The Pendleton Act: A Life-Changing Sacrifice

who was shot for the pendleton act to become law

The Pendleton Act, officially known as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, was passed in 1883 as a response to the assassination of President James A. Garfield by Charles Guiteau, a disgruntled job seeker. Guiteau was angry about not receiving a government position and believed that his efforts in the Republican campaign more than qualified him for a consulship in Paris. The Pendleton Act was designed to establish a merit-based system for federal employment, requiring candidates for certain government jobs to be selected based on their performance in competitive examinations. This act transformed the nature of public service, ensuring that federal employees were chosen based on their skills and knowledge rather than political connections.

Characteristics Values
Name James A. Garfield
Role President of the United States
Date of assassination 2nd July 1881
Assassin Charles J. Guiteau
Reason for assassination Garfield did not give Guiteau a government position

lawshun

Assassination of President James A. Garfield

On July 2, 1881, President James A. Garfield was shot at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington, D.C. He died eleven weeks later in Elberon, New Jersey, from his injuries, making him the second U.S. president to be assassinated.

Garfield's assassin, Charles J. Guiteau, was a disgruntled job seeker. He had decided he wanted a federal position and threw himself into supporting the Republican ticket during the campaign. Guiteau wrote a speech titled "Garfield vs. Hancock," which was published by the Republican National Committee. He felt that his efforts toward helping Garfield achieve victory more than qualified him for a position in the consul in Paris, despite the fact that he did not speak French. In fact, Guiteau felt that Garfield owed him this job.

Guiteau was not even considered for the position, in part because Garfield's Secretary of State, James G. Blaine, had no intention of awarding a position to Guiteau that he had not earned, and for which he was not qualified. Guiteau blamed what he considered to be his loss on conflict between factions of the Republican party, and he thought that the only way it could be brought to an end was through the assassination of President Garfield.

Garfield's assassination by a deranged office seeker amplified the public demand for reform. Civil service reformers established the National Civil Service Reform League and undertook a major public campaign for reform, arguing that the spoils system had played a major role in the assassination of Garfield.

The Pendleton Act, named after its primary sponsor, Senator George H. Pendleton of Ohio, sought to rectify this by creating a merit-based system for federal employment. Under the Act, candidates for certain government jobs would be selected based on their performance in competitive examinations. This would ensure the best-qualified candidates were appointed to government positions. The Pendleton Act also made it illegal to fire or demote government officials for political reasons and created the United States Civil Service Commission to enforce the merit system.

The Legislative Journey: Proposal to Law

You may want to see also

lawshun

The Pendleton Act's impact on modern federal employees

President James A. Garfield was shot and killed by Charles Guiteau, a disgruntled job seeker who believed he had not received an appointment because of his affiliation with the Stalwarts. This assassination led to the passing of the Pendleton Act, which established a merit-based system for federal employment.

The Pendleton Act, officially known as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, has had a significant impact on modern federal employees. Here are some key ways in which the Act continues to influence federal employment:

Merit-Based Hiring and Promotion

The Act established the principle of employment based on merit rather than political connections. Federal agencies are required to recruit, select, and advance employees based on their abilities, knowledge, and skills, using fair and open competition. This ensures that the best-qualified candidates are appointed to government positions.

Protection Against Unfair Dismissal

The Act prohibits the firing or demotion of government officials for political reasons. It also forbids requiring employees to provide political service or contributions. These protections ensure a more stable and non-partisan workforce.

Increased Professionalism

The Act transformed the nature of public service by prioritizing merit and qualifications over political connections. As a result, today's federal employees are often well-educated and highly trained professionals who are skilled in their respective fields.

Expanded Scope

When the Pendleton Act was first implemented, it only covered about 10% of federal employees. However, over time, its scope has broadened, and now it applies to most of the 2.9 million positions in the federal government. This expansion ensures that a more significant number of federal employees are protected by the Act's principles.

Inspiration for Further Reforms

The Pendleton Act inspired subsequent legislation, such as the Hatch Act of 1939, which further protected federal employees by limiting their political activities. These additional reforms have created a more comprehensive framework for fair and non-partisan federal employment practices.

In summary, the Pendleton Act revolutionized federal employment practices by promoting merit-based hiring, protecting employees from political interference, and fostering a more qualified and efficient workforce. While there have been amendments and supplementary laws, the core principles of the Pendleton Act continue to form the foundation of modern civil service in the United States.

lawshun

The spoils system

The Pendleton Act, passed in 1883, was a response to the assassination of President James A. Garfield by Charles Guiteau, a disgruntled job seeker. The Act established a merit-based system for selecting government officials and supervising their work. It mandated that federal government jobs be awarded based on merit rather than political patronage.

