Alabama Abortion Law: Where To Read The Full Text

Abortion in Alabama is currently illegal, except when the life of the pregnant individual is in danger. The state's abortion law, known as the Human Life Protection Act, was enacted in May 2019 and imposed a near-total ban on abortion. The law was temporarily blocked by a federal court in 2019 but went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. To read the Alabama abortion law, you can refer to official government websites or legal databases that provide access to state legislation. These sources will allow you to read the specific provisions and details of the law.

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act

The Act amends the state's statute criminalizing abortion, which had been unenforceable due to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade (1973). The Alabama Human Life Protection Act defines a fetus as a legal person "for homicide purposes" and makes performing an abortion a felony, punishable by a minimum of 10 years and up to 99 years in prison, as well as a fine of up to $60,000. The woman receiving the abortion is explicitly exempted from criminal or civil liability.

The Act also specifies that a mother's emotional condition or mental illness is not sufficient grounds for an abortion; a second doctor must agree that the mother has a "serious mental illness" that could result in her or the fetus's death.

The Act has been challenged in court, with Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, and ACLU of Alabama filing a lawsuit on behalf of Alabama abortion providers shortly after the bill was passed. A federal judge blocked the bill in October 2019, citing its defiance of Roe v. Wade and the U.S. Constitution. However, the injunction was lifted in June 2022 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing the Alabama Human Life Protection Act to go into effect.

The bill's authors and supporters

The author of Alabama's 2019 Human Life Protection Act is attorney Eric Johnston. The bill's original sponsor was Rep. Terri Collins (R-Decatur).

The Alabama Pro-Life Coalition drafted the bill, which was introduced into the Lower House on April 2, 2019. The bill passed the Lower House on April 30, the Senate on May 14, and was signed into law by then-Governor Kay Ivey on May 15, 2019.

The bill was supported by the Alliance for a Pro-Life Alabama, which was chaired by Cole Wagner. The coalition's campaign in support of the bill raised $7,993, with the top donor being Briarwood Presbyterian Church, which gave $2,500.

The bill was also supported by the Alabama Citizens' Action Program (ALCAP), the Alabama Policy Institute, the Alabama Pro-Life Coalition, the Alabama Pro-Life Education Fund, Choose Life, Inc., Cameron's Choice, and the Southeast Law Institute.

The bill was opposed by Alabama for Healthy Families and Alabama Students Voting No on Amendment 2. Together, these committees raised $1.56 million, with the top donor being Planned, which gave $1.39 million in cash and in-kind contributions.

The bill's critics and opponents

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as the Human Life Protection Act, has faced strong opposition from various groups and individuals. Critics and opponents of the bill argue that it imposes excessive restrictions on abortion access and criminalizes abortion providers. Here is an overview of the bill's critics and opponents:

• Women's Rights Advocates: The bill has been criticized for its failure to include exceptions for cases of rape or incest, disregarding the rights and well-being of women who become pregnant as a result of these crimes.
• Medical Experts: Many medical professionals, including Dr. Ted Anderson, president of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, disagree with the bill's use of the term "heartbeat." They argue that it is misleading and inaccurate to refer to the embryonic cardiac activity in the early stages of pregnancy as a heartbeat.
• Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): These organizations have been vocal opponents of the bill, filing a lawsuit in May 2019 to challenge its constitutionality. They argue that the bill infringes on the reproductive rights of women and could lead to unsafe measures to end pregnancies.
• Staci Fox, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Southeast: Fox criticized the bill, stating that it aims to take the country backward instead of forward. She emphasized the importance of defending reproductive rights and keeping abortion safe and legal.
• Yellowhammer Fund: This organization financially assists women in Alabama seeking abortions and has been critical of the bill's restrictive nature. They have provided financial support to women at abortion clinics in the state.
• Business Community: Some businesses have boycotted Alabama due to the bill, with Birmingham Mayor Randall Woodfin noting that two tech companies decided not to base themselves in the city as a result of the restrictive abortion laws.
• Governor Kay Ivey: While she signed the bill into law, Governor Ivey acknowledged that it was likely unenforceable due to the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. She also expressed her disagreement with Roe v. Wade, stating that the bill aimed to prompt the Supreme Court to reconsider the ruling.
• Public Opinion: According to a 2014 survey by the Pew Research Center, 37% of adults in Alabama believed abortion should be legal in all or most cases, indicating a significant portion of the state's population opposed the restrictive nature of the bill.

