Rebellion: A Duty Against Tyrannical Law

The quote When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. While the quote captures some of the ideas that Jefferson expressed in the Declaration of Independence, there is no evidence that he ever said or wrote this exact phrase. The first known attribution to Jefferson was in 2006, although the saying has been in circulation for decades and was likely popularized by social activists in Australia. The sentiment expressed in this quote resonates with people across the political spectrum, from conservatives to liberals, as it speaks to the right and duty of the people to resist and rebel against unjust or tyrannical governments.

Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence

The famous quote, "When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty", is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson, but its origins are quite different. However, the sentiment expressed in this phrase does resonate with Jefferson's thinking, particularly in the context of his authorship of the Declaration of Independence. This revolutionary document, penned by Jefferson and adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, outlined the colonies' grievances against King George III and justified their decision to break away from Britain and form a new nation.

In the Declaration, Jefferson lays out a list of grievances against King George III, accusing him of abusing his power and infringing upon the rights of the colonists. He writes, "He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only."

Jefferson continues by enumerating the King's abuses of power, including obstructing the administration of justice, maintaining a standing army without the consent of the colonial legislatures, cutting off trade, and imposing taxes without representation. Each grievance was a step towards tyranny, and the accumulation of these injustices led to the colonists' conclusion that their only recourse was revolution. The Declaration proclaims, "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

In asserting that rebellion against tyranny is a duty, Jefferson was drawing on a long tradition of political thought. The phrase "rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God" was a popular slogan during the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, and Jefferson was well versed in this history. He believed that the colonies' rebellion against Britain was not only justified but also necessary to secure the natural rights and liberties of the American people.

In conclusion, while the exact phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" may not have been coined by Thomas Jefferson, his Declaration of Independence embodies this sentiment. The document is a testament to the Enlightenment ideals of liberty, consent of the governed, and the right to revolution. Jefferson's words continue to inspire people around the world in their struggles against oppressive regimes, serving as a reminder that when a government becomes destructive of the very rights and liberties it is meant to protect, it is the duty of the people to rise up and demand change.

Free speech

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, although it has not been found in his writings. It captures some of the ideas that Jefferson expressed in the Declaration of Independence, such as the right and duty of the people to overthrow a despotic government.

The phrase resonates with those who believe that free speech is under threat from an overbearing and all-consuming government, as depicted in George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984." In the novel, the government controls the flow of information, rewriting history, and shaping the social framework to suit its agenda.

In recent times, concerns have been raised about the establishment of the Disinformation Governance Board in the United States, which some perceive as a threat to free speech and a means for the government to control the narrative and stifle dissent.

The defense of free speech is seen as a duty by those who believe that the government is encroaching on their freedoms. They argue that the free flow of information is essential to counter government propaganda and maintain individual liberties.

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" encapsulates the sentiment that when a government becomes tyrannical and infringes on the rights of its citizens, it is the duty of the people to resist and rebel against such oppression. This idea of resistance against injustice, often attributed to Jefferson, continues to inspire those who advocate for free speech and other fundamental rights.

Control of information

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" has been attributed to Thomas Jefferson, although it has not been found in his writings. It captures the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, which asserts the right of the people to overthrow a tyrannical government.

Algorithms, Big Data, and artificial intelligence curate and deliver information in sophisticated ways, contributing to the creation of "filter bubbles" and "echo chambers." These are closed online spaces where people with similar opinions congregate, reinforcing their pre-existing beliefs and avoiding conflicting information. This phenomenon, known as selective exposure, can undermine individuality, autonomy, and the foundation of a liberal society. It poses a threat to liberty by creating a homogeneous perception of reality that can be manipulated by those in power.

The control of information is a tool of dictatorship, as stated by Bruce Coville: "Withholding information is the essence of tyranny. Control of the flow of information is the tool of the dictatorship." This is further supported by Tom Clancy's quote: "The control of information is something the elite always does, particularly in a despotic form of government. Information, knowledge, is power. If you can control information, you can control people."