The Pendleton Act was a direct result of the flaws in the spoils system, also known as a patronage system, which was prevalent in American politics at the time. The term "spoils system" is derived from the phrase "to the victor go the spoils", and it refers to the practice of rewarding political allies with government jobs in exchange for financial and political support. This system, which was in full force by the time Andrew Jackson was elected president in 1828, led to abuses and inefficiencies in the government.

Under the spoils system, officials rewarded their political friends and supporters with government positions as a reward for helping them win the election and to incentivize them to continue working for the party. This often resulted in appointments that were based solely on the needs of the party, without considering the qualifications or abilities of the appointees. For example, President Benjamin Harrison changed 31,000 postmasters in a single year, leading to inefficiency and instability.

The Pendleton Act transformed the nature of public service by implementing a merit-based system for selecting government officials. It provided that federal government jobs be awarded through competitive exams and made it unlawful to fire or demote employees for political reasons. While initially, only about 10% of federal employees were covered by the Act, its scope has broadened over the years, and today it applies to most of the 2.9 million positions in the federal government.

The Pendleton Act was a significant step towards civil service reform and helped to create a more professional and qualified federal workforce. It also led to major changes in campaign finance, as political parties were forced to seek new sources of funding, such as wealthy donors.

The Long Road: Bill to Law

You may want to see also

lawshun

The Pendleton Act's influence on campaign finance

President James A. Garfield was shot in 1881, and his assassination played a role in the passing of the Pendleton Act.

The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, passed in 1883, was a federal law that mandated that federal government jobs be awarded based on merit rather than political patronage. It banned the use of political assessments, or mandatory fees imposed on federal and state officeholders by political parties, to fund federal election campaigns.

Prior to the Pendleton Act, political parties often acquired funds by taking a percentage of the fees earned by officials they appointed to federal offices. With the Pendleton Act prohibiting these officials from contributing to political campaigns, parties had to seek new sources of campaign funds, such as wealthy donors.

The Pendleton Act also established a merit-based system of selecting government officials, requiring them to be selected through competitive exams. This transformed the nature of public service, and today, many well-educated and trained professionals are federal employees.

While the Pendleton Act succeeded in ending the use of political assessments to fund campaigns, it ultimately shifted election financing from political parties to corporate America and wealthy donors. This resulted in a new era of campaign finance law, which continues to be a contentious issue in American politics.

lawshun

The Hatch Act of 1939

President James A. Garfield was assassinated in 1881 by Charles Guiteau, a deranged job seeker who believed he had not been given a position due to his affiliation with the Stalwarts—a pro-spoils, conservative branch of the Republican Party. This assassination brought about a heightened demand for civil service reform, which led to the passing of the Pendleton Act in 1883.

The Hatch Act was passed in response to allegations that local Democratic Party politicians used employees of the Works Progress Administration (WPA) during the 1938 congressional elections. This was particularly prominent in swing states such as Kentucky, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Maryland. In Pennsylvania, evidence was publicised that Democratic politicians were consulted on the appointment of WPA administrators and caseworkers, and that WPA jobs were used to gain an unfair political advantage.

The Act forbids the intimidation or bribery of voters and restricts political campaign activities by federal employees. It prohibits the use of public funds designated for relief or public works for electoral purposes. It also disallows officials paid with federal funds from using promises of jobs, promotion, financial assistance, contracts, or any other benefit to coerce campaign contributions or political support.

The Act also precludes federal employees from joining "any political organisation which advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government". This provision was intended to prohibit membership in far-left and far-right organisations, such as the Communist Party USA and the German-American Bund.

In summary, the Hatch Act of 1939 was a significant piece of legislation aimed at reducing political corruption and protecting the integrity of federal government employees' political activities.

The Corrupt Law: A Broken System's Tale

You may want to see also

Frequently asked questions

President James A. Garfield was shot by a disgruntled job seeker, Charles Guiteau, for the Pendleton Act to become law. Guiteau was angry over not being given a government position after contributing to what he thought was a significant aid to Garfield's election.

The Pendleton Act, officially known as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, was a federal law enacted by the United States Congress in 1883. It established a merit-based system for federal employment, requiring candidates to take competitive exams to qualify for government jobs.

The Pendleton Act transformed the nature of public service, making it more neutral and non-political. Today, it covers most of the 2.9 million federal employees, ensuring that federal agencies recruit, select, and advance employees based on their abilities, knowledge, and skills through fair and open competition.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment