The Abortion Law Battle: Who Emerges Victorious?

Abortion laws in the United States have been a contentious issue for decades, with the debate framed as 'pro-choice' versus 'pro-life'. In June 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 ruling that had protected abortion rights nationwide. This decision has given individual states the power to regulate abortion access, resulting in a complex and varied legal landscape. While some states have chosen to protect abortion rights, others have introduced near-total bans, with varying exceptions. The impact of these laws is felt most by those from marginalised communities, who often face significant barriers to accessing abortion services. As a result, abortion rights have become a key issue in the upcoming US presidential election, with Democratic candidate Kamala Harris advocating for federal abortion protections, while Republican rival Donald Trump supports state-level legislation.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case. The ruling was made on originalist grounds that a right to abortion cannot be found in the U.S. Constitution. The decision ended the nearly 50-year protection of abortion rights by the United States Constitution and allowed individual states to regulate any aspect of abortion not preempted by federal law.

The Dobbs case concerned a Mississippi law (the Gestational Age Act) that banned abortions after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs enabled "trigger laws" in 13 states to effectively ban abortions. Texas and Missouri immediately banned abortions with the exception of cases where the pregnancy was deemed particularly life-threatening.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade was the culmination of decades of efforts by anti-abortion activists and politicians, particularly those from the Republican Party, to restrict abortion access and criminalize the procedure. The decision was also influenced by the conservative makeup of the Supreme Court, with Justices appointed by Republican presidents constituting a majority of the Court.

The ruling had a significant impact on abortion access and reproductive rights in the United States. Several states moved quickly to restrict or ban abortions, while others sought to protect abortion rights through state constitutions or legislation. The decision also sparked protests and debates across the country, with many Americans expressing concern over the loss of abortion rights and the potential impact on women's health and autonomy.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade also had broader implications for American society and politics. It shifted the focus of the abortion debate to the state level, with states becoming the primary battleground for abortion rights advocates and opponents. The decision also highlighted the deep polarization and ideological divisions within the country, with the issue of abortion becoming a key factor in elections and political campaigns.

In the aftermath of the ruling, there were efforts to address the impact of restricted abortion access, particularly for women from marginalized communities who faced greater barriers to reproductive healthcare. These efforts included legal challenges to state abortion bans, the expansion of abortion funds and practical support for those seeking abortions, and the mobilization of abortion rights activists to advocate for policy changes and protect access to abortion services.

State abortion laws and their enforcement

Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with few exceptions; others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while some allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

In states where abortion is illegal, there are varying penalties for performing abortions, with some states classifying it as a felony. For example, in Alabama, performing an abortion is a Class A felony with up to 99 years in prison, while in Kentucky, it is a Class C felony with imprisonment of 5 to 10 years.

Some states have also enacted laws that prohibit abortion before viability, which is usually around 24 weeks. These laws were previously unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade but are now being enforced in some states.

In addition to state laws, there are also some federal laws that provide substantive criminal provisions either protecting or penalizing abortion. For example, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 bans a specific type of abortion procedure and stipulates prison sentences for those who perform it.

The legality and enforcement of abortion laws vary widely across the US, with some states protecting access to abortion and others banning it entirely. The enforcement of these laws can include criminal penalties, civil lawsuits, and restrictions on medical providers.

Criminalisation of abortion

The criminalisation of abortion has been a highly divisive issue in the United States, with a majority of Americans supporting access to abortion. The debate surrounding abortion is influenced by various factors, including stigma, religious beliefs, and ethical convictions. While some states have chosen to criminalise abortion, others have taken steps to protect abortion rights in their state constitutions.

In some countries, such as the United States, Sierra Leone, Poland, and Morocco, abortion is criminalised, and those who seek or assist with abortions face legal consequences. The penalties for abortion vary across countries, with some imposing life imprisonment for those who undergo the procedure. Additionally, there are laws in place to penalise individuals who help others seek abortions.

The criminalisation of abortion creates barriers for individuals seeking reproductive healthcare. It pushes people towards unsafe, clandestine abortions, which can have fatal consequences, including maternal deaths and disabilities. The World Health Organization estimates that the rate of unsafe abortions is four times higher in countries with restrictive abortion laws compared to those where abortion is legal.

The impact of criminalisation is more severe for those who are already marginalised, including low-income individuals, refugees, migrants, LGBTI people, and racialised and Indigenous communities. These groups often face challenges in accessing healthcare services, and criminalisation further limits their ability to seek safe abortions.

Despite the stigma and misinformation surrounding abortion, most people agree that it should be legal. However, many individuals feel unsure about how to voice their support, allowing the vocal anti-abortion minority to dominate the narrative.

The criminalisation of abortion not only affects those seeking abortions but also those defending abortion rights. Human rights defenders advocating for abortion rights face stigmatisation, physical and verbal attacks, intimidation, and threats. They are subject to unjust prosecutions, investigations, and arrests for their work in helping individuals access their right to abortion.

The Way Forward

To address the issue of criminalisation, it is essential to recognise abortion as a human rights issue. Abortion is connected to various rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as the right to non-discrimination and freedom from torture. By understanding abortion as a human rights issue, we can work towards decriminalisation and ensuring access to safe and legal abortions.

Additionally, it is crucial to address the social, cultural, and economic barriers that hinder individuals from exercising their reproductive rights. This includes improving access to healthcare services, addressing stigma, and providing education to dispel misinformation about abortion.

By working towards decriminalisation and removing barriers, we can create a future where abortion rights are respected and individuals are free to make their own decisions about their bodies and their future.