The bill's legal challenges

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as the Human Life Protection Act, was signed into law by then-Governor Kay Ivey on May 15 or 16, 2019. It was scheduled to go into effect in November 2019, but its implementation was delayed by legal challenges.

The law bans abortions at any stage of a pregnancy, with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest. It only allows abortions if there is a serious health risk to the mother or if the fetus has a lethal anomaly. The legislation also specifies that it isn't enough for the mother to have an "emotional condition" or mental illness – a second doctor would need to agree that the mother has a "serious mental illness" that could cause her or the fetus to die.

The law was challenged by abortion rights advocates, who argued that it contravened the Supreme Court precedent set by Roe v. Wade, and that it violated the right of an individual to privacy, to make choices central to personal dignity and autonomy.

On October 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Myron Herbert Thompson issued a preliminary injunction against the abortion ban, preventing the legislation from entering into effect on November 15, 2019. Thompson wrote an opinion in which he argued that the Alabama abortion ban "violates the right of an individual to privacy, to make choices central to personal dignity and autonomy. It diminishes the capacity of women to act in society, and to make reproductive decisions."

However, on June 24, 2022, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Judge Thompson lifted the injunction, allowing the law to go into effect.

The law has been strongly opposed by Democratic politicians and activists, and it has also been criticized by a number of Republican politicians. Several proposed amendments that would have allowed abortions in cases of rape and incest were rejected.

The bill's implications

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, also known as House Bill 314, is one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States. The bill was passed by the Alabama Legislature on May 15, 2019, and signed into law by then-Governor Kay Ivey on May 16, 2019. The bill makes it a felony for doctors to perform or attempt to perform abortions in the state, with the only exception being cases where the mother's life is at risk. Notably, the bill does not include exceptions for victims of rape or incest.

The Alabama abortion law has several significant implications, which include:

• Criminalization of Abortion Providers: The bill classifies the performance of abortion or attempted abortion as a felony offence, punishable by up to 99 years in prison for doctors. This has effectively criminalized medical professionals who provide abortion services, deterring them from offering such procedures.
• Limited Exceptions: While the bill allows for abortions if the mother's life is at risk, it notably excludes exceptions for cases of rape or incest. This means that victims of sexual assault or incest are not legally permitted to obtain abortions in Alabama, unless their life is endangered.
• Impact on Women's Reproductive Rights: By restricting access to safe and legal abortions, the bill effectively limits women's reproductive rights and autonomy. Women in Alabama may face difficulties in accessing abortion services, potentially leading to unsafe measures or out-of-state travel to obtain abortions.
• Legal Challenges and Precedent: The bill has faced legal challenges, with organizations like Planned Parenthood and the ACLU filing lawsuits to contest the anti-abortion legislation. The bill's passage also set a precedent for other states to introduce similar restrictive laws, contributing to a broader trend of conservative abortion policies across the nation.
• Healthcare Disparities: The lack of exceptions in the bill can result in disparities in healthcare access for women in Alabama, particularly those from marginalized communities. Women of colour, low-income women, and those living in rural areas may face additional barriers and challenges in obtaining reproductive healthcare.
• Economic Impact: The bill's restrictions on abortion access can have economic implications for the state. The decrease in abortion services may lead to increased costs for women seeking reproductive healthcare, as well as potential economic losses for businesses associated with the industry.
• Mental Health Considerations: The bill does not consider mental health as a valid reason for abortion, unless a woman is diagnosed with a "serious mental illness" by two physicians. This narrow interpretation of mental health exceptions can create barriers for women experiencing mental health issues who seek abortions.
• Societal and Cultural Impact: The bill's passage reflects the societal and cultural attitudes towards abortion in Alabama, with a significant portion of the state's population opposing abortion. This has influenced political decisions and shaped the state's approach to reproductive rights.
• Impact on Healthcare Professionals: The bill places healthcare professionals, particularly doctors, in a challenging position. They must navigate between providing necessary medical care and complying with the law, potentially affecting their practice and patient relationships.
• Potential for Unsafe Procedures: With limited access to safe and legal abortions, there is a risk of an increase in unsafe abortion procedures. Women may resort to unregulated or illegal methods, which can have detrimental health consequences.

The Alabama abortion law, with its restrictive nature and limited exceptions, has far-reaching implications for healthcare, women's rights, and societal attitudes towards abortion. It has sparked debates and legal challenges, highlighting the ongoing controversy surrounding abortion legislation in the United States.

Frequently asked questions