Who Holds The Power Over Abortion Laws?

Abortion laws vary from country to country, and even from state to state. In the US, the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision made abortion legal in every state, but this was overturned by the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling, which removed the constitutional right to abortion. This means that individual US states now have the power to prohibit or regulate abortion as they see fit, and abortion laws vary significantly across the country.

The role of the federal government

In the absence of uniform federal legislation, the federal courts have played a crucial role in shaping abortion laws. The Supreme Court's rulings in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) established federal protections for a pregnant woman's right to abortion, preventing states from imposing bans before fetal viability. However, this changed with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling in 2022, which overturned Roe and Casey, giving states the authority to impose their own regulations on abortion as long as they satisfy rational basis review and do not conflict with other federal laws.

The federal government's role in abortion law is also influenced by its funding decisions. The Hyde Amendment, enacted in 1977, bans federal funding for abortion, impacting low-income women on Medicaid and other federal health programs. This amendment has been attached as a "rider" to annual appropriations bills, requiring yearly reconsideration when the government's budget is voted on. While there are currently exceptions for cases of rape, incest, and danger to the mother's life, these exceptions have not always existed, and the Hyde Amendment has significantly limited low-income women's reproductive choices.

Additionally, the Trump administration proposed changes to Title X, the federal family planning program, which effectively prevented patients from receiving preventive care at Planned Parenthood, a major provider of reproductive health services. These actions by the federal government have contributed to increasing restrictions on abortion access and highlighted the complex and evolving nature of the federal government's role in abortion law and policy.

State constitutions and abortion rights

The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization effectively removed the federal constitutional right to abortion, allowing states to impose their own regulations on the procedure. This has resulted in varying abortion laws across the country, with some states prohibiting abortion entirely, while others permit it with certain restrictions.

State constitutions have become a crucial tool in the fight for abortion rights. Some state constitutions explicitly protect abortion rights and access, providing stronger legal grounds than the US Constitution. For example, the state constitutions of Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, and Vermont, among others, have been interpreted to protect abortion rights. In these states, abortion is generally legal up to a certain point in pregnancy, such as fetal viability, or to protect the life and health of the pregnant individual.

On the other hand, some states have amended their constitutions to declare that they do not protect abortion rights or allow public funding for abortions. As of April 2023, four states had passed such amendments. Additionally, several states have enacted stricter abortion laws following the Dobbs decision, including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah.

State courts have also played a significant role in shaping abortion rights. In some cases, state supreme courts have overturned abortion bans, finding that their state constitutions protect the right to abortion. For instance, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy in the state constitution includes a right to abortion, overturning the state's six-week abortion ban. Similarly, the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed that the right to abortion is inherent within the state's constitution, even if Roe v. Wade were overturned.

However, in other states, such as Idaho, the highest court ruled that the state constitution did not protect abortion rights, allowing abortion bans to stand. These divergent decisions highlight the volatile and inconsistent nature of abortion rights across the country.

Looking Forward

The future of abortion rights in the US remains uncertain. While some states have strong constitutional protections for abortion, others are working to restrict access further. Ballot initiatives and court rulings will continue to shape the legal landscape of abortion, with advocates on both sides pushing for their preferred outcomes.

Parental involvement laws

Some states require the minor and a parent to provide government-issued identification to the abortion provider and/or as part of notarizing the parental consent form. A few states also mandate that the parent provides proof of parenthood. Several states allow grandparents or other adult relatives to be involved in place of the minor's parents, and many waive parental involvement requirements if there is a medical emergency or the young person is a victim of abuse or neglect.

While most state parental involvement requirements include a judicial bypass procedure that allows a minor to receive court approval for an abortion without their parents' knowledge, some states require judges to use specific criteria when determining whether to grant a waiver. These criteria can include the young person's intelligence, emotional stability, and understanding of the possible consequences of obtaining an abortion.

State-level restrictions

In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

In June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which had protected a pregnant woman's right to get an abortion and ensured that states could not ban abortion prior to the point at which a fetus may be deemed viable. This decision has opened the door for states to ban abortion outright, and currently, abortion is illegal in 13 states.

As a result, the legal status of abortion varies considerably from state to state. For example, abortion is illegal in Alabama, with exceptions to preserve the pregnant individual's life or physical health. There are no exceptions for rape, incest, or fatal fetal abnormalities. Performing an abortion in Alabama is a Class A felony with up to 99 years in prison, and attempted abortion is a Class C felony punishable by 1 to 10 years in prison.

On the other hand, abortion is legal in California up to the point of fetal viability or after that if necessary to preserve the life or health (including mental health) of the pregnant individual. California does not require parental consent or notification for minors seeking an abortion.

In addition to these differences in the legality of abortion, there are also variations in the specific restrictions and requirements that states impose. For instance, some states limit abortions to a maximum number of weeks into pregnancy, usually before the fetus is considered viable outside the womb. Other states have passed laws banning specific methods of abortion, such as dilation and extraction (D&X) or dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures.

Furthermore, due to the Hyde Amendment, many state health programs that low-income women rely on for their healthcare do not cover abortions. As of 2023, only 17 states, including California, Illinois, and New York, offer or require such coverage.

The current legal status of abortion at the state level in the US varies significantly, and it is essential to refer to the specific laws and regulations in each state to understand the restrictions and protections in place.

The impact on democracy

The impact of abortion laws on democracy is complex and far-reaching. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned nearly five decades of federal constitutional protection for abortion rights, established in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). This ruling shifted the power to regulate abortion access to state and local governments, significantly impacting democratic principles and processes.

Voter Participation and Representation:

The absence of federal protection for abortion rights has empowered state and local legislatures to introduce bills that directly or indirectly restrict reproductive rights. This shift in authority undermines voter participation and representation by disregarding the outcomes of ballot measures and making it more difficult for citizens to initiate them. For example, in Ohio, Missouri, Florida, and Mississippi, legislators have proposed bills that increase the requirements for introducing and passing initiated constitutional amendments, reducing the ability of citizens to shape laws directly.

Separation of Powers:

The separation of powers, a foundational principle of US democracy, is also challenged by post-Dobbs abortion legislation. State courts, a critical component of the judicial branch, have had their authority to interpret state constitutions and block harmful laws curtailed by legislative efforts in some states. For instance, Utah, Montana, and Wyoming have introduced or passed bills that restrict the power of state courts to rule on the constitutionality of abortion laws, disrupting the balance of powers between the legislative and judicial branches.

Equality and Autonomy:

Abortion laws also impact the democratic principles of equality and personal autonomy. Without the ability to make reproductive decisions, women and pregnant individuals are denied equal participation in democracy. Furthermore, abortion restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including people of color, young people, and those with low incomes, further entrenching inequalities. State courts have played a crucial role in protecting abortion rights and access, with several recognizing abortion as a fundamental right rooted in privacy, autonomy, and equality principles.

Federalism and State Variation:

The absence of federal abortion protections has resulted in a patchwork of state laws, with significant variation in access across the country. This variation underscores the impact of federalism on democratic outcomes, as residents of different states have vastly different reproductive rights and freedoms. The impact of abortion laws on democracy is thus deeply contextual, with the consequences varying based on geographic location and the specific laws enacted by state and local governments.

Frequently asked questions