and the Stoics being notable contributors. Aristotle is often regarded as the father of natural law, although his association with it is largely due to Thomas Aquinas's interpretation of his work.

According to Aristotle, there is a distinction between "nature" and "law", with "nature" being universal and unchanging, while "law" can vary from place to place. He believed that there was a natural justice that was valid everywhere and not dependent on human thinking. The Stoics further developed this idea, arguing for an egalitarian law of nature based on the logos (reason) inherent in the human mind.

Thomas Aquinas, a key figure in the development of natural law theory, synthesized and expanded upon the ideas of his predecessors. He proposed that there are four types of law: eternal law, natural law, human law, and divine law. Eternal law, which is based on God's eternal reason, is partially knowable to humans through reason and revelation. Natural law, which is a participation in the eternal law by rational creatures, includes precepts for the preservation of one's own good, the fulfillment of natural inclinations, and the pursuit of knowledge of God.

Aquinas argued that human law must conform to natural law to be valid. An unjust law is not truly a law but a "perversion of law" as it goes against the inherent rights and dignity of human beings. This idea has had a significant influence on the development of legal systems and the concept of human rights.

Natural law theory has evolved over time, with contributions from various philosophers and legal scholars. It has been used to challenge divine right monarchies and justify social contracts, positive law, and classical republicanism. Today, natural law continues to be a subject of debate and has proponents such as U.S. Supreme Court justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

Natural law is distinct from scientific and natural laws

Firstly, natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature, from which values are deduced and applied independently of positive law. In other words, natural law is based on inherent rights conferred by "God, nature, or reason", rather than enacted laws of a state or society. It is often associated with theories of ethics, politics, civil law, and religious morality. Natural law is also used to refer to the law of the strongest, which can be observed in the animal kingdom, or as the principle of self-preservation.

Secondly, scientific laws are attempts by scientists to state or approximate the laws of nature. They are inaccurate, approximate truths with a limited range of application. For example, Newton's law of gravitation and Mendel's laws are considered scientific laws.

Thirdly, laws of nature are distinct from both scientific and natural laws. There are two competing theories of laws of nature: the Regularity Theory and the Necessitarian Theory. The Regularity Theory states that laws of nature are mere descriptions of uniformities or regularities in the world. On the other hand, the Necessitarian Theory posits that laws of nature are "principles" that govern natural phenomena, and the natural world "obeys" them. This difference has significant implications for various philosophical issues, including free will and determinism.

In summary, natural law is distinct from scientific laws and laws of nature in terms of its scope, methodology, and underlying principles. Natural law focuses on inherent rights and values deduced from observations of nature and human behaviour. Scientific laws are attempts to approximate laws of nature, which describe uniformities in the world. Laws of nature, according to the Necessitarian Theory, govern natural phenomena and are considered "necessary" principles.

Natural law is a system of law based on values deduced from human nature

Natural law is based on the belief that there are universal moral standards that are inherent in humankind throughout all time. Human beings are not taught natural law per se, but rather, we "discover" it by consistently making choices for good instead of evil. Some schools of thought believe that natural law is passed to humans via a divine presence.

The theory of natural law is based on the idea that everyone—regardless of their governmental or political system, culture, or religion—has the same rights, and these rights cannot be denied by others. The birthrights granted to humans under natural law are not the same as human rights, which vary and can change depending on societal views.

Natural law is often associated with the work of ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, who is considered by many to be the founder of natural law. Aristotle argued that what is "just by nature" is not always the same as what is "just by law". He believed that there is a natural justice that is valid everywhere with the same force.

Another important figure in the development of natural law is Thomas Aquinas, who synthesised and condensed the ideas of his predecessors into his Lex Naturalis ('Natural Law'). Aquinas argued that because human beings have reason, and because reason is a spark of the divine, all human lives are sacred and of infinite value compared to any other created object. This means that everyone is fundamentally equal and bestowed with an intrinsic basic set of rights that no one can remove.

Natural law is also connected to the work of Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, who stressed its role in the justification of property rights and the right to revolution. In more recent times, the concept of natural law has been closely related to the idea of natural rights and has libertarian and conservative proponents.

Natural law is a theory of ethics and philosophy

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature. According to the theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality".

Natural law is derived from the observation of human powers and inclinations, to detect what kind of goods are achievable and deserve to be reached. It is based on the belief that human beings have reason, and because reason is a spark of the divine, all human lives are sacred and of infinite value compared to any other created object. This means that everyone is fundamentally equal and bestowed with an intrinsic basic set of rights that no one can remove.

Natural law is constant throughout time and across the globe because it is based on human nature, not on culture or customs. It is opposed to theories that laws are socially constructed and created by people.

Natural law is witnessed in the US legal system, with the country's Declaration of Independence asserting that every human is granted unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

However, natural law assumes universalising rules, and does not account for the fact that different people or cultures may view the world differently.

Natural law is opposed to the theory that laws are socially constructed

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature. It is derived from a set of inherent rights conferred not by legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law is, therefore, a theory of knowledge in sociology that examines how individuals develop their understanding of the world.

Social constructionism, on the other hand, is a term used in sociology, social ontology, and communication theory. It posits that various facets of social reality—such as concepts, beliefs, norms, and values—are formed through continuous interactions and negotiations among society's members. It suggests that much of what individuals perceive as 'reality' is actually the outcome of a dynamic process of construction influenced by social conventions and structures.

Natural law is, thus, opposed to the theory that laws are socially constructed. While natural law is based on the belief that there are inherent rights and truths that exist independent of human interpretation, social constructionism suggests that laws are formed and shaped by the very people they govern. Natural law is based on the idea that there is an objective truth that exists independent of human perception, whereas social constructionism argues that there are multiple realities that are constructed through social processes and interactions.

Natural law is often associated with essentialism, the belief that objects have a certain set of inherent characteristics that define them. In contrast, social constructionism is anti-essentialist, arguing that there is no inherent "essence" to objective truths.

However, it is important to note that there are different interpretations and variations of both natural law and social constructionism. For example, some scholars point out that the concept of natural law has been used by philosophers in a different sense, such as the law of the strongest or the principle of self-preservation. Similarly, there are strong and weak forms of social constructionism, with the former holding that all knowledge is constructed by human society and the latter allowing for individual understandings over a set of objective facts.

Frequently asked questions