In conclusion, the control of information is a critical aspect of tyranny, as it enables those in power to shape public perception, manipulate history, and influence the thoughts and opinions of the populace. By controlling the flow of information, tyrannical regimes can maintain their power and suppress dissent. Therefore, ensuring the free flow of information and safeguarding against censorship and propaganda are essential for preserving freedom and democracy.

Government overreach

The phrase "When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is often attributed to Edward Abbey, a prominent American author, and environmental activist. This powerful statement encapsulates the sentiment that when a government abuses its power and infringes on the freedoms and rights of its citizens, it is the responsibility of the people to rise up and oppose that tyranny. This concept has a long history and can be traced back to the Enlightenment-era philosophy and the struggle for independence and liberty during the 18th century.

A classic example of government overreach is the implementation of draconian surveillance programs that infringe on citizens' privacy rights. In the name of national security, some governments have engaged in mass surveillance, including the interception of communications and the collection of personal data on a vast scale. Such actions can erode trust in public institutions and lead to a climate of fear and self-censorship. Similarly, the use of preventive detention and the enactment of vague and overly broad laws that restrict freedom of expression, assembly, and association can also constitute government overreach. These measures often target dissenters, activists, and marginalized communities, silencing their voices and stifling democratic discourse.

Moreover, government overreach can be economic as well. When a state excessively intervenes in the market, distorting free enterprise and competition, it can lead to inefficiencies and hinder innovation. This may involve excessive regulation, nationalization of industries, or the implementation of protectionist policies that limit trade and harm consumers. Such actions can stifle economic growth, reduce competitiveness, and ultimately have negative consequences for the well-being of citizens. Another area of concern is the abuse of eminent domain, where governments forcibly acquire private property for public use without providing just compensation or following due process.

When government overreach occurs, it is essential for citizens to exercise their rights and push back. This can involve engaging in acts of civil disobedience, participating in peaceful protests, and utilizing legal avenues to challenge overreaching policies and laws. A vigilant and informed citizenry is crucial in holding governments accountable and ensuring that power is exercised within the boundaries set by the social contract and the rule of law. The media also plays a vital role in exposing government overreach and providing a platform for public discourse and scrutiny of state actions.

Finally, it is worth noting that the line between legitimate government action and overreach is often subjective and contested. What some may view as necessary intervention, others may see as oppressive. Therefore, a robust and ongoing dialogue within a society is essential to define the limits of state power and to ensure that the principles of liberty, equality, and justice are upheld. The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" serves as a reminder that citizens have a responsibility to actively defend their freedoms and hold their governments accountable to the highest standards of democratic governance.

The role of the media

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States of America. However, there is no evidence that he ever said this. The phrase was first attributed to Jefferson in 2006, although it had been in circulation for several decades prior.

On the other hand, as seen in George Orwell's novel "1984," the media can also be used as a tool for spreading propaganda and controlling public opinion. In this dystopian story, the government ministry in charge of propaganda is called the Ministry of Truth, and it is responsible for falsifying and rewriting history, shaping the social framework, and determining what is considered "truth."

In the real world, the media can be influenced and controlled by powerful interests, including governments and corporations, leading to the spread of disinformation and the suppression of dissent. This dynamic was referenced by a columnist in an opinion piece titled "When Tyranny Becomes Law, Rebellion Becomes Duty," where they criticized the establishment of the Disinformation Governance Board by the US government, comparing it to Orwell's Ministry of Truth.

The columnist argued that the Disinformation Governance Board would determine what is considered "news," control what the media presents to the public, and rewrite history to fit a particular political agenda. They also asserted that the mainstream media had already been co-opted by a particular political ideology, and that this new government entity would further stamp out dissent and cover up failures.

In conclusion, the media plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and exposing or concealing the truth. When tyranny becomes law, a free and independent media can empower the people to recognize and resist oppression. However, when the media is controlled or influenced by the tyrants themselves, it can become a tool for suppressing rebellion and solidifying the grip of tyranny. Thus, a vigilant and critical approach to media consumption is essential for a well-functioning democracy.

Frequently asked questions