Abortion rights movements

Abortion-rights movements, also known as pro-choice movements, advocate for legal access to induced abortion services, including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancies without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

History of Abortion Rights Movements

The abortion-rights movement emerged in the 1960s in the context of victories in the area of birth control. Campaigners such as Marie Stopes in England and Margaret Sanger in the US brought the issue into the open, and birth control clinics were established to offer family planning advice and contraceptive methods to women in need.

In the late 1920s, Stella Browne, a leading birth control campaigner, began to venture into the more contentious issue of abortion. Browne believed that working women should have the choice to become pregnant and to terminate their pregnancies. In 1929, she delivered a lecture, "The Right to Abortion," and in 1931, she began to develop her argument for women's right to decide to have an abortion.

In July 1932, the abortion-rights movement broke into the mainstream when the British Medical Association council formed a committee to discuss making changes to the laws on abortion. On February 17, 1936, Janet Chance, Alice Jenkins, and Joan Malleson established the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA) as the first advocacy organization for abortion liberalization. ALRA promoted access to abortion in the United Kingdom and campaigned for the elimination of legal obstacles.

In America, an abortion reform movement emerged in the 1960s. In 1964, Gerri Santoro of Connecticut died trying to obtain an illegal abortion, and her photo became the symbol of the abortion rights movement. Some women's rights activist groups developed their own skills to provide abortions to women who could not obtain them elsewhere. For example, in Chicago, a group known as "Jane" operated a floating abortion clinic throughout the 1960s.

In the late 1960s, a number of organizations were formed to mobilize opinion both against and for the legalization of abortion. The forerunner of the NARAL Pro-Choice America was formed in 1969 to oppose restrictions on abortion and expand access. In late 1973, NARAL became the National Abortion Rights Action League.

Landmark Judicial Rulings

The landmark judicial ruling of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade ruled that a Texas statute forbidding abortion except when necessary to save the life of the mother was unconstitutional. The Court held that a right to privacy existed and included the right to have an abortion. The court found that a mother had a right to abortion until viability, a point to be determined by the abortion doctor. After viability, a woman can obtain an abortion for health reasons, which the Court defined broadly to include psychological well-being.

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022), the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, explicitly rejecting the notion that the Constitution protects a right to abortion. The Dobbs decision spurred a generational shift in the pro-choice movement, with states moving to either restrict or expand access to abortion, depending on the political leanings of the party in power.

Current Abortion Rights Activism

Abortion rights activists have been energized by the Dobbs decision, facilitating the travel of women seeking abortions to states where the procedure is legal and persuading private companies to include reimbursement for abortion-related travel in their employees' insurance plans. Public rhetoric characterizes abortion bans as implicating not only choice and personal liberty but also the well-being of women whose lives or health are endangered by their pregnancies. Doctors across the country have supported the framing of abortion as necessary health care.

The generally limited health care available to women of color has also spurred a racial argument for increasing access to abortion, as the maternal death rate for women of color is higher on average than for other groups, and early post-Dobbs data suggests that the decision will exacerbate this problem. Polling after Dobbs consistently shows that an increasing majority of Americans oppose restrictive abortion bans, believing that abortion should be legal in all, most, or at least some cases. Pro-choice advocates have been able to parlay this popular support into electoral victories in many states.

Public opinion on abortion

Broad Support for Abortion Rights

According to various polls, a majority of Americans support abortion rights and believe it should be legal in all or most cases. A Pew Research Center survey from April 2024 found that 63% of respondents said abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 36% said it should be illegal in all or most cases. Similarly, a PRRI survey from 2023 showed that 64% of Americans supported abortion legality in most or all cases, with 35% saying it should be illegal in most or all cases. Only 9% believed it should be illegal in all cases.

Political and Demographic Variations

There are significant differences in opinion between Democrats and Republicans, with a 50-point gap between the two parties according to the PRRI survey. 86% of Democrats supported abortion legality in all or most cases, compared to 36% of Republicans. Independents leaned more towards the Democratic position, with 67% supporting abortion legality.

A gender gap has also emerged, with more women than men supporting abortion rights. The PRRI survey found that 66% of women and 62% of men believed abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Among Democrats, young women aged 18-29 were the most supportive of abortion legality at 92%, compared to 86% of young Democratic men.

Religious Views

The PRRI survey also highlighted differences in opinion between religious groups. Majorities of most religious traditions supported abortion legality, including Unitarian Universalists (93%), Jewish Americans (81%), Buddhists (79%), and Black Protestants (71%). However, white evangelical Protestants (27%), Latter-day Saints (30%), and Jehovah's Witnesses (25%) were the only major religious groups where less than half supported abortion legality.

Impact on Voting

Abortion has become an increasingly important issue for voters. A Gallup poll from May 2024 found that 32% of voters said they would only vote for a candidate who shared their views on abortion, up from 24% in 2020. This was particularly true for pro-choice voters, with 40% saying they would only vote for a candidate who shared their views.

Views on Specific Abortion Policies

While Americans broadly support abortion rights, there are nuances when it comes to specific policies. For example, a Gallup survey from 2023 found that while two-thirds supported abortion in the first trimester, support decreased for the second and third trimesters, with majorities opposing legal abortion in those periods. Additionally, a majority of Americans opposed laws that would ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.

International Perspective

Support for legal abortion is not limited to the US; it is widespread in many places around the world. A Pew Research Center survey from 2023-2024 found that majorities in most of the 27 places surveyed said abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Frequently asked questions