The Standard's Evolution: When Does It Become Law?

The process of how a bill becomes a law is a complex one. In the United States, a bill is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law. The idea for a bill can come from a sitting member of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives or be proposed during their election campaign. Once a bill is introduced, it goes through a rigorous process of research, discussion, changes, and voting in both chambers of Congress. If a bill passes both chambers, it is presented to the president for approval. The president can either approve the bill and sign it into law or refuse to approve it, known as a veto. Interestingly, the U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) refers to the regulations it administers as standards rather than regulations, even though they carry the force of law. This blurs the line between standards and laws, as standards are typically seen as voluntary guidelines.

Voluntary standards vs government regulations

Voluntary standards and government regulations are two different approaches to ensuring safety and quality in products, services, and systems. Here is a detailed comparison of the two:

Voluntary Standards:

Voluntary standards are set by private-sector bodies and are not mandatory for compliance. They are developed through collaboration between industry groups, government agencies, and consumer groups, resulting in best practices for consumer product safety. These standards are detailed in technical documents, outlining specifications, procedures, and guidelines. They are created to ensure that products, services, and systems are safe, consistent, and reliable. An example of a body that creates voluntary standards is the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).

Voluntary standards are often preferred as they offer several advantages:

• Speed and Efficiency: Voluntary standards can be developed and implemented faster than government regulations, which may be time-consuming due to strict oversight rules.
• Cost-Effectiveness: They save government resources as they are developed by non-governmental groups, and federal agencies are legally required to give preference to existing adequate voluntary standards.
• Innovation: These standards allow manufacturers to choose how to meet safety requirements, encouraging innovation without stifling it with specific design constraints.
• Flexibility: Voluntary standards can be created, evolved, or discarded based on changing technologies, innovations, and community needs.
• International Trade: They reduce barriers to international trade by providing a global framework for product safety and quality.
• Consumer Confidence: Voluntary standards enhance consumer trust in the safety and reliability of products, benefiting businesses and the economy.

Government Regulations:

Government regulations, on the other hand, are rules of order having the force of law, prescribed by government authorities. They are issued by government departments or agencies to carry out the intent of legislation. While the term "regulation" is used, some government agencies, like the U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), refer to their regulations as "standards".

Government regulations ensure:

• Uniformity: Regulations ensure uniform application of the law, providing consistent technical requirements across an industry.
• Legal Compliance: As regulations have the force of law, they command compliance and can result in legal consequences if not followed.
• Accountability: Regulations are developed through a structured process that includes input from various stakeholders, ensuring fairness and due process.
• Specificity: Government regulations may include detailed and complex requirements related to materials, processes, design considerations, and technical procedures.

In summary, voluntary standards and government regulations have distinct roles in ensuring the safety and quality of products and services. Voluntary standards are flexible, innovative, and efficient, while government regulations provide legal force, uniformity, and accountability. Both work together to minimize risks and ensure the well-being of consumers.

Standards as a basis for regulations

Standards are voluntary documents that set out specifications, procedures and guidelines to ensure that products, services and systems are safe, consistent and reliable. They are often created by private-sector bodies and are available for use by any person or organisation, whether private or governmental. Standards are distinct from laws, which are rules of order that have the force of law, prescribed by a superior or competent authority.

However, there is a close relationship between good standards and good regulations. Standards can be used as a basis for regulations in several ways. Firstly, standards can be directly referenced in a regulation, becoming mandatory in this way. Secondly, the requirements in specific standards may be used as the mandatory requirements in a regulation. Thirdly, standards may be used as a starting point for writing a regulation. Finally, legislators may use standards as purely advisory guidelines.

Standards offer several advantages when used as a basis for regulations. They relieve regulatory authorities of the need to devise new, detailed or complex requirements, allowing them to simply reference a standard in the text of a regulation. This simplifies and accelerates legislative work, lowers costs, reduces the number of pages of regulations, and makes regulations more manageable.

Furthermore, standards promote uniformity of technical requirements, improve responsiveness to public concerns, encourage participation in standards development, avoid duplication of efforts, facilitate the elimination of barriers to trade, and improve public acceptance of regulations when voluntary standards are endorsed.

Standards referenced in legislation

Standards are not enforceable by law. They are generally established by private sector bodies and contain design, technical, and performance specifications that equipment must meet. They outline minimum industry practices that help professionals establish and progress best practices for work. However, standards can become mandatory when they are incorporated by reference in an Act or delegated legislation.

• As legally mandatory references in Acts or regulations.
• As 'acceptable solutions' or 'means of compliance' in Acts or regulations. This ensures compliance with legislation but does not restrict the use of alternative methods, as long as they meet the specified legislative criteria.
• By a government agency to detail a required condition of contract with an external supplier.
• Incorporated into non-regulatory material as examples of leading practice or guidance for an industry.
• As a means of compliance with industry regulation, for example, specifying requirements for audit certification.
• As a means of dealing with legal liability issues, for example, compliance with various risk management standards may be cited in court as proof that all reasonable steps were taken.

Standards are considered to be clear and recognised rules of compliance. They validate what equipment is capable of. For example, if a carabiner meets a specific standard, it indicates that the manufacturer has had the appropriate testing carried out by a third-party certified lab, ensuring the performance and quality of the product.

Voluntary-consensus standards are standards accepted by federal agencies and referenced in regulations. In 1996, the US Congress signed the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, requiring all federal agencies to use voluntary-consensus standards as much as possible. This type of standard is developed by volunteers who must agree on every detail by consensus.

Standards becoming mandatory

Standards are typically voluntary documents that outline specifications, procedures and guidelines to ensure that products, services and systems are safe, consistent and reliable. They are often created by private-sector bodies and are available for use by any person or organisation, whether private or governmental.

However, standards can become mandatory when they are referenced in legislation. In the US, for example, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act requires federal agencies to use voluntary consensus standards where possible. When standards are referenced in regulations, it relieves regulatory authorities of the need to devise new, detailed, or complex requirements. It also simplifies and accelerates legislative work, lowers costs to the government, and reduces the number of pages of regulations.

In Australia, standards are also voluntary. However, when the State and Commonwealth governments refer to Australian Standards (AS) or joint Australian/New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) in their legislation, these standards become mandatory.

Standards are regularly reviewed to keep pace with new technologies. For example, in 2010, the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) revised the standard for lighting and marking of agricultural equipment on highways. This revised standard was then incorporated into the Agriculture Machinery Illumination Safety Act (AMISA), passed by the US Congress in 2012.

Standards and the risk of new regulations

Standards and regulations are two distinct concepts that often work in tandem. Standards are voluntary documents that outline specifications, procedures, and guidelines to ensure that products, services, and systems are safe, consistent, and reliable. They are often developed by private-sector bodies or industry organisations and are available for use by anyone. On the other hand, regulations are rules of order enacted by governmental bodies, carrying the force of law, and relating to the actions of those under the authority's control.

Standards and regulations are closely related, and good standards can minimise the need for new regulations. Well-designed standards that are applicable and utilised by industries can reduce the risk of new regulations being developed. This is because standards can serve as a basis for regulations, providing a starting point for writing and implementing new laws. In some cases, voluntary consensus standards may be directly referenced or incorporated into regulations. For instance, in the United States, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act mandates that federal agencies use voluntary consensus standards whenever possible.

The relationship between standards and regulations can be advantageous for several reasons. Firstly, it relieves regulatory authorities of the burden of creating new, detailed, or complex requirements. Instead, they can refer to or incorporate existing standards into new regulations. This simplifies and accelerates the legislative process, lowers costs for the government, and reduces the overall number of pages in regulations, making them more manageable. Additionally, using standards in regulations promotes uniformity in technical requirements and improves the responsiveness of regulators to public concerns.

However, it is important to note that the distinction between standards and regulations can sometimes be blurred. For example, the U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) refers to the regulations it administers as "standards" rather than regulations, even though they carry the force of law. This semantic difference can contribute to confusion between voluntary industry standards and government regulations. Nonetheless, the relationship between standards and regulations is crucial, as it allows for the development of effective rules that balance the needs of industries and the public with the authority of governing bodies.

Frequently asked questions